Author Topic: The Official Bracketology Thread  (Read 367160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1125 on: March 16, 2014, 04:52:52 PM »
Michigan went 17-4 in all its game in the Big 10 (counting tourney).   Virginia went 19-2 in all games vs ACC.
Mich's conf SOS was ranked 7th hardest coming into today.  Virg was 87th

Mich had 7 wins over Big 10 teams in top 50 who are in tourney. Beat rpi 54 iowa who is in tourney. Beat rpi 50 Minn twice (I think Minn is out)
Virg had 5 wins over top 50 team in ACC who are in the tourney

Mich lost 4 games in non con. best win is Stanford rpi 42
Virg lost 4 games in non con. Best win is SMU rpi 55

Michigan > Virginia ...  when speaking of who should get the last 1 seed
Lunardi now has Virg as the last 1 seed

Online BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1402
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1126 on: March 16, 2014, 04:53:05 PM »
Cole Manbeck ?@Cole_Manbeck  2m
Lunardi's bracket is jumping all over the place despite no games today impacting some of these moves. K-State now a 10 seed in Buffalo

crap.  I would bet that we would be one of the first games to play on Thursday.  Screw that.
Why?

I like late afternoon or evening games.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13551
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1127 on: March 16, 2014, 04:53:11 PM »
florida has seniors guys.  they're unstoppable.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13551
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1128 on: March 16, 2014, 04:54:35 PM »
Michigan went 17-4 in all its game in the Big 10 (counting tourney).   Virginia went 19-2 in all games vs ACC.
Mich's conf SOS was ranked 7th hardest coming into today.  Virg was 87th

Mich had 7 wins over Big 10 teams in top 50 who are in tourney. Beat rpi 54 iowa who is in tourney. Beat rpi 50 Minn twice (I think Minn is out)
Virg had 5 wins over top 50 team in ACC who are in the tourney

Mich lost 4 games in non con. best win is Stanford rpi 42
Virg lost 4 games in non con. Best win is SMU rpi 55

Michigan > Virginia ...  when speaking of who should get the last 1 seed
Lunardi now has Virg as the last 1 seed

which team has more seniors?

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1129 on: March 16, 2014, 04:56:42 PM »
Cole Manbeck ?@Cole_Manbeck  2m
Lunardi's bracket is jumping all over the place despite no games today impacting some of these moves. K-State now a 10 seed in Buffalo

crap.  I would bet that we would be one of the first games to play on Thursday.  Screw that.
Why?

I like late afternoon or evening games.

Morning gives you an excuse to start drinking and then if/when we win, you get to party all afternoon and watch other teams.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63770
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1130 on: March 16, 2014, 04:59:35 PM »
morning games are the rough ridin' worst
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7552
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1131 on: March 16, 2014, 04:59:44 PM »
Morning works best if you are rooting for a good team, I don't think that is the case this year

Online BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1402
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1132 on: March 16, 2014, 05:00:32 PM »
Cole Manbeck ?@Cole_Manbeck  2m
Lunardi's bracket is jumping all over the place despite no games today impacting some of these moves. K-State now a 10 seed in Buffalo

crap.  I would bet that we would be one of the first games to play on Thursday.  Screw that.
Why?

I like late afternoon or evening games.

Morning gives you an excuse to start drinking and then if/when we win, you get to party all afternoon and watch other teams.

If we lose the whole day is ruined.

Offline SPE_khat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 389
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1133 on: March 16, 2014, 05:02:13 PM »
HERE WE GO

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30240
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1134 on: March 16, 2014, 05:03:08 PM »
Colorado got an 8 seed hmmmmmm
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13551
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1135 on: March 16, 2014, 05:03:17 PM »
eff.  we won't play florida

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1136 on: March 16, 2014, 05:05:18 PM »
Underwood v. Manning?

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13551
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1137 on: March 16, 2014, 05:05:36 PM »
lol@ isu fans who thought they were going to get the 2 in st louis over ku

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63770
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1138 on: March 16, 2014, 05:07:00 PM »
doug is just a treat on this show
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30240
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1139 on: March 16, 2014, 05:07:53 PM »
Remember when they used to care about us :frown:
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63770
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1140 on: March 16, 2014, 05:08:49 PM »
Underwood v. Manning?

i will be rooting hard for this
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1402
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1141 on: March 16, 2014, 05:09:43 PM »
Remember when they used to care about us :frown:

Was just thinking about that.  Live look ins.....pfft... Not any more.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44808
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1142 on: March 16, 2014, 05:10:11 PM »
lol@ isu fans who thought they were going to get the 2 in st louis over ku

seriously? :ROFL:

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16725
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1143 on: March 16, 2014, 05:10:51 PM »
that jay wright commercial :love:

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44808
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1144 on: March 16, 2014, 05:13:38 PM »
osu will brutalize Gonzaga as will OU to NDSU

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44808
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1145 on: March 16, 2014, 05:16:55 PM »
That San Antonio pod is rough ridin' amazing, we seem like a lock for StL with WSU now

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63770
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1146 on: March 16, 2014, 05:17:14 PM »
ou a 5?  baylor a 6? weird
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17542
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1147 on: March 16, 2014, 05:19:14 PM »
ou a 5?  baylor a 6? weird

Makes me think we could even get a 7 but prob a 8

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44808
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1148 on: March 16, 2014, 05:19:34 PM »
ou a 5?  baylor a 6? weird

why weird?

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1149 on: March 16, 2014, 05:19:41 PM »
I'VE GOT TO ROOT FOR BAYLOR TO KEEP NUBB'S STREAK ALIVE. eff EVERYTHING RIGHT NOW.