« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: CU later  (Read 24825 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #50 on: March 10, 2011, 09:47:32 AM »
Quote from: bradleigh on March 10, 2011, 09:37:50 AM
Quote from: Emo EMAW on March 10, 2011, 09:25:03 AM
Did you just call K-State '09-'10 a "complete crap team?"   :facepalm:

there are exceptions to every rule, Emo EMAW.

Most of those Iowa State teams were tournament teams, and the Texas Tech teams in the Bob Knight era were pretty damned good. Not to mention 07-08 OU. But yeah, elite teams don't get swept in the regular season very often. Who would have thought that?
Logged

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #51 on: March 10, 2011, 09:48:27 AM »
Only wanted to add the cliche type stuff "Don't let the door hit your a$$ on the way out", etc.  'Cats are fresh, playing well, and focused.  Agree with the prediction they win by 12.  Would be awesome if the Buffs are not invited.
Logged

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38080
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #52 on: March 10, 2011, 09:56:18 AM »
Logged

Offline bradleigh

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 416
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #53 on: March 10, 2011, 09:57:58 AM »
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on March 10, 2011, 09:47:32 AM
Quote from: bradleigh on March 10, 2011, 09:37:50 AM
Quote from: Emo EMAW on March 10, 2011, 09:25:03 AM
Did you just call K-State '09-'10 a "complete crap team?"   :facepalm:

there are exceptions to every rule, Emo EMAW.

Most of those Iowa State teams were tournament teams, and the Texas Tech teams in the Bob Knight era were pretty damned good. Not to mention 07-08 OU. But yeah, elite teams don't get swept in the regular season very often. Who would have thought that?

Iowa state, nebraska, texas tech.  First thing I did when I printed that list out was cross all of their names off of it.
Logged
2/8/11 - Never Forget

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #54 on: March 10, 2011, 10:03:40 AM »
Quote from: bradleigh on March 10, 2011, 09:57:58 AM
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on March 10, 2011, 09:47:32 AM
Quote from: bradleigh on March 10, 2011, 09:37:50 AM
Quote from: Emo EMAW on March 10, 2011, 09:25:03 AM
Did you just call K-State '09-'10 a "complete crap team?"   :facepalm:

there are exceptions to every rule, Emo EMAW.

Most of those Iowa State teams were tournament teams, and the Texas Tech teams in the Bob Knight era were pretty damned good. Not to mention 07-08 OU. But yeah, elite teams don't get swept in the regular season very often. Who would have thought that?

Iowa state, nebraska, texas tech.  First thing I did when I printed that list out was cross all of their names off of it.

K-State is 0-3 against teams that have already beaten them twice. :ohno:

Seriously, though, Iowa State was pretty much always a tournament team in the Floyd/Eustachy eras, and Tech also was a tournament team throughout the Bob Knight era. Nebraska is the only team that you can just assume is always shitty.
Logged

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #55 on: March 10, 2011, 11:01:55 AM »
Quote from: Emo EMAW on March 10, 2011, 08:28:15 AM
Guys, this team barely beat Iowa State yesterday.

We struggled to beat ISU less than a week ago, in the OOD.
Logged

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #56 on: March 10, 2011, 11:07:31 AM »
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 11:01:55 AM
Quote from: Emo EMAW on March 10, 2011, 08:28:15 AM
Guys, this team barely beat Iowa State yesterday.

We struggled to beat ISU less than a week ago, in the OOD.

Whatevs, we didn't show up.  We'll show up today.
Logged

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2011
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #57 on: March 10, 2011, 11:12:43 AM »
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 11:01:55 AM
Quote from: Emo EMAW on March 10, 2011, 08:28:15 AM
Guys, this team barely beat Iowa State yesterday.

We struggled to beat ISU less than a week ago, in the OOD.

meh.  Never dipped below 70% win probability.
Logged

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #58 on: March 10, 2011, 11:35:21 AM »
Quote from: SleepFighter on March 10, 2011, 11:12:43 AM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 11:01:55 AM
Quote from: Emo EMAW on March 10, 2011, 08:28:15 AM
Guys, this team barely beat Iowa State yesterday.

We struggled to beat ISU less than a week ago, in the OOD.

meh.  Never dipped below 70% win probability.

Our lead was only 1.2% "safe" with 3:13 to go.
Logged

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20631
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #59 on: March 10, 2011, 11:48:14 AM »
Law of averages comes back to bite us in the ass
Logged

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #60 on: March 10, 2011, 11:51:47 AM »
Lots of haters in this thread.
Logged
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2011
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #61 on: March 10, 2011, 02:07:44 PM »
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 11:35:21 AM
Quote from: SleepFighter on March 10, 2011, 11:12:43 AM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 11:01:55 AM
Quote from: Emo EMAW on March 10, 2011, 08:28:15 AM
Guys, this team barely beat Iowa State yesterday.

We struggled to beat ISU less than a week ago, in the OOD.

meh.  Never dipped below 70% win probability.

Our lead was only 1.2% "safe" with 3:13 to go.

http://kenpom.com/winprob.php?g=5080
Logged

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #62 on: March 10, 2011, 02:50:18 PM »
idiots
Logged

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #63 on: March 10, 2011, 03:53:28 PM »
yeah, let's play CU.   
Logged

Offline bigwillie20

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2772
  • #FYJC #burnitdown
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #64 on: March 10, 2011, 03:55:46 PM »
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 03:53:28 PM
yeah, let's play CU.   

Jake is 5-16....and eff u
Logged

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #65 on: March 10, 2011, 03:57:07 PM »
Quote from: bigwillie20 on March 10, 2011, 03:55:46 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 03:53:28 PM
yeah, let's play CU.   

Jake is 5-16....and eff u

cause jake's reverting back to the old jake.  with cu, it's come full circle.
Logged

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #66 on: March 10, 2011, 03:59:51 PM »
reminiscent under 4 minute meltdown.  just like old times.
Logged

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #67 on: March 10, 2011, 04:00:49 PM »
grats zacker.
Logged
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #68 on: March 10, 2011, 04:01:31 PM »
Logged

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13505
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #69 on: March 10, 2011, 04:03:54 PM »
Quote from: MakeItRain on March 09, 2011, 11:47:46 PM
I'll donate a nut if CU scores 73 points.
Will you give Trim your donated nut?
Logged

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CU later
« Reply #70 on: March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM »
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.
Logged

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #71 on: March 10, 2011, 04:13:47 PM »
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

seriously, i said this yesterday. Really looking forward to tomorrow  :facepalm:
Logged

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #72 on: March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM »
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.
Logged
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline CloneBroChill

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #73 on: March 10, 2011, 04:18:12 PM »
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.
Looks like Colorado just said "C-U later" to KSU.... :thumbsup:
Logged

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #74 on: March 10, 2011, 04:18:58 PM »
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:11:41 PM
all of you are f'ing morons for wanting to face CU.  f 'ing morons.

this is much better than losing to isu.  lol @ you for never understanding that.

this.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »