Author Topic: Ron Paul moneybomb.  (Read 9281 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #25 on: August 23, 2011, 03:09:09 PM »
You are so damn delusional.

It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.


Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.

Who are you voting for?

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #26 on: August 23, 2011, 03:12:47 PM »
You are so damn delusional.

It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.


Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.

Who are you voting for?

This is what I was going to ask. Probably Obama or Perry. Two excellent choices, but which one will run us into the ground faster?

Offline the KHAN!

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1574
  • The Prince of Darkness and Sorrow
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #27 on: August 23, 2011, 03:20:38 PM »
You are so damn delusional.

It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.


Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.

Who are you voting for?

I, not being Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), have not decided a full year in advance of the election.
The Scheme Doctor
Up the Banana Wall

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #28 on: August 23, 2011, 03:27:46 PM »
You are so damn delusional.

It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.


Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.

Who are you voting for?

I, not being Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!), have not decided a full year in advance of the election.

The Kansas primary is in 6 months, and the candidates are Ron Paul (at least he's honest), Perry (his strategy as Governor was to pray for rain rather than actually do something about Texas' growing water problems), Michelle Bachmann (either a liar, or very stupid, probably a little bit of both), and Mitt Romney (hypocrite). I will be voting for Ron Paul, but if he were not an option, I would probably also still be undecided.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2011, 03:30:01 PM by Nuts Kicked »

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #29 on: August 23, 2011, 03:30:53 PM »
Yeah Ron Paul is the only real choice. Everyone else is a corporate owned snake in the grass, and if you can't see that you are lying to yourself.

Offline the KHAN!

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1574
  • The Prince of Darkness and Sorrow
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #30 on: August 23, 2011, 05:22:57 PM »
I assure you, Bachmann and Perry are about as unvotable as Paul in my opinion.
The Scheme Doctor
Up the Banana Wall

Offline Dingo

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 252
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #31 on: August 23, 2011, 05:28:43 PM »
You are so damn delusional.

It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.


Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.

Who are you voting for?

This is what I was going to ask. Probably Obama or Perry. Two excellent choices, but which one will run us into the ground faster?

Gotta love the 7 ways Perry will change the Constitution.  Anyone seen those?
I'm not a psychopath.  I'm a high-functioning sociopath.  Do your research.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #32 on: August 23, 2011, 05:49:19 PM »
You are so damn delusional.

It's amazing how you've managed to figure it all out, just like the right honorable crazy uncle Ron.


Have fun voting for someone who I could see very easily winning an election in the Confederate States of America.

Who are you voting for?

This is what I was going to ask. Probably Obama or Perry. Two excellent choices, but which one will run us into the ground faster?

Gotta love the 7 ways Perry will change the Constitution.  Anyone seen those?

Yeah. Term limits for supreme court justices is something I could probably be convinced to get behind, but I'm not too fond of the other 6.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #33 on: August 23, 2011, 06:25:14 PM »
Yeah, I think I'd rather him run and get like 2 percent of the vote in the primary like he did last time.

Ron Paul is much more relevant than you think.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/obama_39_paul_38


Gallup ran a poll with Obama v. 4 GOP'ers, including Paul.

Among registered voters Obama is statistically tied with Paul, Perry, and Romney.  Paul is just as relevant as any of the mainstream GOP candidates.

Obama is so awful, he's barely beating Bachman.  :lol:

http://www.businessinsider.com/shock-poll-obama-tied-with-romney-perry-paul-in-new-poll-2011-8


goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7639
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #34 on: August 23, 2011, 07:19:54 PM »
Yeah, I think I'd rather him run and get like 2 percent of the vote in the primary like he did last time.

Ron Paul is much more relevant than you think.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/obama_39_paul_38


Gallup ran a poll with Obama v. 4 GOP'ers, including Paul.

Among registered voters Obama is statistically tied with Paul, Perry, and Romney.  Paul is just as relevant as any of the mainstream GOP candidates.

