Author Topic: The Official Bracketology Thread  (Read 367229 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #625 on: February 26, 2014, 01:54:02 PM »
Lunardi has K-State potentially matching up with Wichita State in the 2nd round of the Midwest region.  I would be TSC'ing so hard for K-State if that game were to actually happen.  Not even the most butthurt of the butthurt 'tater squad could keep me from TSC'ing my ass off for that one.

 :tsc:

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4527
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #626 on: February 26, 2014, 02:04:59 PM »
Lunardi has K-State potentially matching up with Wichita State in the 2nd round of the Midwest region.  I would be TSC'ing so hard for K-State if that game were to actually happen.  Not even the most butthurt of the butthurt 'tater squad could keep me from TSC'ing my ass off for that one.

 :tsc:

You haven't even seen butthurt yet Beems, we're our best when the chips are down. Never say never.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline kstate4life

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 936
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #627 on: February 26, 2014, 02:14:23 PM »
Cats got some work to do to get out of the 8/9 seed matchup come March.  That work could start down at Tech.  FWIW, I have Ku as a 2, Isu as a 4, OU and Texas as 6 seeds right now.  Baylor at 6-8 probably barely in right now. 


Team/Seed    Record (Conf)   RPI     SOS    1-25    26-50      Other stat/comment
______________________________________________________________________________________________
7 UMass           21-5(8-4)      13       44        2-0    4-2          Beat GW and Vcu last 2 gms
7 UConn           21-6(9-5)      26       75        1-1    2-4          Beat Fla, Swept Memphis
7 N Mexico       21-5(12-2)     21       32       2-2     0-0          Beat SD St on Sat
7 Memphis       20-6(10-4)     37       86       0-2     3-4          Only have 4 wins vs top 150 rpi

8 KState          18-9(8-6)       42       42       3-4     3-1          good wins, bad road record
8 Stanford        18-8(9-5)       41       51       1-3     3-4         wins over Ucla and at Uconn
8 VCU              20-7(8-4)       25       49       1-2     2-2          Good win at Virg, split with GW
8 G Wash         20-7(8-5)       30       67       2-3     1-1          Good win over Creighton

9 Ariz St          19-8(8-6)       32        55       1-3     3-2          Beat AZ, but weak non con resume
9 Pitt               20-7(8-6)       33        53       0-6     1-0          Only good win is Stanford
9 SMU             22-6(11-4)      45       165      1-2     3-1          Beat Cincy, Swept UConn. But SOS 165, non con SOS 294
9 Cal               18-9(9-5)        49       47        1-4     2-2         Good win over AZ

 

Is there a website that lists this top to bottom somewhere?

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #628 on: February 26, 2014, 02:16:24 PM »
We'll probably lose to SMU in an 8/9 game.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #629 on: February 26, 2014, 02:21:29 PM »

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29139
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #630 on: February 26, 2014, 02:23:40 PM »
We'll probably lose to SMU in an 8/9 game.

do not want

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #631 on: February 26, 2014, 02:35:41 PM »
I'm amazed by how many people take Lunardi's seeding at face value.  (Or think they have some special insight into seeding of their own.)

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20953
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #632 on: February 26, 2014, 02:37:46 PM »
I'm amazed by how many people take Lunardi's seeding at face value.  (Or think they have some special insight into seeding of their own.)

Seems to me that you mean the exact opposite of what you actually said.


Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #633 on: February 26, 2014, 02:49:13 PM »
Cats got some work to do to get out of the 8/9 seed matchup come March.  That work could start down at Tech.  FWIW, I have Ku as a 2, Isu as a 4, OU and Texas as 6 seeds right now.  Baylor at 6-8 probably barely in right now. 


