should we have played zone

[fatty fat fat]

nm

[Benja]

Probably, but Frank never will.

[kso_FAN]

Zone would've been worse. JMHO.

[Benja]

Well, our zone would definitely have been worse because our guys probably have no idea what the hell one is.

[wetwillie]

Burks, Higgins, Knutson, and Releforde would have absolutely raped us

[CHONGS]

Our players know how to play zone.

[PowercatPat]

Zone would've been worse. JMHO.

This.

Peterson was a big reason why our defense looked so bad today. A zone would have just opened up the three for Knutson, Burks, and Higgins.

[wes mantooth]

Fatty fat fat fat just owned ksu_fan stat guru know it all in this thread.  Run something different.  They didn't do anything inside, give them a different look.  Any of you retards that think a zone wouldn't have been good, just to change things, need to off yourselves right now.

Or I guess we could just run a lazy man-to-man and get embarassed a third time...oh wait.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

we should have shot about 20 more FT's, because every time we took a layup we got rough ridin' hacked.  oh well, at least we got to watch burks and higgins drain about 20 10-15ft jumpers, just like back in Hickory, IN

[MakeItRain]

Yes we should have made that adjustment at some point.  I don't buy the we would have gotten killed by the three talking point, we have no damn idea how well they would have shot.  CU had their way with dribble drive penetration all game, it was a clinic.  Frank should have changed it up.  Coaches like players aren't perfect and make mistakes.  Oh well, this game didn't mean a damn thing anyway.

[sys]

Peterson was a big reason why our defense looked so bad today.

lol.  keep on 'tarding, powercatpat.

[wes mantooth]

Peterson was a big reason why our defense looked so bad today.

lol.  keep on 'tarding, powercatpat.

while i'll agree powercatpat is a tard, 95 got beat all day of defense.  fact.

[sys]

95 got beat all day of defense.  fact.

it's not a fact.  higgins scoring does not = 95 not defending.

[wes mantooth]

95 got beat all day of defense.  fact.

it's not a fact.  higgins scoring does not = 95 not defending.

that's not what i said.  what the tape, 95 got inside his player's jersey on defense, and then his guy drove right by him...everytime.

[MakeItRain]

Peterson was a big reason why our defense looked so bad today.

lol.  keep on 'tarding, powercatpat.

while i'll agree powercatpat is a tard, 95 got beat all day of defense.  fact.

I'm not a 95 lover like most of the board, but if you think his 11 minutes equates to anything "all day" you're really dumb.  I don't understand why people don't even take 35 seconds to read a box score before posting.

[wes mantooth]

Peterson was a big reason why our defense looked so bad today.

lol.  keep on 'tarding, powercatpat.

while i'll agree powercatpat is a tard, 95 got beat all day of defense.  fact.

I'm not a 95 lover like most of the board, but if you think his 11 minutes equates to anything "all day" you're really dumb.  I don't understand why people don't even take 35 seconds to read a box score before posting.

i don't need to read a boxscore, i was at the game.  the time he was on the floor, which was a lot more than he has been all season, he was getting beat on defense.  but it doesn't matter, that's not what the thread is about it's about should we have tried a zone?  absolutely.

[sys]

that's not what i said.  what the tape, 95 got inside his player's jersey on defense, and then his guy drove right by him...everytime.

if i get bored sometime i may look at a replay, but even without doing so, i'm almost positive you're wrong.

i wasn't focused on 95, but i didn't notice anything about his d other than play on a few screens - which may or may not have been his fault.  i definitely trust my not noticing him more than board overreacters noticing that his man seemed to score a lot.

[wes mantooth]

that's not what i said.  what the tape, 95 got inside his player's jersey on defense, and then his guy drove right by him...everytime.

if i get bored sometime i may look at a replay, but even without doing so, i'm almost positive you're wrong.

i wasn't focused on 95, but i didn't notice anything about his d other than play on a few screens - which may or may not have been his fault.  i definitely trust my not noticing him more than board overreacters noticing that his man seemed to score a lot.

yeah we missed some switches on screens too, basically our jyc man defense sucked, all the more reason to try a zone

[kougar24]

Yes we should have made that adjustment at some point.  I don't buy the we would have gotten killed by the three talking point, we have no damn idea how well they would have shot.  CU had their way with dribble drive penetration all game, it was a clinic

Which is why a zone would have been worse.

[wes mantooth]

Yes we should have made that adjustment at some point.  I don't buy the we would have gotten killed by the three talking point, we have no damn idea how well they would have shot.  CU had their way with dribble drive penetration all game, it was a clinic

Which is why a zone would have been worse.

 

[kougar24]

Yes we should have made that adjustment at some point.  I don't buy the we would have gotten killed by the three talking point, we have no damn idea how well they would have shot.  CU had their way with dribble drive penetration all game, it was a clinic

Which is why a zone would have been worse.

 

You realize dribble penetration destroys a zone, don't you?

[wes mantooth]

Yes we should have made that adjustment at some point.  I don't buy the we would have gotten killed by the three talking point, we have no damn idea how well they would have shot.  CU had their way with dribble drive penetration all game, it was a clinic

Which is why a zone would have been worse.

 

You realize dribble penetration destroys a zone, don't you?

it's harder to dribble penetrate against a good zone.  we know how are man d was doing, why not give it a try?

[kougar24]

Yes we should have made that adjustment at some point.  I don't buy the we would have gotten killed by the three talking point, we have no damn idea how well they would have shot.  CU had their way with dribble drive penetration all game, it was a clinic

Which is why a zone would have been worse.

 

You realize dribble penetration destroys a zone, don't you?

it's harder to dribble penetrate against a good zone.  we know how are man d was doing, why not give it a try?

They would have gotten to the middle of our zone at will.

[jaa1025]

Maybe if effing 95 would have played more than 10 minutes combined all year he would have been better prepared than he was today. He got scorched on d when he was in and that's a fact. If he wasn't fouling he was getting bent over. Not just his on ball d was bad but his off ball when he'd foolishly lose his guy. Frank should have had him playing a lot more during the season being he's our most talented guard. Have fun in Miami frank.

[wes mantooth]

Yes we should have made that adjustment at some point.  I don't buy the we would have gotten killed by the three talking point, we have no damn idea how well they would have shot.  CU had their way with dribble drive penetration all game, it was a clinic

Which is why a zone would have been worse.

 

You realize dribble penetration destroys a zone, don't you?

it's harder to dribble penetrate against a good zone.  we know how are man d was doing, why not give it a try?

They would have gotten to the middle of our zone at will.

link?