0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Trim on November 10, 2011, 10:38:17 AMFinally read through the full pleadings. Found this interesting.Quote61. In addition, Beasley promptly paid Counter-Defendant the outstanding balance that Counter-Defendant claimed was due him. Specifically, Bell demanded that Beasley reimburse Counter-Defendant for thousands of dollars that had been laid out before Beasley had ever signed a player-agent agreement. Beasley promptly paid Counter-Defendant in full.So, according to Mike, all of the "extra benefits" have been paid back some time ago.would this not be viewed an admission that he received the goods in the NCAA's eyes? Who cares legally, but NCAA-wise could be bad for us?
Finally read through the full pleadings. Found this interesting.Quote61. In addition, Beasley promptly paid Counter-Defendant the outstanding balance that Counter-Defendant claimed was due him. Specifically, Bell demanded that Beasley reimburse Counter-Defendant for thousands of dollars that had been laid out before Beasley had ever signed a player-agent agreement. Beasley promptly paid Counter-Defendant in full.So, according to Mike, all of the "extra benefits" have been paid back some time ago.
61. In addition, Beasley promptly paid Counter-Defendant the outstanding balance that Counter-Defendant claimed was due him. Specifically, Bell demanded that Beasley reimburse Counter-Defendant for thousands of dollars that had been laid out before Beasley had ever signed a player-agent agreement. Beasley promptly paid Counter-Defendant in full.
he took the loan from bell after he left school but before he was drafted and started collecting paychecks. this is common practice.
Quote from: pissclams on November 10, 2011, 12:42:34 PMhe took the loan from bell after he left school but before he was drafted and started collecting paychecks. this is common practice.That's not what's being talked about in the part of the counter-suit I excerpted.
