Poll

Should we ban all socks?

yes
no
only the bad ones

Author Topic: Banning of Socks  (Read 17958 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline threadrater

  • rating threads so you don't have to
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #50 on: April 27, 2011, 11:16:34 AM »
F MOTHERFUCKING MINUS

Offline The Laundromat

  • Administrator
  • Fan
  • *****
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #51 on: April 27, 2011, 01:19:02 PM »
 :users:

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19302
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #52 on: April 27, 2011, 02:54:15 PM »
 :ck:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #53 on: April 27, 2011, 03:29:24 PM »
I always thought that Steve Dave was Saul The Jew's sock?

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #54 on: April 27, 2011, 04:16:32 PM »

Offline SonofLeonPatton

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • What's shaking?
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #55 on: April 27, 2011, 04:36:26 PM »
eff 'em. Ban 'em.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #56 on: April 27, 2011, 04:39:57 PM »
I'm sorry, Chingon. I'm afraid I cannot allow that to happen.



So......



 :dunno:

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #57 on: April 27, 2011, 04:40:53 PM »

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6268
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #58 on: April 27, 2011, 06:07:50 PM »
wow. good job everyone.

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #59 on: April 28, 2011, 11:23:09 AM »
Just to clear the air. I'm not a sock. I'm real
RIP Fatty

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #60 on: April 28, 2011, 11:27:12 AM »
Just to clear the air. I'm not a sock. I'm real

sounds like something a sock would say

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #61 on: April 28, 2011, 01:23:33 PM »
I'm thinking about 3 unique posters have posted in this thread. Maybe 4.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #62 on: April 28, 2011, 03:23:02 PM »
Just to clear the air. I'm not a sock. I'm real

a poster with quotes around their name has to be a sock.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16212
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #63 on: April 28, 2011, 03:56:34 PM »
I'm thinking about 3 unique posters have posted in this thread. Maybe 4.

i'm a trim sock

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #64 on: April 28, 2011, 09:49:32 PM »
I'm thinking about 3 unique posters have posted in this thread. Maybe 4.

You're only contributing to my identity crisis.

Offline Poster formerly known as jthutch

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1765
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #65 on: April 29, 2011, 01:43:45 PM »
I pretty much always wear socks so if they get banned I don't know what I would do.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7640
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #66 on: April 29, 2011, 07:18:36 PM »
I pretty much always wear socks so if they get banned I don't know what I would do.

Same here. Shoes get really smelly without socks.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #67 on: April 29, 2011, 07:43:32 PM »
Have a pair of Steve Madden boat shoes that have some sort of special liner so you can wear them barefoot.  I've worn them like 3 times and they're now the only stinky shoes I have.  Good thing I'm so incredibly rich or I would be mad about wasting that kind of money.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13753
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #68 on: May 02, 2011, 12:22:06 PM »
You are all figments of my imagination.  In fact, I am in an asylum, staring at a wall, thinking that I'm actually typing at a keyboard...or maybe I'm a recruit staring at OB's wall.  I'm thinking of committing.  Go Cats.  :goodbyecruelworld:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19133
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #69 on: July 30, 2011, 11:40:48 AM »
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.
:adios:

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #70 on: July 30, 2011, 12:14:59 PM »
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

the fact that i've been able to post as steve dave and rick daris for the past three years is pretty amazing though you have to admit.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85347
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #71 on: July 30, 2011, 12:18:23 PM »
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses

Offline KSUBrian

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 815
  • Weird Robert is #1
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #72 on: July 30, 2011, 12:25:52 PM »
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses

You're right.  I am not a sock. :drink: :driving:

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19133
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #73 on: July 30, 2011, 01:20:55 PM »
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses

Oh no. This is a worse problem. My goodness.
:adios:

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: Banning of Socks
« Reply #74 on: July 30, 2011, 05:52:38 PM »
Well, I not a fan of sock banning in general, but we may need to look at this again.  goEMAW used to be a place where we could come and intelligently discuss the goings on of Kansas State sports, and anything else that EMAW elites like to talk about.  Now there are so many socks that the goEMAW we all know and love may never return.   Anyone seen I, Robot? Instead of robots, we have socks trying to take over and ruin everything. We need some mod to step up and be our Del Spooner (Will Smith) to crush this sock rebellion.

there really aren't as many as you think.  there are a couple obvious ones but most of the dumbasses that you think are socks are just dumbasses

Oh no. This is a worse problem. My goodness.

So there needs to be a banning of dumbasses then. Simple as that.