Author Topic: Bryce  (Read 121729 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #300 on: September 28, 2011, 12:02:21 AM »
Dominique Whaley.  Dude had 4 TDs against Tulsa. 

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #301 on: September 28, 2011, 12:28:05 AM »
Here are the current yardage rankings for the top 10 rated RB recruits in Bryce's class.   4 of 10 suck.  The whole thing is a crapshoot.  Taking for granted that he would be good was a stupid thing for people to do - especially given that he is a retread.

6
13
24
27
43
59
112
145
>500 (not injured)
>500 (not injured)

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #302 on: September 28, 2011, 01:28:30 AM »
Bryce will stay and by the end of the season he will be tearing it up. Don't ask me how I know, I just do.   :emawkid:
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #303 on: September 28, 2011, 04:07:16 AM »
I'm fine with setting aside some of the BBBS money to fund the abortion.

God, can you imagine Arthur as a big in a commercial always reminding his lil bros to "wrap up"? I mean, obviously he's not that great at it yet, but I bet he could grow into the role.
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20631
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #304 on: September 28, 2011, 05:50:24 AM »
LHC Bill Snyder doesn't know how to teach kids to have a work ethic. 

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #305 on: September 28, 2011, 06:15:56 AM »
Here are the current yardage rankings for the top 10 rated RB recruits in Bryce's class.   4 of 10 suck.  The whole thing is a crapshoot.  Taking for granted that he would be good was a stupid thing for people to do - especially given that he is a retread.

6
13
24
27
43
59
112
145
>500 (not injured)
>500 (not injured)

:lol:

Worst strawman ever.

:lol:

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #306 on: September 28, 2011, 06:54:28 AM »
Here are the current yardage rankings for the top 10 rated RB recruits in Bryce's class.   4 of 10 suck.  The whole thing is a crapshoot.  Taking for granted that he would be good was a stupid thing for people to do - especially given that he is a retread.

6
13
24
27
43
59
112
145
>500 (not injured)
>500 (not injured)

:lol:

Worst strawman ever.

:lol:


what is it you think i'm trying and failing to show?

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #307 on: September 28, 2011, 07:13:58 AM »
I think you are trying to show that Bryce isn't an outlier, but he clearly is from that list. 8 of the 10 guys on the list have 25+ carries, and 6 of them have 50+ carries.   4 of 10 "suck"? That's just stupid. I'd be totally fine if he had 25 carries in 3 games. At least then we might have a realistic picture of how good he is. Judging from the list, Snyder could be getting a lot more production from him than he is.

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7175
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #308 on: September 28, 2011, 07:20:49 AM »
I'm going tuck on this one, I blame Bryce.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline PoetWarrior

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #309 on: September 28, 2011, 08:00:14 AM »
We're all different.

Online pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #310 on: September 28, 2011, 08:00:19 AM »
hubert is the better back.  sorry if that hurts some of you star gazers.

b-money brown is nothing but an infection.  should be his nickname.  kick him off and ban him from the complex, also ban him from any contact with current players so the infection doesn't spread.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline J

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1150
  • Just call me "Hollywood"
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #311 on: September 28, 2011, 08:03:06 AM »
Mods, can we move this thread to "GPC thread about Pease", but change the name to "GPC thread about Bryce"?

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #312 on: September 28, 2011, 08:07:03 AM »
I think you are trying to show that Bryce isn't an outlier, but he clearly is from that list. 8 of the 10 guys on the list have 25+ carries, and 6 of them have 50+ carries.   4 of 10 "suck"? That's just stupid. I'd be totally fine if he had 25 carries in 3 games. At least then we might have a realistic picture of how good he is. Judging from the list, Snyder could be getting a lot more production from him than he is.

not a strawman, then.   it seems to me that most people weren't expecting meh bryce any more than they were expecting crap bryce.  you're too wrapped up in you're anti snyder agenda.  wgaf about carries?  he's a bust.  that's all that matters.  but busts shouldn't be all that surprising.  they happen.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #313 on: September 28, 2011, 08:15:52 AM »
I think you are trying to show that Bryce isn't an outlier, but he clearly is from that list. 8 of the 10 guys on the list have 25+ carries, and 6 of them have 50+ carries.   4 of 10 "suck"? That's just stupid. I'd be totally fine if he had 25 carries in 3 games. At least then we might have a realistic picture of how good he is. Judging from the list, Snyder could be getting a lot more production from him than he is.

not a strawman, then.   it seems to me that most people weren't expecting meh bryce any more than they were expecting crap bryce.  you're too wrapped up in you're anti snyder agenda.  wgaf about carries?  he's a bust.  that's all that matters.  but busts shouldn't be all that surprising.  they happen.

The problem with the "he's a bust" argument is he performed pretty well at UT as a true freshman. He would be a productive player, at worst, if given the touches.

Offline Harry Dunne

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 246
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #314 on: September 28, 2011, 08:18:22 AM »
I think you are trying to show that Bryce isn't an outlier, but he clearly is from that list. 8 of the 10 guys on the list have 25+ carries, and 6 of them have 50+ carries.   4 of 10 "suck"? That's just stupid. I'd be totally fine if he had 25 carries in 3 games. At least then we might have a realistic picture of how good he is. Judging from the list, Snyder could be getting a lot more production from him than he is.

not a strawman, then.   it seems to me that most people weren't expecting meh bryce any more than they were expecting crap bryce.  you're too wrapped up in you're anti snyder agenda.  wgaf about carries?  he's a bust.  that's all that matters.  but busts shouldn't be all that surprising.  they happen.

