Author Topic: Bryce  (Read 121642 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #250 on: September 27, 2011, 08:52:05 PM »
I'm fine with setting aside some of the BBBS money to fund the abortion.

Stupid ass posts like this are why I would never donate to your BFKS.    :flush:
I think he was probably kidding.  I don't think he really intended on setting aside charity money to fund an abortion for a child that probably doesn't even exist.



"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #251 on: September 27, 2011, 08:52:36 PM »
I'm fine with setting aside some of the BBBS money to fund the abortion.

Stupid ass posts like this are why I would never donate to your BFKS.    :flush:

It's our BFKS.  You can support JW, BBF$$Kat, Gooch or MIR if you want.  

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #252 on: September 27, 2011, 08:53:22 PM »
I'm fine with setting aside some of the BBBS money to fund the abortion.

Stupid ass posts like this are why I would never donate to your BFKS.    :flush:
I think he was probably kidding.  I don't think he really intended on setting aside charity money to fund an abortion for a child that probably doesn't even exist.



Agreed.  Let's get the stats STRAIGHT before we have BigShotAccountantCat start shifting some numbers around.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #253 on: September 27, 2011, 08:53:36 PM »
 :cheers: Katdaddy
« Last Edit: September 27, 2011, 09:07:17 PM by Sundance_Kid »

Offline kstatefreak42

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2911
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #254 on: September 27, 2011, 08:55:19 PM »
 :lynchmob:
EMAW

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #255 on: September 27, 2011, 08:55:32 PM »
JFC I outed a lot of tucks in a short amount of time. Also a lot of people who struggle with reading comprehension.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #256 on: September 27, 2011, 08:59:31 PM »
JFC I outed a lot of tucks in a short amount of time. Also a lot of people who struggle with reading comprehension.
:bait:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #257 on: September 27, 2011, 09:02:42 PM »
JFC I outed a lot of tucks in a short amount of time. Also a lot of people who struggle with reading comprehension.
Please explain.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #258 on: September 27, 2011, 09:05:47 PM »
jfc 10 pages....someone sum this up for me plz tia


Welcome to Tuckvillle, USA, population goEMAW.com.

:frown:

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13505
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #259 on: September 27, 2011, 09:08:03 PM »
jfc 10 pages....someone sum this up for me plz tia


Welcome to Tuckvillle, USA, population goEMAW.com.

:frown:
I think on page 2 of this thread I called this. Very sad day.

Offline opcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 125
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #260 on: September 27, 2011, 09:10:23 PM »
Lazy punk was rivals no.1 rb too.   LOL.

pos.
MY NIGGA

Offline J

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1150
  • Just call me "Hollywood"
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #261 on: September 27, 2011, 09:33:26 PM »
Lazy punk was rivals no.1 rb too.   LOL.

pos.

Reported for off-topic post.

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #262 on: September 27, 2011, 09:40:46 PM »
JFC I outed a lot of tucks in a short amount of time. Also a lot of people who struggle with reading comprehension.
Please explain.

My counterpoint was mainly that Snyds has had several talents come through the system that magically had issues the staff in no way knew about before.
I don't think Snyder is a terrible coach (in season). I think he has trouble reaching and motivating players that are incredibly talented and because of that don't have what he deems a proper work ethic.

Simply pointing this out brings people like you out of the woodwork.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13505
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #263 on: September 27, 2011, 09:46:50 PM »
 :flush:

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #264 on: September 27, 2011, 09:48:00 PM »
JFC I outed a lot of tucks in a short amount of time. Also a lot of people who struggle with reading comprehension.
Please explain.

My counterpoint was mainly that Snyds has had several talents come through the system that magically had issues the staff in no way knew about before.
I don't think Snyder is a terrible coach (in season). I think he has trouble reaching and motivating players that are incredibly talented and because of that don't have what he deems a proper work ethic.

Simply pointing this out brings people like you out of the woodwork.

Can you name one or two coaches who do reach and motivate the players that are incredibly talented but don't have what LHC Bill Snyder would deem a proper work ethic?

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #265 on: September 27, 2011, 09:53:47 PM »
Hey Chingon

why don't you start an investigation on those who are really killing this site :surprised:

Offline Stupid Fitz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6838
  • Go Cats
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #266 on: September 27, 2011, 09:59:26 PM »
So did the old man make him quit or not?

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #267 on: September 27, 2011, 10:01:02 PM »
JFC I outed a lot of tucks in a short amount of time. Also a lot of people who struggle with reading comprehension.
Please explain.

