Author Topic: The Official Bracketology Thread  (Read 378334 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Trogdor

  • Hoodcat
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2985
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #725 on: March 02, 2014, 11:03:57 AM »
Palm has us as a #9 (on the bubble  :dubious:) vs. Pitt in STL.  Wichita st. as the 1

would take compared to a 7 in a bracket with 'cuse 'consin 'ke or 'ginia

Yeah but if we end up playing WSU, itll be bleeding Kansas up in here

good.

Some people want to watch the world burn. scott is some people
@Trogdor_gE

Offline Boondock Poonhound

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 434
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #726 on: March 02, 2014, 11:11:27 AM »
Eight top 25 teams lost Saturday. And that is not counting two games where both teams playing were ranked in the top 25.
If we lose @ OSU, beat Baylor, and win one B12 game, we will be a 7 seed or better.
"He's in Shape !"

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #727 on: March 02, 2014, 03:23:00 PM »
Joe Lunardi ?@ESPNLunardi · 3h
28-Vcu; 29-Smu, 30-Mem, 31-AzSt, 32-KSt; 33-Zaga, 34-Gw, 35-Pitt, 36-Stan; 37-Xav, 38-Col, 39-StJoe, 40-Cal; 41-Byu, 42-Bay, 43-OkSt, 44-Ark

I think we should be ahead of those four teams right in front of us.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #728 on: March 02, 2014, 04:10:08 PM »
Joe Lunardi ?@ESPNLunardi · 3h
28-Vcu; 29-Smu, 30-Mem, 31-AzSt, 32-KSt; 33-Zaga, 34-Gw, 35-Pitt, 36-Stan; 37-Xav, 38-Col, 39-StJoe, 40-Cal; 41-Byu, 42-Bay, 43-OkSt, 44-Ark

I think we should be ahead of those four teams right in front of us.

Yeah, Im surprised he has us as the last 8 seed.  Its not in the above tweet but he had Iowa as 24 (or worst 6 seed).   I don't get the love for Iowa

* Ksu 10-6 in Big 12. Iowa 9-7 in Big 10.  Both teams 20-9 overall
* Ksu 5-5 vs top 50 rpi teams in Big 12.  Iowa 3-6 vs top 50 teams in Big 10
* Ksu RPI/SOS was 37 and 42.  Iowa is at 45 and 56...... And our non con SOS is 149 while theirs is 247
* Ksu in non con beat Gonz and GW (top 30 wins) and had 1 bad loss, Charlotte (No Col loss wont really hurt cause no Gip).
   Iowa in non con beat Xavier (top 50 win), no bad losses, no other top 100 wins.
* Ksu has 9 top 100 wins while Iowa only has 6.   Kstate only is 2-6 on road while Iowa is 4-5 (both have 3 wins on neutral court)


Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #729 on: March 02, 2014, 04:34:21 PM »
Joe Lunardi ?@ESPNLunardi · 3h
28-Vcu; 29-Smu, 30-Mem, 31-AzSt, 32-KSt; 33-Zaga, 34-Gw, 35-Pitt, 36-Stan; 37-Xav, 38-Col, 39-StJoe, 40-Cal; 41-Byu, 42-Bay, 43-OkSt, 44-Ark

I think we should be ahead of those four teams right in front of us.

Beat OSU and Baylor and we will be.  Pretty simple. 

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29245
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #730 on: March 02, 2014, 06:26:53 PM »
Being an 8 or 9 is almost not worth even going.  Maybe we should just save the money and not fly everyone to the game.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20491
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #731 on: March 02, 2014, 06:52:38 PM »
I really hope if we aren't a 6 or 7 that they drop us to a 10 to screw over a weak 7 and then we hope for the best on the 2 line.

Something like:

Iowa 7
Kansas St. 10

Michigan/Creighton/Wichita St 2

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #732 on: March 02, 2014, 07:06:40 PM »
I really hope if we aren't a 6 or 7 that they drop us to a 10 to screw over a weak 7 and then we hope for the best on the 2 line.

Something like:

Iowa 7
Kansas St. 10

Michigan/Creighton/Wichita St 2

would love that.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #733 on: March 02, 2014, 08:17:21 PM »
I want a 7 and I don't think we're far away.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #734 on: March 02, 2014, 09:00:47 PM »
I really don't think ohio st deserves a 6 seed, but I don't believe Kstate or any of the 7 seeds really deserve it either.   Glad the Buckeyes (0-2) and Hawkeyes (1-2) had a bad week.    We are 10-6 in the #1 rated conference and half of those 10 wins are vs top 50.  No way we should be in the 8 vs 9 game right now


Team/Seed    Record (Conf)   RPI     SOS    1-25    26-50      Other stat/comment
______________________________________________________________________________________________
6 Texas           21-8(10-6)      25       33      3-5      4-3         Tcu and at Tech left
6 Kentucky      21-8(11-5)      17        6       0-3      3-1         Only 3 top 50 wins, but 13 vs top 100
6 UConn          23-6(11-5)      26       65      2-1      2-4         Beat Fla, Cincy, Swept memphis
6 Ohio St         22-8(9-8)        19       16      1-2      3-2         Good road wins at Wisc/Iowa. No great win in non con

