Author Topic: let's go Havs  (Read 10951 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20631
    • View Profile
let's go Havs
« on: March 09, 2011, 02:14:37 PM »
 :cheers:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2011, 02:27:50 PM »
you can't stop jamie vanderbeken, you can only hope to contain him.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32514
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2011, 02:40:01 PM »
Here is to a triple OT victory for the buffs  :cheers:
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline SoonerHoopsfan

  • Land Grab'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 233
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2011, 02:43:40 PM »
The Iowa St vs Oklahoma Big 12 final will be epic, it will be just like a small conference tournament in impact.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2011, 02:48:36 PM »
I hope CU wins by 60

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2011, 02:54:16 PM »
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2011, 03:26:12 PM »
 :popcorn:

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2011, 03:27:01 PM »
Do not want ISU, they will beat us

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53907
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2011, 03:29:18 PM »
Do not want ISU, they will beat us

No.  Isu rough ridin' sucks.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2011, 03:34:53 PM »
I want to play CU.

Offline bigwillie20

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2772
  • #FYJC #burnitdown
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2011, 03:36:32 PM »

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2011, 03:37:34 PM »
Overtime very likely in this game.   :pray:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2011, 03:38:19 PM »
I want to play CU.

everyone does.  playing ISU is pointless.

Offline doom

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3622
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #13 on: March 09, 2011, 03:48:02 PM »
Kind of funny to watch garrett dunk on some bitches. 
“They said something along the lines of ‘it kind of sounds like you’d be interested in it.’ And I said ‘hell yeah I am. Why not?’” -Doug Gottlieb

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2011, 03:49:15 PM »
is everyone else thinking that cu is taking a dive to avoid the skullfucking, too?  i think we underestimated how far they'd go to preserve their sweep.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline bigwillie20

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2772
  • #FYJC #burnitdown
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2011, 03:51:28 PM »
JFC, i don't want to play those iowa bitches again.   :chainsaw: c'mon buffs  :curse:

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16962
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2011, 03:53:49 PM »
most adorable thing about isu is the group of student managers or whatever at the end of the bench that are SO INTO THE GAME.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #17 on: March 09, 2011, 03:54:50 PM »
is everyone else thinking that cu is taking a dive to avoid the skulleffing, too?  i think we underestimated how far they'd go to preserve their sweep.

I don't know why everyone's so excited to play the team with the lottery pick and nba second rounder that's abused us twice already. rather than the team with garrett.

Offline SwiftCat

  • #LIFE
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3618
  • Depth Charge
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #18 on: March 09, 2011, 03:55:43 PM »
Its been posted more than a few times. Its because we want to skullfuck them.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2011, 03:58:00 PM by SwiftCat »

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #19 on: March 09, 2011, 03:57:03 PM »
is everyone else thinking that cu is taking a dive to avoid the skulleffing, too?  i think we underestimated how far they'd go to preserve their sweep.

I don't know why everyone's so excited to play the team with the lottery pick and nba second rounder that's abused us twice already. rather than the team with garrett.

If we can't beat Colorado tomorrow, then we have no business winning a game in the NCAA's. 

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #20 on: March 09, 2011, 04:02:10 PM »
is everyone else thinking that cu is taking a dive to avoid the skulleffing, too?  i think we underestimated how far they'd go to preserve their sweep.

I don't know why everyone's so excited to play the team with the lottery pick and nba second rounder that's abused us twice already. rather than the team with garrett.

If we can't beat Colorado tomorrow, then we have no business winning a game in the NCAA's. 

that's a weird opinion/hyperbole/criterion given that we've lost to them twice already.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #21 on: March 09, 2011, 04:04:04 PM »
that's a weird opinion/hyperbole/criterion given that we've lost to them twice already.

try not to be such a messageboarding fp, tc, etc.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline bigwillie20

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2772
  • #FYJC #burnitdown
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #22 on: March 09, 2011, 04:04:08 PM »
We played like crap both times against Iowa St., rather not watch that again.  I want to drill CU by about 35  :curse:

Offline raquetcat

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
  • ^ I let us down
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #23 on: March 09, 2011, 04:04:09 PM »

is everyone else thinking that cu is taking a dive to avoid the skulleffing, too?  i think we underestimated how far they'd go to preserve their sweep.

I don't know why everyone's so excited to play the team with the lottery pick and nba second rounder that's abused us twice already. rather than the team with garrett.

If we can't beat Colorado tomorrow, then we have no business winning a game in the NCAA's.  


Do not agree
I'm purple down

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: let's go Havs
« Reply #24 on: March 09, 2011, 04:07:26 PM »
is everyone else thinking that cu is taking a dive to avoid the skulleffing, too?  i think we underestimated how far they'd go to preserve their sweep.

I don't know why everyone's so excited to play the team with the lottery pick and nba second rounder that's abused us twice already. rather than the team with garrett.

If we can't beat Colorado tomorrow, then we have no business winning a game in the NCAA's. 

that's a weird opinion/hyperbole/criterion given that we've lost to them twice already.

Old offense on the first.  I'm confident we'd be favored to win if we played them tomorrow.