Author Topic: CU later  (Read 24742 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
CU later
« on: March 09, 2011, 05:09:44 PM »
The team I most wanted to play in the first round of the Big 12 tournament, and the game is finally here. CU has two very good players and Boyle has done a nice job, but given how K-State has played throughout February, this is simply a game we should win. Looking at the numbers, there really is no area where I can give CU an advantage, though K-State isn't really dominant in any category either.



When you look at the 2 games this year, I agree with what Underwood said on 810, you pretty much can throw out the only loss in the OOD of the season. This is simply a much different team, and I do not expect to see a performance that resembles that game.



However, in the 2nd game we outplayed CU in many phases but we had Pullen's worst offensive game in Big 12 play. Its no surprise it was also the team's worst shooting night and 2nd worst offensive efficiency game of the Big 12 season. Only CU's advantage in eFG% allowed them to win that game, and even then, only by a finger tip in Boulder.

I expect the Cats to win this game, likely pulling away late. CU's talent will keep them in it, but after a hard fought win today, I don't think they can compete with K-State for 40 minutes if we play like we have lately. CU just doesn't play good enough defense and we have too big of an advantage on the boards to let this one get away. Plus I'm not expecting a repeat of the shooting we saw in the first two CU games, 2 of our 3 worst shooting nights in Big 12 play.

Cats 82 - Buffs 73


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2011, 05:13:31 PM »
 :emawkid:

fear the beard. geaux q@z

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: CU later
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2011, 05:14:48 PM »
I expect the Cats to win this game, likely pulling away late. CU's talent will keep them in it, but after a hard fought win today, I don't think they can compete with K-State for 40 minutes if we play like we have lately. CU just doesn't play good enough defense and we have too big of an advantage on the boards to let this one get away. Plus I'm not expecting a repeat of the shooting we saw in the first two CU games, 2 of our 3 worst shooting nights in Big 12 play.

That and we're completely fresh while Higgins and Burks both played 35+ minutes.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32513
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2011, 05:15:11 PM »
ANGER LEVELS AT AN ALL TIME HIGH :curse:     Going to be very satisfying to crush them.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2011, 05:19:41 PM »
I expect the Cats to win this game, likely pulling away late. CU's talent will keep them in it, but after a hard fought win today, I don't think they can compete with K-State for 40 minutes if we play like we have lately. CU just doesn't play good enough defense and we have too big of an advantage on the boards to let this one get away. Plus I'm not expecting a repeat of the shooting we saw in the first two CU games, 2 of our 3 worst shooting nights in Big 12 play.

That and we're completely fresh while Higgins and Burks both played 35+ minutes.

Limiting Higgins and Burks will be big, but Knutson killed us just as much as those two.

8-11 from 3 in our 2 games and scored 36 total points.

Burks scored 20 total. Higgins scored 26 total.

Offline samwise

  • Point Plank'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2011, 05:56:06 PM »
It's pretty damn hard to beat a team 3 times in one season. Cats by 12.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2011, 05:56:16 PM »
gotta freeze out knutson like they did christo in the last isu game.  christo is harder to guard, and they completely shut him out, so it shouldn't be a problem.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2011, 05:56:57 PM »
It's pretty damn hard to beat a team 3 times in one season.

not if you've already won the first two.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13505
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2011, 05:57:44 PM »
Bet they come out and want it more.

Offline KSUTOMMY

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1575
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2011, 05:58:48 PM »
No way we lose this one, no way.

pheer the beer'd. geaux q@z
We are K-State and we love to hire SHlTTY coaches.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17051
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2011, 06:12:56 PM »
Hope it goes a lot like this beginning of this video.



If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2011, 06:49:04 PM »
Let's look at the numbers:  CU 2, KSU 0.  Bad match up for us.

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2011, 06:57:45 PM »
Absolutely hate playing teams with three guys that can shoot it, two of which can drive it like all-americans.
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #13 on: March 09, 2011, 07:07:33 PM »
nice title _FAN.

:cheers:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2011, 10:00:16 PM »
Hope it goes a lot like this beginning of this video.






 :bawl:

Last year's team was so much fun

Offline CloneBroChill

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2011, 11:08:56 PM »
Is that what you said after the first 2 times that you beat Colorado this year...oh wait... :bait:
« Last Edit: March 09, 2011, 11:15:41 PM by CloneBroChill »

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2011, 11:14:45 PM »
Is that what you said after the first 2 time that you beat Colorado this year...oh wait... :bait:

is this real life
emaw

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #17 on: March 09, 2011, 11:17:10 PM »
Is that what you said after the first 2 times that you beat Colorado this year...oh wait... :bait:

bro, chill

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53906
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #18 on: March 09, 2011, 11:17:29 PM »
Is that what you said after the first 2 times that you beat Colorado this year...oh wait... :bait:

ask the lady clones

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #19 on: March 09, 2011, 11:17:51 PM »
goddamnit havs.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline CloneBroChill

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 193
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #20 on: March 09, 2011, 11:20:19 PM »
goddamnit havs.
The fact that i'm being associated with that person...due to the same fanbase...is embarrassing...its like trying to distance yourself from Jim Woolridge.... :facepalm:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2011, 11:22:07 PM »
It's pretty damn hard to beat a team 3 times in one season. Cats by 12.

I would be willing to bet everything I own that if you look at every 3rd matchup between basketball teams in the same season in the last 20 years that where one team has won the first 2 games, that team will also win the 3rd game more than 50% of the time. I wouldn't be surprised at all if the team won the 3rd game more than 70% of the time. In reality, it's hard to beat a team that has already beaten you twice.

Cats win 72-60.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #22 on: March 09, 2011, 11:22:53 PM »
goddamnit havs.
The fact that i'm being associated with that person...due to the same fanbase...is embarrassing...its like trying to distance yourself from Jim Woolridge.... :facepalm:

all iowans are exactly the same person

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: CU later
« Reply #23 on: March 09, 2011, 11:23:30 PM »
goddamnit havs.
The fact that i'm being associated with that person...due to the same fanbase...is embarrassing...its like trying to distance yourself from Jim Woolridge.... :facepalm:

Yes, because you've certainly taken us by storm with your wit and charisma.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53906
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #24 on: March 09, 2011, 11:25:13 PM »
goddamnit havs.
The fact that i'm being associated with that person...due to the same fanbase...is embarrassing...its like trying to distance yourself from Jim Woolridge.... :facepalm:

all iowans are exactly the same person

Same brain.