Where's all the butt hurt tea partiers?

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

I think it's awesome that all libs can do at this point is attempt to distinguish Obama from Bush.  The same Bush they all said was the worst president ever.

 

Bush was a horrible president. Obama isn't much better. He might be even worse, if given enough time. What is your point?

The real problem is he is MUCH worse than Bush for the country.  Not only is he continuing most of the Bush policies, he is spending us into bankruptcy. HE IS Bush on steroids, but the libs just follow blindly and silently.

[Bookcat]

the libs just follow blindly and silently.

no we don't. I don't like Obama....haven't decided on voting for him again.

Your point?

[LickNeckey]

don't really support the action in Libya or "military Operations" in Iraq however they were not exactly created equally

1. our actions in Libya have been to impose a no fly zone to meet a UN Resolution to stop violence against civilians in Libya.  acting as a member of NATO with capabilities in the region we repositioned part of the 5th fleet and strategically bombed anti-air targets and used limited air support to control airspace.  these actions marked the begining of interventions that we are supposed to be turning over to NATO allies including Turkey with widespread support from the arab league

2. Iraq - we went in all cowboy with the "shock" and the "awe" cause that nutless U.N. wasn't gun do nuthin and let that crazy ass Sadam kill our babies with mustard gas and nukes through his numerous connections to terrorsim

* if we are still in Libya in 10 years i will apologize for my sarcasm

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

don't really support the action in Libya or "military Operations" in Iraq however they were not exactly created equally

1. our actions in Libya have been to impose a no fly zone to meet a UN Resolution to stop violence against civilians in Libya.  acting as a member of NATO with capabilities in the region we repositioned part of the 5th fleet and strategically bombed anti-air targets and used limited air support to control airspace.  these actions marked the begining of interventions that we are supposed to be turning over to NATO allies including Turkey with widespread support from the arab league

2. Iraq - we went in all cowboy with the "shock" and the "awe" cause that nutless U.N. wasn't gun do nuthin and let that crazy ass Sadam kill our babies with mustard gas and nukes through his numerous connections to terrorsim

* if we are still in Libya in 10 years i will apologize for my sarcasm

Iraq had a 40 country coalition, only 15 countries have taken part in Libya.

[pike]

don't really support the action in Libya or "military Operations" in Iraq however they were not exactly created equally

1. our actions in Libya have been to impose a no fly zone to meet a UN Resolution to stop violence against civilians in Libya.  acting as a member of NATO with capabilities in the region we repositioned part of the 5th fleet and strategically bombed anti-air targets and used limited air support to control airspace.  these actions marked the begining of interventions that we are supposed to be turning over to NATO allies including Turkey with widespread support from the arab league

2. Iraq - we went in all cowboy with the "shock" and the "awe" cause that nutless U.N. wasn't gun do nuthin and let that crazy ass Sadam kill our babies with mustard gas and nukes through his numerous connections to terrorsim

* if we are still in Libya in 10 years i will apologize for my sarcasm

Would not bet against this

[Rage Against the McKee]

don't really support the action in Libya or "military Operations" in Iraq however they were not exactly created equally

1. our actions in Libya have been to impose a no fly zone to meet a UN Resolution to stop violence against civilians in Libya.  acting as a member of NATO with capabilities in the region we repositioned part of the 5th fleet and strategically bombed anti-air targets and used limited air support to control airspace.  these actions marked the begining of interventions that we are supposed to be turning over to NATO allies including Turkey with widespread support from the arab league

2. Iraq - we went in all cowboy with the "shock" and the "awe" cause that nutless U.N. wasn't gun do nuthin and let that crazy ass Sadam kill our babies with mustard gas and nukes through his numerous connections to terrorsim

* if we are still in Libya in 10 years i will apologize for my sarcasm

Iraq had a 40 country coalition, only 15 countries have taken part in Libya.

Irrelevant. The US is providing support in Libya. We drove the war in Iraq. Plus, we spend more on our military than the rest of the world combined. Do you really think support or lack thereof would make any difference to the outcome of any war the US chooses to throw money away on?

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

Irrelevant. The US is providing support in Libya. We drove the war in Iraq.

This is an exercise in semantics and you know it.

Bush was a horrible president. Obama isn't much better. He might be even worse, if given enough time. What is your point?

Two years ago he was the "smartest man ever to take office", "someone who could change the face of Washington", "the messiah", "our savior".  I guess as it turns out, Bush was basically UberSuperGod.

[LickNeckey]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12983054

stopping the widespread slaughter of civilians and either stealing oil or settling a petty pissing contest are about the same i guess   

[the KHAN!]

You realize that Hussein was much worse than Qaddafi don't you?

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12983054

stopping the widespread slaughter of civilians and either stealing oil or settling a petty pissing contest are about the same i guess   

Good use of semantics

[LickNeckey]

thank you