0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Without reading any of the garbage, I wonder why the main stream media, who is only really concerned with ratings, would not want to run these stories?
Quote from: Saulbadguy on June 21, 2011, 04:31:19 PMWithout reading any of the garbage, I wonder why the main stream media, who is only really concerned with ratings, would not want to run these stories?Because they're ran by globalist douche bags, who know that reporting on American Idol and Bristol Palin is more entertaining....and sure enough people eat it up.
Quote from: pike on June 21, 2011, 04:33:20 PMQuote from: Saulbadguy on June 21, 2011, 04:31:19 PMWithout reading any of the garbage, I wonder why the main stream media, who is only really concerned with ratings, would not want to run these stories?Because they're ran by globalist douche bags, who know that reporting on American Idol and Bristol Palin is more entertaining....and sure enough people eat it up. you are such a tool
Quote from: OK_Cat on June 21, 2011, 04:35:27 PMQuote from: pike on June 21, 2011, 04:33:20 PMQuote from: Saulbadguy on June 21, 2011, 04:31:19 PMWithout reading any of the garbage, I wonder why the main stream media, who is only really concerned with ratings, would not want to run these stories?Because they're ran by globalist douche bags, who know that reporting on American Idol and Bristol Palin is more entertaining....and sure enough people eat it up. you are such a tool Well, it's true. Same reason reality TV has taken over pretty much every channel. There's more money in that than something you can actually learn from. I mean, even History and Discovery have bought into it.
Quote from: pike on June 21, 2011, 04:38:21 PMQuote from: OK_Cat on June 21, 2011, 04:35:27 PMQuote from: pike on June 21, 2011, 04:33:20 PMQuote from: Saulbadguy on June 21, 2011, 04:31:19 PMWithout reading any of the garbage, I wonder why the main stream media, who is only really concerned with ratings, would not want to run these stories?Because they're ran by globalist douche bags, who know that reporting on American Idol and Bristol Palin is more entertaining....and sure enough people eat it up. you are such a tool Well, it's true. Same reason reality TV has taken over pretty much every channel. There's more money in that than something you can actually learn from. I mean, even History and Discovery have bought into it. JFC.Reality TV is cheaper than a sitcom. Period. Also, it's not like pre reality TV programing was educational.
Quote from: CNS Casey on June 21, 2011, 04:40:45 PMQuote from: pike on June 21, 2011, 04:38:21 PMQuote from: OK_Cat on June 21, 2011, 04:35:27 PMQuote from: pike on June 21, 2011, 04:33:20 PMQuote from: Saulbadguy on June 21, 2011, 04:31:19 PMWithout reading any of the garbage, I wonder why the main stream media, who is only really concerned with ratings, would not want to run these stories?Because they're ran by globalist douche bags, who know that reporting on American Idol and Bristol Palin is more entertaining....and sure enough people eat it up. you are such a tool Well, it's true. Same reason reality TV has taken over pretty much every channel. There's more money in that than something you can actually learn from. I mean, even History and Discovery have bought into it. JFC.Reality TV is cheaper than a sitcom. Period. Also, it's not like pre reality TV programing was educational. What does reality TV being cheaper than a sitcom have to do with what I'm saying? I'm saying it makes a crap load of money, which is why everyone has migrated towards it....leaving behind anything thought provoking or educational, which yes did exist before the pre-reality era.
Quote from: pike on June 21, 2011, 04:33:20 PMQuote from: Saulbadguy on June 21, 2011, 04:31:19 PMWithout reading any of the garbage, I wonder why the main stream media, who is only really concerned with ratings, would not want to run these stories?Because they're ran by globalist douche bags, who know that reporting on American Idol and Bristol Palin is more entertaining....and sure enough people eat it up. So the globalists are cool w/ reporting on some controversial things, just not all of them?I don't get it.
Not that I'd ever rely on any 3 of these for "breaking news" or w/e...but if Fox is the most accurate, albeit ~40% clip, we're so beyond effed it doesn't matter anyway http://reason.com/blog/2011/06/21/is-jon-stewart-correct-that-fo?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reason%2FHitandRun+%28Reason+Online+-+Hit+%26+Run+Blog%29
Quote from: MeatSauce on June 21, 2011, 04:57:48 PMNot that I'd ever rely on any 3 of these for "breaking news" or w/e...but if Fox is the most accurate, albeit ~40% clip, we're so beyond effed it doesn't matter anyway http://reason.com/blog/2011/06/21/is-jon-stewart-correct-that-fo?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reason%2FHitandRun+%28Reason+Online+-+Hit+%26+Run+Blog%29No, they didn't say Fox was the most accurate. They said their viewers were more 'informed'. That simply means that they can regurgitate more facts.I'm not surprised. A lot of folks that watch Fox shows are religious in their devotion to the channel and the time slot. Most of my family members that watch Fox News have it on in the background nearly three or four hours a day. While I, conversely, watch an hour of Anderson Cooper and call it good*.*Except on the weekends when I watch Meet the Press, State of the Union, and GPS.
They said their viewers were more 'informed'.