Team/Seed    Record (Conf)   RPI     SOS    1-25    26-50      Other stat/comment
______________________________________________________________________________________________
7 UMass           21-5(8-4)      13       44        2-0    4-2          Beat GW and Vcu last 2 gms
7 UConn           21-6(9-5)      26       75        1-1    2-4          Beat Fla, Swept Memphis
7 N Mexico       21-5(12-2)     21       32       2-2     0-0          Beat SD St on Sat
7 Memphis       20-6(10-4)     37       86       0-2     3-4          Only have 4 wins vs top 150 rpi

8 KState          18-9(8-6)       42       42       3-4     3-1          good wins, bad road record
8 Stanford        18-8(9-5)       41       51       1-3     3-4         wins over Ucla and at Uconn
8 VCU              20-7(8-4)       25       49       1-2     2-2          Good win at Virg, split with GW
8 G Wash         20-7(8-5)       30       67       2-3     1-1          Good win over Creighton

9 Ariz St          19-8(8-6)       32        55       1-3     3-2          Beat AZ, but weak non con resume
9 Pitt               20-7(8-6)       33        53       0-6     1-0          Only good win is Stanford
9 SMU             22-6(11-4)      45       165      1-2     3-1          Beat Cincy, Swept UConn. But SOS 165, non con SOS 294
9 Cal               18-9(9-5)        49       47        1-4     2-2         Good win over AZ

 

Is there a website that lists this top to bottom somewhere?

I wish we could play UMass', UNM's or Memphis' conference schedules. Our seeding would be swapped.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #634 on: February 26, 2014, 02:50:22 PM »
Lunardi has K-State potentially matching up with Wichita State in the 2nd round of the Midwest region.  I would be TSC'ing so hard for K-State if that game were to actually happen.  Not even the most butthurt of the butthurt 'tater squad could keep me from TSC'ing my ass off for that one.

 :tsc:

NOTHING that has EVER been posted on the internet better demonstrates the collective fear that phoggie-nation has for the rise of Wichita State basketball than this example by beems.

Well done, sir.

 :thumbsup:
bears are fast...

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #635 on: February 26, 2014, 02:51:50 PM »
I would love to watch Baker throw it down in Wiggins face!  :love:

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20953
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #636 on: February 26, 2014, 02:57:37 PM »
Please, Baker would get his buns kicked and Wiggins would roll. Don't be a baguette.

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16019
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #637 on: February 26, 2014, 02:59:04 PM »
We'll probably lose to SMU in an 8/9 game.
I might cry when Nick Russell ends the season  :frown:
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36550
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #638 on: February 26, 2014, 03:02:04 PM »
During our game last night, Lunardi said something about WSU being the last #1 and KU being the first #2 and that he hopes it happens and that they play each other in the regional finals. 

I would love that.  Would be a fantastic game.

Also, I hope we are in a diff region.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #639 on: February 26, 2014, 03:05:45 PM »
Please, Baker would get his buns kicked and Wiggins would roll. Don't be a baguette.

Andy would probably rotate over late and just watch Baker dunk, kinda like he did after Sprads blew by Embiid with that sick crossover.

 :gocho:
bears are fast...

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #640 on: February 26, 2014, 03:07:21 PM »


Is there a website that lists this top to bottom somewhere?

There are a couple of sites out there that will show RPI, SOS, records against top 25 and 26-50.   I use ESPN for the most part. 
For my breakdowns, I look at each team in depth.   A top 25 rpi win over New Mexico isn't near as impressive as a top 25 win over Florida or KU. 

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #641 on: February 26, 2014, 03:09:12 PM »
RON BAKER IS THE MOST VALUABLE PLAYER IN THIS STATE! Jk. It's Foster.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #642 on: February 26, 2014, 03:11:36 PM »
Lunardi has K-State potentially matching up with Wichita State in the 2nd round of the Midwest region.  I would be TSC'ing so hard for K-State if that game were to actually happen.  Not even the most butthurt of the butthurt 'tater squad could keep me from TSC'ing my ass off for that one.

 :tsc:

NOTHING that has EVER been posted on the internet better demonstrates the collective fear that phoggie-nation has for the rise of Wichita State basketball than this example by beems.

Well done, sir.

 :thumbsup:


If you really think people are worried about "the rise" of Wichita State, you're an even bigger dumbass than previously thought.  Only the most butthurt of 'taters would try to portray TSC'ing for K-State as a negative.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #643 on: February 26, 2014, 03:12:36 PM »
Please, Baker would get his buns kicked and Wiggins would roll. Don't be a baguette.

Andy would probably rotate over late and just watch Baker dunk, kinda like he did after Sprads blew by Embiid with that sick crossover.