My counterpoint was mainly that Snyds has had several talents come through the system that magically had issues the staff in no way knew about before.
I don't think Snyder is a terrible coach (in season). I think he has trouble reaching and motivating players that are incredibly talented and because of that don't have what he deems a proper work ethic.

Simply pointing this out brings people like you out of the woodwork.

Can you name one or two coaches who do reach and motivate the players that are incredibly talented but don't have what LHC Bill Snyder would deem a proper work ethic?

Lane Kiffin? Pete Carrol? Mack Brown up until last year?

Again, I'm not saying that it's Snyder's fault with BB, but there's a reason those coaches get top talent and win with all kinds of head cases. And sometimes it's realizing that they are special and just letting them do their thing on game day.

As much as Snyder does cater to talent, that's the one area where he gets all righteous about and I've never really understood why, since in the end the ultimate goal is to just win some rough ridin' games.

Maybe BB is a headcase. Maybe he doesn't have the talent to be lazy. I don't know, but I do know there are coaches out there who have been successful with lazy star players. Hell Snyder was once one of them, otherwise Bishop would have never taken a snap at K-State.

Offline J

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1150
  • Just call me "Hollywood"
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #268 on: September 27, 2011, 10:03:25 PM »
So did the old man make him quit or not?

No. He's not leaving.

(I'm using the assumption he wants to have some kind of career in the NFL, like any normal NFL caliber athlete would).

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #269 on: September 27, 2011, 10:04:06 PM »
The only difference between what Snyder does and what Stoops, Brown, Saban, etc do is that Snyder doesn't have a bunch of other 5*s on the team.  When a lazy POS 5* kid is stuck 3 deep on the OU bench, people just assume the two 5*s ahead of him are better players.  If you really think the top coaches in the country coddle the lazy POS's and FP's, you are a rough ridin' idiot.  You really think Saban would take Bryce aside and excuse him for missing every single freaking off season workout?  eff no he wouldn't, he'd bury his ass on the depth chart and work with the kids that are doing the right stuff and trying to make the team and themselves better.

Offline _33

  • The Inventor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10540
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #270 on: September 27, 2011, 10:06:54 PM »
The only difference between what Snyder does and what Stoops, Brown, Saban, etc do is that Snyder doesn't have a bunch of other 5*s on the team.  When a lazy POS 5* kid is stuck 3 deep on the OU bench, people just assume the two 5*s ahead of him are better players.  If you really think the top coaches in the country coddle the lazy POS's and FP's, you are a rough ridin' idiot.  You really think Saban would take Bryce aside and excuse him for missing every single freaking off season workout?  eff no he wouldn't, he'd bury his ass on the depth chart and work with the kids that are doing the right stuff and trying to make the team and themselves better.

Easy decision to bench lazy 5* in favor of hard working 5*. But all of them would play lazy 5* over hard working 3*.

Offline J

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1150
  • Just call me "Hollywood"
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #271 on: September 27, 2011, 10:09:27 PM »
The only difference between what Snyder does and what Stoops, Brown, Saban, etc do is that Snyder doesn't have a bunch of other 5*s on the team.  When a lazy POS 5* kid is stuck 3 deep on the OU bench, people just assume the two 5*s ahead of him are better players.  If you really think the top coaches in the country coddle the lazy POS's and FP's, you are a rough ridin' idiot.  You really think Saban would take Bryce aside and excuse him for missing every single freaking off season workout?  eff no he wouldn't, he'd bury his ass on the depth chart and work with the kids that are doing the right stuff and trying to make the team and themselves better.

Easy decision to bench lazy 5* in favor of hard working 5*. But all of them would play lazy 5* over hard working 3*.

[citation needed]

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53907
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #272 on: September 27, 2011, 10:10:55 PM »
I'm fine with setting aside some of the BBBS money to fund the abortion.

I have a friend from Ontario who would throw an additional $100 in for this.

#teambryce#

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #273 on: September 27, 2011, 10:13:09 PM »
I'm fine with setting aside some of the BBBS money to fund the abortion.

I have a friend from Ontario who would throw an additional $100 in for this.

#teambryce#

 :kstatriot:  <-- but a Canadian flag with a powercat where the maple leaf goes

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #274 on: September 27, 2011, 10:16:01 PM »

Easy decision to bench lazy 5* in favor of hard working 5*. But all of them would play lazy 5* over hard working 3*.

Thanks for the dumbed-down version of what I was getting at. I mean does anyone on here really believe John rough ridin' Hubert is better at running with the football than BB. Not blocking, not trying hard, just running the the rough ridin' football.