7 KState           20-9(10-6)      37       42      4-4     3-1         7 top 50 wins, road record is biggest con
7 N Mexico       23-5(14-2)      20       39       2-2     0-0         SDSU, Cincy good wins.  Only 5 of 23 wins vs top 100
7 UMass           22-6(9-5)        13       50      2-0      3-2         Won only meeting with VCU, GW. Beat N Mex
7 VCU              22-7(10-4)      15       36      2-2      2-2         Beat SLU on Sat.  Also have win at Virg. Split with GW

8 Iowa             20-9(9-7)        45       56      2-7       2-1         Beat Mich, OhioSt.   Last 4 games - 3 losses, barely beat lowly purdue
8 Memphis       21-7(11-5)       33       66      0-2      4-4         Only 5 wins vs top 140.  Last week, Good win (Lvile) and Bad loss to Houston(rpi 147)
8 Ariz St           21-8(10-6)      29       44      1-3       3-2         Good win over AZ.  Won 8 of last 11 conf games
8 G Wash          21-7(9-5)        28      74       2-3      0-2          Wins over Creighton, split with VCU


The 1 seeds --  Arizona  Florida  Wich St  Syracuse
The 2 seeds --  Wiscy     KU       Duke      Virginia
The 3 seeds --  Mich      Nova    Creighton  SD St
The 4 seeds --  Iowa St  Mich St  UNC      Cincy
The 5 seeds --  SLU       Ucla      OU         Lville

 

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #735 on: March 02, 2014, 09:10:15 PM »
I would love to talk to a northern Colorado/Charlotte fan right now. They must be like "wtf happened to you guys?"

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #736 on: March 02, 2014, 09:25:17 PM »
we are going to get a 6 yo.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #737 on: March 02, 2014, 09:37:00 PM »
we are going to get a 6 yo.

If we get 2 more wins, then yes.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #738 on: March 02, 2014, 09:38:19 PM »
Its just crazy to me that we are even having this discussion (should we be a 7,8, or 9 seed).   When this season started, I (like most of you) felt like we'd be happy to be at least .500 and hopefully pick up a couple wins in the NIT.

This has been a fun team to watch and could/should be very good in the next couple years.  Regardless of seed, I just hope we get a favorable matchup(s) bracket wise that will allow us to win a game or two.
bears are fast...

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #739 on: March 02, 2014, 09:38:43 PM »
we are going to get a 6 yo.

If we get 2 more wins, then yes.

what happens if we win 4? because that is the minimum we are going to win preNCAAT.

Offline kstofer

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #740 on: March 02, 2014, 10:47:40 PM »
we are going to get a 6 yo.

If we get 2 more wins, then yes.

what happens if we win 4? because that is the minimum we are going to win preNCAAT.

If I knew that would happen I would root against us tomorrow so hard.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #741 on: March 03, 2014, 12:12:29 AM »
we are going to get a 6 yo.

If we get 2 more wins, then yes.

what happens if we win 4? because that is the minimum we are going to win preNCAAT.

If I knew that would happen I would root against us tomorrow so hard.

 :thumbs:

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #742 on: March 03, 2014, 09:05:37 AM »

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #743 on: March 03, 2014, 09:45:56 AM »
The way I'm seeing it is 5 wins (making us Big 12 tourney champs) gets us a 4 seed, 4 wins and runner up gets us a 5 seed, 3 wins and only 1 loss gets us the 6, 2 wins gets us a 7, 1 win gets us an 8 or 9 and, no wins gets us a 10 or 11.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #744 on: March 03, 2014, 09:52:30 AM »
The way I'm seeing it is 5 wins (making us Big 12 tourney champs) gets us a 4 seed, 4 wins and runner up gets us a 5 seed, 3 wins and only 1 loss gets us the 6, 2 wins gets us a 7, 1 win gets us an 8 or 9 and, no wins gets us a 10 or 11.

 :thumbs:

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #745 on: March 03, 2014, 09:53:16 AM »

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #746 on: March 03, 2014, 10:01:38 AM »
http://tw.nbcsports.com/K9S

7 seed

They have Tenn and Mizzou in the tourney.

 :'bye cruel world:

I also don't see how KU gets a 1 at this point. Worst 1 seed ever?  :dunno:
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #747 on: March 03, 2014, 10:39:11 AM »
http://tw.nbcsports.com/K9S

7 seed

They have Tenn and Mizzou in the tourney.

 :'bye cruel world:

I also don't see how KU gets a 1 at this point. Worst 1 seed ever?  :dunno:

2000 Michigan St was a 1 seed despite 7 losses.

And if WSU gets a 1 KU won't even be the worst 1 seed in this tournament.

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #748 on: March 03, 2014, 10:53:57 AM »
http://tw.nbcsports.com/K9S

7 seed

They have Tenn and Mizzou in the tourney.

 :'bye cruel world:

I also don't see how KU gets a 1 at this point. Worst 1 seed ever?  :dunno:

2000 Michigan St was a 1 seed despite 7 losses.

And if WSU gets a 1 KU won't even be the worst 1 seed in this tournament.

Yeah, I'm sure KU is really better than an undefeated team that nearly won it all last year.   :flush:
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline #LIFE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #749 on: March 03, 2014, 10:55:29 AM »
Palm has us as a #9 (on the bubble  :dubious:) vs. Pitt in STL.  Wichita st. as the 1

Lunardi the same just swapping 8-9 with Pitt