 :gocho:


OMG A GUARD WAS ABLE TO CROSS OVER A 7-FOOT CENTER!  LET'S FARM HUMP IT 'TIL INFINITY!!!

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #644 on: February 26, 2014, 03:19:22 PM »
Please, Baker would get his buns kicked and Wiggins would roll. Don't be a baguette.

Andy would probably rotate over late and just watch Baker dunk, kinda like he did after Sprads blew by Embiid with that sick crossover.

 :gocho:


OMG A GUARD WAS ABLE TO CROSS OVER A 7-FOOT CENTER!  LET'S FARM HUMP IT 'TIL INFINITY!!!

 :gocho:
bears are fast...

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36550
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #645 on: February 26, 2014, 03:20:41 PM »
Please, Baker would get his buns kicked and Wiggins would roll. Don't be a baguette.

Andy would probably rotate over late and just watch Baker dunk, kinda like he did after Sprads blew by Embiid with that sick crossover.

 :gocho:


OMG A GUARD WAS ABLE TO CROSS OVER A 7-FOOT CENTER!  LET'S FARM HUMP IT 'TIL INFINITY!!!

This is exactly why YouTube was invented.  Exactly.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #646 on: February 26, 2014, 03:22:07 PM »
OMG A TOP RATED GUARD BOUNCED IT THROUGH A SLOW WHITE KIDS LEGS. LET'S ROCK CHALK THAT crap TO DEATH!  :tsc:

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20953
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #647 on: February 26, 2014, 03:23:10 PM »
OMG A TOP RATED GUARD BOUNCED IT THROUGH A SLOW WHITE KIDS LEGS. LET'S ROCK CHALK THAT crap TO DEATH!  :tsc:

I'm kinda over it.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #648 on: February 26, 2014, 03:25:05 PM »
Please, Baker would get his buns kicked and Wiggins would roll. Don't be a baguette.

Andy would probably rotate over late and just watch Baker dunk, kinda like he did after Sprads blew by Embiid with that sick crossover.

 :gocho:


OMG A GUARD WAS ABLE TO CROSS OVER A 7-FOOT CENTER!  LET'S FARM HUMP IT 'TIL INFINITY!!!

This is exactly why YouTube was invented.  Exactly.

All caps post too, tho.

 :Woot:
bears are fast...

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #649 on: February 26, 2014, 03:25:55 PM »
Cats got some work to do to get out of the 8/9 seed matchup come March.  That work could start down at Tech.  FWIW, I have Ku as a 2, Isu as a 4, OU and Texas as 6 seeds right now.  Baylor at 6-8 probably barely in right now. 


Team/Seed    Record (Conf)   RPI     SOS    1-25    26-50      Other stat/comment
______________________________________________________________________________________________
7 UMass           21-5(8-4)      13       44        2-0    4-2          Beat GW and Vcu last 2 gms
7 UConn           21-6(9-5)      26       75        1-1    2-4          Beat Fla, Swept Memphis
7 N Mexico       21-5(12-2)     21       32       2-2     0-0          Beat SD St on Sat
7 Memphis       20-6(10-4)     37       86       0-2     3-4          Only have 4 wins vs top 150 rpi

8 KState          18-9(8-6)       42       42       3-4     3-1          good wins, bad road record
8 Stanford        18-8(9-5)       41       51       1-3     3-4         wins over Ucla and at Uconn
8 VCU              20-7(8-4)       25       49       1-2     2-2          Good win at Virg, split with GW
8 G Wash         20-7(8-5)       30       67       2-3     1-1          Good win over Creighton

9 Ariz St          19-8(8-6)       32        55       1-3     3-2          Beat AZ, but weak non con resume
9 Pitt               20-7(8-6)       33        53       0-6     1-0          Only good win is Stanford
9 SMU             22-6(11-4)      45       165      1-2     3-1          Beat Cincy, Swept UConn. But SOS 165, non con SOS 294
9 Cal               18-9(9-5)        49       47        1-4     2-2         Good win over AZ

 

Is there a website that lists this top to bottom somewhere?

I wish we could play UMass', UNM's or Memphis' conference schedules. Our seeding would be swapped.

The only team on that list scares me is New Mexico. If we end facing them in a 8/9 or 7/10 games I'll be pretty  :curse: