« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down

Author Topic: CU later  (Read 24764 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #75 on: March 10, 2011, 04:19:38 PM »
We're so lucky there' no buff who visit this board.
Logged

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #76 on: March 10, 2011, 04:19:53 PM »
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

we wouldn't have lost to isu, so that means nothing
Logged

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #77 on: March 10, 2011, 04:20:08 PM »
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:19:53 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

we wouldn't have lost to isu, so that means nothing

yes we would have.
Logged

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #78 on: March 10, 2011, 04:21:01 PM »
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:20:08 PM
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:19:53 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

we wouldn't have lost to isu, so that means nothing

yes we would have.

I'm depressed as crap too right now, but let's be realistic.
Logged

Offline Havs

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 3285
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: CU later
« Reply #79 on: March 10, 2011, 04:22:02 PM »
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:21:01 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:20:08 PM
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:19:53 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

we wouldn't have lost to isu, so that means nothing

yes we would have.

I'm depressed as crap too right now, but let's be realistic.

We choked a lead to CU... you guys flat out LOST.
Logged

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #80 on: March 10, 2011, 04:22:31 PM »
Quote from: Haverhill on March 10, 2011, 04:22:02 PM
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:21:01 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:20:08 PM
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:19:53 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

we wouldn't have lost to isu, so that means nothing

yes we would have.

I'm depressed as crap too right now, but let's be realistic.

We choked a lead to CU... you guys flat out LOST.

ksu lead too?
Logged
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #81 on: March 10, 2011, 04:23:13 PM »
Why are ISU fans over here talking crap? JFC, do you guys realize how bad you were this year?
Logged

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #82 on: March 10, 2011, 04:23:52 PM »
Quote from: Haverhill on March 10, 2011, 04:22:02 PM
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:21:01 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:20:08 PM
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:19:53 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

we wouldn't have lost to isu, so that means nothing

yes we would have.

I'm depressed as crap too right now, but let's be realistic.

We choked a lead to CU... you guys flat out LOST.

my god, is being an isu fan that bad? this is what you have to resort to for smack talk?
Logged

Offline Please

  • Point Plank'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 112
  • President of the Greater Houston Duke Fan Club
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #83 on: March 10, 2011, 04:24:03 PM »
CU LATER indeed.
Logged

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #84 on: March 10, 2011, 04:24:22 PM »
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:19:53 PM
we wouldn't have lost to isu, so that means nothing

fortunately, we'll never know.  thanks to intelligent rooting by most fans yesterday.
Logged
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #85 on: March 10, 2011, 04:25:42 PM »
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

If you're indicating that we would have lost to isu, then you either understand that this team sucks and is reverting back to it's old/true self or are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  please choose.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2011, 04:30:05 PM by catzacker »
Logged

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #86 on: March 10, 2011, 04:26:25 PM »
Quote from: EMAWzified on March 10, 2011, 04:19:38 PM
We're so lucky there' no buff who visit this board.

They are hitting the slopes.
Logged
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline Havs

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 3285
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: CU later
« Reply #87 on: March 10, 2011, 04:26:40 PM »
Gotta keep cheering for teams we beat this year.
Logged

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #88 on: March 10, 2011, 04:29:35 PM »
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:20:08 PM
Quote from: AbeFroman on March 10, 2011, 04:19:53 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

we wouldn't have lost to isu, so that means nothing

yes we would have.

We would have beaten ISU. It's very easy to beat a team you've already beaten twice a third time. The stats support it.
Logged

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #89 on: March 10, 2011, 04:31:03 PM »
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:25:42 PM
If you're indicating that we would have lost to cu, then you either understand that this team sucks and is reverting back to it's old/true self or are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  please choose.

i assume you meant isu.  if so, you outline a false dichotomy.  i can't believe you'd need someone to explain to you that a team that already lost nine games could lose a tenth.
Logged
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #90 on: March 10, 2011, 04:36:19 PM »
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:25:42 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

If you're indicating that we would have lost to isu, then you either understand that this team sucks and is reverting back to it's old/true self or are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  please choose.

simply regression to the mean. we'd played too well for too long. we were due, especially after four days off.
Logged

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #91 on: March 10, 2011, 04:38:52 PM »
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:31:03 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:25:42 PM
If you're indicating that we would have lost to cu, then you either understand that this team sucks and is reverting back to it's old/true self or are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  please choose.

i assume you meant isu.  if so, you outline a false dichotomy.  i can't believe you'd need someone to explain to you that a team that already lost nine games could lose a tenth.

i can't believe that losing to isu has the same probability of losing to cu.  it's not a coin flip.
Logged

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #92 on: March 10, 2011, 04:39:03 PM »
I was wrong. Way wrong.
Logged

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #93 on: March 10, 2011, 04:39:34 PM »
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:36:19 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:25:42 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

If you're indicating that we would have lost to isu, then you either understand that this team sucks and is reverting back to it's old/true self or are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  please choose.

simply regression to the mean. we'd played too well for too long. we were due, especially after four days off.

our mean is a below average team.
Logged

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #94 on: March 10, 2011, 04:41:12 PM »
we got 16 f'ing more shots than them.  our defense was december/january-esque. 
Logged

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #95 on: March 10, 2011, 04:42:10 PM »
Quote from: ksu_FAN on March 10, 2011, 04:39:03 PM
I was wrong. Way wrong.

I hate to bring out the "this team is a bad matchup for us" card when that's used pretty often by KU and MU fans for anytime they lose, but in this case, I think it's applicable. This team cannot handle guarding three really good shooters, especially if two of them are really athletic and can slice to the hole. Boyle's offense does a perfect job of spreading out the dobermanKATZ and isolating them to expose their weaknesses.
Logged

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #96 on: March 10, 2011, 04:42:34 PM »
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:39:34 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:36:19 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:25:42 PM
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

If you're indicating that we would have lost to isu, then you either understand that this team sucks and is reverting back to it's old/true self or are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  please choose.

simply regression to the mean. we'd played too well for too long. we were due, especially after four days off.

our mean is a below average team.

not below. just average.
Logged

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #97 on: March 10, 2011, 04:43:28 PM »
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:38:52 PM
i can't believe that losing to isu has the same probability of losing to cu.  it's not a coin flip.

it doesn't, of course.  but it wouldn't have been anywhere near zero.  and not all that different.  cu's kenpom was .8285 (60th), isu's was .7531 (76th).  two teams far more similar in quality than in perception, so the risk/reward selection was obvious.

it's just a shame we couldn't have played a&m or mu instead of either of them.
Logged
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #98 on: March 10, 2011, 04:45:47 PM »
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:42:34 PM
not below. just average.

significantly better than average, actually.  probably somewhere around 20-35th best out of 345 or so.
Logged
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #99 on: March 10, 2011, 04:53:11 PM »
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:45:47 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:42:34 PM
not below. just average.

significantly better than average, actually.  probably somewhere around 20-35th best out of 345 or so.

against the "field", 35 is under average.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
« previous next »