Author Topic: expansion  (Read 1750 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
expansion
« on: March 28, 2011, 08:38:47 AM »
i guess it's safe to say tourney expansion is a gigantic success. 

expand to 72 next year:  last 8 automatic bids and last 8 at-large bids have to play 1st round?  :excited:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline 1albatross

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2011, 08:50:06 AM »
Still don't like it, but I am afraid you are right.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2011, 08:57:19 AM »
why go so slow?  i'd like to see 256 and another weekend.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1965
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2011, 09:35:31 AM »
why go so slow?  i'd like to see 256 and another weekend.

Yes!

Also, do a 256 team pre-season tournament, and then maybe a small 64 team invitational in August or something in Europe or Canada just to keep the kids sharp.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2011, 09:37:36 AM »
why go so slow?  i'd like to see 256 and another weekend.

Yes!

Also, do a 256 team pre-season tournament, and then maybe a small 64 team invitational in August or something in Europe or Canada just to keep the kids sharp.

WTF?

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2011, 09:40:58 AM »
why go so slow?  i'd like to see 256 and another weekend.

how about 128 w/ a final 8 instead of final 4

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2011, 09:48:24 AM »
why go so slow?  i'd like to see 256 and another weekend.

how about 128 w/ a final 8 instead of final 4

double elimination final 8

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2011, 10:27:33 AM »
how about 128 w/ a final 8 instead of final 4

 :bracketmouse:
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40533
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2011, 10:28:29 AM »
double elimination final 8

no, denied on double elimination.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2011, 10:42:23 AM »
double elimination final 8

no, denied on double elimination.

yeah, i was stretching there.   single elimination is definitely the most enjoyable for spectators.  but double elimination final 8 could last a whole week w/ games every day.

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1965
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: expansion
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2011, 10:51:34 AM »
why go so slow?  i'd like to see 256 and another weekend.

Yes!

Also, do a 256 team pre-season tournament, and then maybe a small 64 team invitational in August or something in Europe or Canada just to keep the kids sharp.

WTF?

I want in on that Texas recruiting pipeline.