Obama is so awful, he's barely beating Bachman.  :lol:

http://www.businessinsider.com/shock-poll-obama-tied-with-romney-perry-paul-in-new-poll-2011-8




I think we are about to have a repeat of the 2008 mantra with a name change --- "Anybody but Obama"

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15859
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #35 on: August 23, 2011, 08:13:24 PM »
Dr. Paul is putting out great campaign ads this time around.  It is great to see him with a real, focused campaign.  The website is top-notch too.

Ad 1 "Conviction"



Ad 2 "The one"

If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30437
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #36 on: August 23, 2011, 08:48:18 PM »
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office?  Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.


<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline the KHAN!

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1574
  • The Prince of Darkness and Sorrow
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #37 on: August 23, 2011, 11:49:45 PM »
Honestly, it's a repeat of 2008, as someone mentioned. It's just one big overreaction.  I seriously doubt anything Paul is going to run on will ever happen, even if elected, (sounds a lot like Obama) because he would still need congress to agree with him. That won't happen. 
The Scheme Doctor
Up the Banana Wall

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #38 on: August 24, 2011, 12:10:54 AM »
Honestly, it's a repeat of 2008, as someone mentioned. It's just one big overreaction.  I seriously doubt anything Paul is going to run on will ever happen, even if elected, (sounds a lot like Obama) because he would still need congress to agree with him. That won't happen. 

Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #39 on: August 24, 2011, 12:17:41 AM »
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office?  Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.


<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country

Ok you won't be voting for Paul, which corporate owned fascist will you be voting for, clown?

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30437
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #40 on: August 24, 2011, 07:20:44 AM »
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office?  Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.


<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country

Ok you won't be voting for Paul, which corporate owned fascist will you be voting for, clown?



When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #41 on: August 24, 2011, 09:58:52 PM »
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office?  Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.


<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country

Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30437
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #42 on: August 24, 2011, 10:10:09 PM »
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office?  Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.


<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country

Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?

Far better
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #43 on: August 24, 2011, 10:14:42 PM »
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office?  Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.


<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country

Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?

Far better

You know this has recently been proven factually inaccurate?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30437
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #44 on: August 24, 2011, 10:15:28 PM »
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office?  Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.


<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country

Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?

Far better

You know this has recently been proven factually inaccurate?

yes
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #45 on: August 24, 2011, 10:19:12 PM »
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office?  Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.


<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country

Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?

Far better

You know this has recently been proven factually inaccurate?

yes

Well, I'm not sure what to make of this.

Should we talk about something else now?

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30437
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #46 on: August 24, 2011, 10:20:12 PM »
So let me get this straight you clowns want to elect a president that would be damn near 78 at the time he takes office?  Old age would probably get him quicker than the mossad.


<----- does not want Pat Summit Sr. running the country

Having a young, inexperienced, naive, pompous, sycophant who has the respect of no one is better?

Far better

You know this has recently been proven factually inaccurate?

yes

Well, I'm not sure what to make of this.

Should we talk about something else now?

no
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline the KHAN!

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1574
  • The Prince of Darkness and Sorrow
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #47 on: August 25, 2011, 01:24:04 AM »
Quote
Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.

They hold the purse strings, and thus have a pretty damn good hold on Foreign policy as well. The President is not our Foreign Policy master.
The Scheme Doctor
Up the Banana Wall

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #48 on: August 25, 2011, 01:36:10 AM »
Quote
Congress only has to agree with him on the social and economic issues. They don't have much say in foreign policy.

They hold the purse strings, and thus have a pretty damn good hold on Foreign policy as well. The President is not our Foreign Policy master.

Every war since WWII disagrees, as does the war powers act.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2011, 01:51:00 AM by pike »

Offline the KHAN!

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1574
  • The Prince of Darkness and Sorrow
    • View Profile
Re: Ron Paul moneybomb.
« Reply #49 on: August 25, 2011, 02:07:45 AM »
So glad Bush set a precedent of just invading without congressional approval.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Resolution

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_war_by_the_United_States

There is a nice list of conflicts after the list of declared wars that have been authorized by Congress.
The Scheme Doctor
Up the Banana Wall