Author Topic: Tanner Burns (Read 6637 times)

steve dave · « **on:** August 03, 2011, 10:37:00 AM »

is gone according to GPC facebook stalker guy

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #1 on:** August 03, 2011, 10:38:30 AM »

FP/TC

PorkChop Express · « **Reply #2 on:** August 03, 2011, 10:58:37 AM »

Quote from: steve dave on August 03, 2011, 10:37:00 AM

is gone according to GPC facebook stalker guy

I guess he wants to sit out two consecutive years.

His team gear collection will be good at least.

kim carnes · « **Reply #3 on:** August 03, 2011, 11:03:48 AM »

Quote from: steve dave on August 03, 2011, 10:37:00 AM

is gone according to GPC facebook stalker guy

eff. This guy was going to be a superstar.

wetwillie · « **Reply #4 on:** August 03, 2011, 11:04:59 AM »

i hope this means a shakeup in the clams burner team

CNS · « **Reply #5 on:** August 03, 2011, 11:05:15 AM »

God Damnit

PoetWarrior · « **Reply #6 on:** August 03, 2011, 11:46:53 AM »

Don't confuse Morgan and Tanner.

wetwillie · « **Reply #7 on:** August 03, 2011, 11:57:52 AM »

Quote from: PoetWarrior on August 03, 2011, 11:46:53 AM

Don't confuse Morgan and Tanner.

o man. i'm guilty. i feel so ashamed

MadCat · « **Reply #8 on:** August 03, 2011, 12:00:25 PM »

He must really like his dad.

KITNfury · « **Reply #9 on:** August 03, 2011, 12:09:07 PM »

My inside source says he tweeted:

Quote

"Back to School" 15 minutes ago.

DQ12 · « **Reply #10 on:** August 03, 2011, 12:10:50 PM »

Addition by subtraction. Good riddance. etc.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #11 on:** August 03, 2011, 12:25:07 PM »

Kids are realizing that Bill won't fire their dad even if they leave.

steve dave · « **Reply #12 on:** August 03, 2011, 01:14:45 PM »

ksu confirmed he's no longer on the team

Winters · « **Reply #13 on:** August 03, 2011, 01:28:37 PM »

Tysyn Hartman

hemmy · « **Reply #14 on:** August 03, 2011, 01:31:06 PM »

was he any good or junk?

The Manhatter · « **Reply #15 on:** August 03, 2011, 01:31:15 PM »

non-issue. i didn't have the kid any higher on my depth charts after seeing him in spring game. no loss = non-issue.

Winters · « **Reply #16 on:** August 03, 2011, 01:34:28 PM »

Logan Dold

steve dave · « **Reply #17 on:** August 03, 2011, 02:01:21 PM »

Quote from: hemmy on August 03, 2011, 01:31:06 PM

was he any good or junk?

he led San Jose in tackles as a frosh iirc

we weren't very good at tackles last year

kostakio · « **Reply #18 on:** August 03, 2011, 03:36:19 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on August 03, 2011, 02:01:21 PM

Quote from: hemmy on August 03, 2011, 01:31:06 PM
was he any good or junk?

he led San Jose in tackles as a frosh iirc we weren't very good at tackles last year

San Jose had a similar type of defense the year he played to what we had last year. Maybe even worse if that is possible. Anyway safety's make a lot of tackles on bad defenses look at who our leading tacklers were last season.

MixBerryCrunch · « **Reply #19 on:** August 03, 2011, 05:01:06 PM »

Quote from: kostakio on August 03, 2011, 03:36:19 PM

Quote from: steve dave on August 03, 2011, 02:01:21 PM
Quote from: hemmy on August 03, 2011, 01:31:06 PM
was he any good or junk?

he led San Jose in tackles as a frosh iirc we weren't very good at tackles last year

San Jose had a similar type of defense the year he played to what we had last year. Maybe even worse if that is possible. Anyway safety's make a lot of tackles on bad defenses look at who our leading tacklers were last season.

So basically that means as a Frosh he was as good as Garret was last year. I'd take it.

kim carnes · « **Reply #20 on:** August 03, 2011, 05:53:21 PM »

Quote from: The Manhatter on August 03, 2011, 01:31:15 PM

non-issue. i didn't have the kid any higher on my depth charts after seeing him in spring game. no loss = non-issue.

dumbass. this guy would have looked like Ed Reed compared to the rest of our defensive backfield. he was destined to be a superstar imo.

Stupid Fitz · « **Reply #21 on:** August 03, 2011, 05:56:33 PM »

Probably wasn't doing things the "right way" and stuff

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #22 on:** August 03, 2011, 07:21:49 PM »

Is this the kid whose dad is on staff? If so, fire that guy now. Not later, now

'taterblast · « **Reply #23 on:** August 03, 2011, 10:02:10 PM »

Quote from: kim carnes on August 03, 2011, 05:53:21 PM

Quote from: The Manhatter on August 03, 2011, 01:31:15 PM
non-issue. i didn't have the kid any higher on my depth charts after seeing him in spring game. no loss = non-issue.

dumbass. this guy would have looked like Ed Reed compared to the rest of our defensive backfield. he was destined to be a superstar imo.

you serious?

kim carnes · « **Reply #24 on:** August 03, 2011, 10:12:23 PM »

Quote from: emawblast on August 03, 2011, 10:02:10 PM

Quote from: kim carnes on August 03, 2011, 05:53:21 PM
Quote from: The Manhatter on August 03, 2011, 01:31:15 PM
non-issue. i didn't have the kid any higher on my depth charts after seeing him in spring game. no loss = non-issue.

dumbass. this guy would have looked like Ed Reed compared to the rest of our defensive backfield. he was destined to be a superstar imo.

you serious?

Why would I not be serious? Our safeties were rough ridin' terrible last year. rough ridin' terrible. Will take anyone who can get Tysyn Hartman off the field. Will rough ridin' take.