Author Topic: this one is on you frank (Read 6468 times)

EllToPay · « **on:** March 10, 2011, 04:14:53 PM »

You gave in to the infatuation of a guard that can't shoot for crap, can't guard a lick and looks really neat driving to the basket. Nice.

TheMadCatter · « **Reply #1 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:15:42 PM »

Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:14:53 PM

You gave in to the infatuation of a guard that can't shoot for cac, can't guard a lick and looks really neat driving to the basket. Nice.

When he bulldozed the CU defender

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #2 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:18:28 PM »

Irving should have been in there in the 2nd half of Peterson. Can not believe Frank left him in there when he played like absolute cac

kougar24 · « **Reply #3 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:19:42 PM »

yeah, where the eff was Irving? annoying.

ednksu · « **Reply #4 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:20:52 PM »

and the best offensive weapon of the 3 is on the bench. At this point I won't blame Nick for leaving.

This game plan looked terrible. Copy of what we did at CU and it failed.

pike · « **Reply #5 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:22:58 PM »

Hate Frank right now. Hate him

KSU_foo · « **Reply #6 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:24:39 PM »

Why didn't we feed it to

EVERY time??? Freakin idiots!!!!!!!!

I seriously want to puke in Frank's face.

Poonhound69 · « **Reply #7 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:26:12 PM »

3-for-4 now in first round losses.

kingkongcat · « **Reply #8 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:27:33 PM »

It's called a 3-2 zone FRANK. Even if you don't use it much, it still gives the offense something else to think about.

1. They use mainly dribble drives.
2. No post up game.

Try it once in a while against these hippies.

kcchiefdav · « **Reply #9 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:30:24 PM »

There were alot of things that Frank should have tried. I would have liked to see JHR in there guarding the rim. JamSam did nothing helpful for the last 10 minutes of the game. How about a rough ridin' zone? When Higgins is shooting 90% from the lane, maybe the smart move is to let them shoot 3s, even if they're shooting 66% from there. It's pretty obvious that Frank hates the P66.

Jmo · « **Reply #10 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:32:50 PM »

rough ridin' horrible......95 must have eaten 50 rough ridin' pancakes b/f this game.....eff you frank

yoga-like_abana · « **Reply #11 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:33:55 PM »

franks totally lol'ing at all of you. its all apart of his plan, all apart of the plan.

sys · « **Reply #12 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:34:23 PM »

is bitching about Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) stuff a byproduct of being a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)? or, are you idiots trying?

EllToPay · « **Reply #13 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:34:50 PM »

Quote from: yoga-like_abana on March 10, 2011, 04:33:55 PM

franks totally lol'ing at all of you. its all apart of his plan, all apart of the plan.

if it's apart of the plan, it's not in the plan.

dumbass.

kingkongcat · « **Reply #14 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:36:00 PM »

Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:34:23 PM

is bitching about Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) stuff a byproduct of being a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)? or, are you idiots trying?

when something is that obvious its more of a statement than a bitching point

EllToPay · « **Reply #15 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:38:18 PM »

Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:34:23 PM

is bitching about Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) stuff a byproduct of being a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)? or, are you idiots trying?

is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?

yoga-like_abana · « **Reply #16 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:40:53 PM »

Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:34:50 PM

Quote from: yoga-like_abana on March 10, 2011, 04:33:55 PM
franks totally lol'ing at all of you. its all apart of his plan, all apart of the plan.

if it's apart of the plan, it's not in the plan.

dumbass.

you just dont see the big picture

KSU_foo · « **Reply #17 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:42:04 PM »

Quote from: yoga-like_abana on March 10, 2011, 04:40:53 PM

Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:34:50 PM
Quote from: yoga-like_abana on March 10, 2011, 04:33:55 PM
franks totally lol'ing at all of you. its all apart of his plan, all apart of the plan.

if it's apart of the plan, it's not in the plan.

dumbass.
you just dont see the big picture

He's correcting your use of "apart" It should have been "a part"

yoga-like_abana · « **Reply #18 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:45:02 PM »

merge w/ transparency thread

sys · « **Reply #19 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:47:43 PM »

Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:38:18 PM

is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?

it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.

EllToPay · « **Reply #20 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:48:59 PM »

Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:47:43 PM

Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:38:18 PM
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?

it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.

...and again...

sys · « **Reply #21 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:54:08 PM »

Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:48:59 PM

Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:47:43 PM
Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:38:18 PM
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?

it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.

...and again...

stop being obtuse. if there is a thread dedicated to saying peterson played poorly and was the reason kstate lost and i jump in to call thread participants retards, then it obvious that i do not think peterson played horribly and/or that his play was not particularly crucial to the outcome of the game. in fact it is obvious that i think such statements are so incorrect than only a "Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)" would entertain them.

kingkongcat · « **Reply #22 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:56:20 PM »

peterson didn't cost us the game. Poor pick n roll help from the bigs hurt us, as well as staying in the same failing defensive scheme the whole game.

We just didn't come close to outshooting them, which "might" have given us a chance.

KSU_foo · « **Reply #23 on:** March 10, 2011, 04:56:31 PM »

Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:54:08 PM

Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:48:59 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:47:43 PM
Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:38:18 PM
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?

it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.

...and again...

stop being obtuse. if there is a thread dedicated to saying peterson played poorly and was the reason kstate lost and i jump in to call thread participants retards, then it obvious that i do not think peterson played horribly and/or that his play was not particularly crucial to the outcome of the game. in fact it is obvious that i think such statements are so incorrect than only a "Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)" would entertain them.

I don't think sys watched the game.

EllToPay · « **Reply #24 on:** March 10, 2011, 05:03:46 PM »

Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:54:08 PM

Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:48:59 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:47:43 PM
Quote from: EllToPay on March 10, 2011, 04:38:18 PM
is this generally your comment when you just want to go against the grain when you don't have anything to further your point?

it's my default comment for when retards pick out some insignificant detail and bitch about it as if it mattered.

...and again...

stop being obtuse. if there is a thread dedicated to saying peterson played poorly and was the reason kstate lost and i jump in to call thread participants retards, then it obvious that i do not think peterson played horribly and/or that his play was not particularly crucial to the outcome of the game. in fact it is obvious that i think such statements are so incorrect than only a "Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)" would entertain them.

check the thread title again, then get back with me.