The problem with the "he's a bust" argument is he performed pretty well at UT as a true freshman. He would be a productive player, at worst, if given the touches.

Offline Acceleration Man

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 527
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #315 on: September 28, 2011, 08:35:07 AM »
Personally, I'm looking forward to a lot of  :ksu: reactions while watching him next year.

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #316 on: September 28, 2011, 08:40:46 AM »
I'd be curious to see stats on how many #1 over all rated recruits turned out to be busts.   I mean, #1 overall RB is much different that #1 over all recruit. 
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #317 on: September 28, 2011, 08:45:41 AM »
I think you are trying to show that Bryce isn't an outlier, but he clearly is from that list. 8 of the 10 guys on the list have 25+ carries, and 6 of them have 50+ carries.   4 of 10 "suck"? That's just stupid. I'd be totally fine if he had 25 carries in 3 games. At least then we might have a realistic picture of how good he is. Judging from the list, Snyder could be getting a lot more production from him than he is.

not a strawman, then.   it seems to me that most people weren't expecting meh bryce any more than they were expecting crap bryce.  you're too wrapped up in you're anti snyder agenda.  wgaf about carries?  he's a bust.  that's all that matters.  but busts shouldn't be all that surprising.  they happen.

The problem with the "he's a bust" argument is he performed pretty well at UT as a true freshman. He would be a productive player, at worst, if given the touches.

i think he may have been a bust at ut.  their fans were disappointed.  his stats were accumulated against crap competition.  he was unimpressive against good teams.  he seemed to get his touches mostly because you can't not give the ball to the #1 recruit in the nation fresh on campus.  given the talent they normally bring in, you have to wonder how much playing time he would have gotten had he stayed - especially given the liability of his attitide problem.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #318 on: September 28, 2011, 08:49:05 AM »
I think you are trying to show that Bryce isn't an outlier, but he clearly is from that list. 8 of the 10 guys on the list have 25+ carries, and 6 of them have 50+ carries.   4 of 10 "suck"? That's just stupid. I'd be totally fine if he had 25 carries in 3 games. At least then we might have a realistic picture of how good he is. Judging from the list, Snyder could be getting a lot more production from him than he is.

What kind of legitimate top 10 recruit can't get carries by his third season in college?

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #319 on: September 28, 2011, 08:50:31 AM »
I still think there is plenty of time for Bryce to be a very good player at K-State. The reaction (in all directions) that he isn't some sort of instant success at K-State is a bit over the top. Sometimes even very talented players take a while to figure out what it takes to play at a high level and sometimes their coaches take a while to figure out what buttons to push to get the most out of them. There are so many presumptions being made in this thread its ridiculous.

Offline The Whale

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 975
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #320 on: September 28, 2011, 08:54:08 AM »
my god, it's like when BMW goes fishing.  the respects come out of the woodwork to take the bait

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #321 on: September 28, 2011, 08:54:34 AM »
I think you are trying to show that Bryce isn't an outlier, but he clearly is from that list. 8 of the 10 guys on the list have 25+ carries, and 6 of them have 50+ carries.   4 of 10 "suck"? That's just stupid. I'd be totally fine if he had 25 carries in 3 games. At least then we might have a realistic picture of how good he is. Judging from the list, Snyder could be getting a lot more production from him than he is.

not a strawman, then.   it seems to me that most people weren't expecting meh bryce any more than they were expecting crap bryce.  you're too wrapped up in you're anti snyder agenda.  wgaf about carries?  he's a bust.  that's all that matters.  but busts shouldn't be all that surprising.  they happen.

The problem with the "he's a bust" argument is he performed pretty well at UT as a true freshman. He would be a productive player, at worst, if given the touches.

i think he may have been a bust at ut.  their fans were disappointed.  his stats were accumulated against crap competition.  he was unimpressive against good teams.  he seemed to get his touches mostly because you can't not give the ball to the #1 recruit in the nation fresh on campus.  given the talent they normally bring in, you have to wonder how much playing time he would have gotten had he stayed - especially given the liability of his attitide problem.

He had one good game against WKU, and the rest of his yards were fairly balanced across all levels of competition.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/480207/year/2009/bryce-brown

Even removing the WKU game, the evidence is there that he would be a productive player for KSU, at worst.

I think you are trying to show that Bryce isn't an outlier, but he clearly is from that list. 8 of the 10 guys on the list have 25+ carries, and 6 of them have 50+ carries.   4 of 10 "suck"? That's just stupid. I'd be totally fine if he had 25 carries in 3 games. At least then we might have a realistic picture of how good he is. Judging from the list, Snyder could be getting a lot more production from him than he is.

What kind of legitimate top 10 recruit can't get carries by his third season in college?

The kind that play for LHC Bill Snyder.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #322 on: September 28, 2011, 08:57:40 AM »
There are so many presumptions being made in this thread its ridiculous.

Exactly.  Let's just resolve this baby situation and get Bryce back in the fold.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #323 on: September 28, 2011, 08:59:03 AM »
Personally, I'm looking forward to a lot of  :ksu: reactions while watching him next year.

I am, too.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #324 on: September 28, 2011, 09:07:36 AM »
He had one good game against WKU, and the rest of his yards were fairly balanced across all levels of competition.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/player/gamelog/_/id/480207/year/2009/bryce-brown

Even removing the WKU game, the evidence is there that he would be a productive player for KSU, at worst.

half his yards are against wku, ohio, and memphis.  that's not fairly balanced.  top rated recruits who are meh players are busts.