Poll

Will the "cool" Pinstripe Bowl K-State be on the new field at BSFS?

Yes . . . it's cool.  Currie Prevails.
NO . . . OB Wins again.

Author Topic: BSFS Expansion Thread  (Read 4636471 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1475 on: August 02, 2011, 04:03:50 PM »
Should name the restrooms after the guy.

(Name Here) Family Memorial Restrooms

you'll crap bricks

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1476 on: August 02, 2011, 04:25:59 PM »
Why was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.

incorrect.


This subcontractor is working on one of my projects, sad to hear the news.   

Quote
Employers are required to assess the workplace to determine if the walking/working surfaces on which employees are to work have the strength and structural integrity to safely support workers. Employees are not permitted to work on those surfaces until it has been determined that the surfaces have the requisite strength and structural integrity to support the workers. Once employers have determined that the surface is safe for employees to work on, the employer must select one of the options listed for the work operation if a fall hazard is present.

For example, if an employee is exposed to falling 6 feet (l .8 meters) or more from an unprotected side or edge, the employer must select either a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system to protect the worker. Similar requirements are prescribed for other fall hazards as follows.

http://www.osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/subpartm.html

I don't think a board that can slip out of place is adequate structural integrity.

the apparent plank failure is a seperate issue.

A worker on a properly erected scaffold with guardrails is not required to wear fall protection.

First off, you sir are a dick. Yes, the guy should have responsibility for his own actions and should not have put himself at risk on a suspect scaffold without taking into account the possibility of falling. He paid for that sin. On to the company, I don't think OSHA will be looking at this way, the company was allowing him to work on scaffolding that lacked structural integrity...the board being able to break or fall out of place. It doesn't matter if you have guard rails, fall protection, catch nets,whatever. If the floor is able to fall out from under you, the equipment in use lacks structural integrity, as stated in the OSHA guidelines. Which is the first step in this whole process as stated in the paragraph I quoted, if you read it.

I'll qualify my opinion with 20% of my young life being spent working construction in residential, commercial, and military base settings. I also ran a couple jobs myself :)

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1477 on: August 02, 2011, 07:25:46 PM »
Did someone get this on webcam?





put "OK_Cat" in the corner instead of goEMAW.com, imo.

stop being so afraid of the outside world, willie watanabe.

OK, rando message board guy.  :comeatme:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Mikeyis4dcats

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5040
  • pogonophobia: n. a fear of beards
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1478 on: August 02, 2011, 08:58:10 PM »
Why was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.

incorrect.


This subcontractor is working on one of my projects, sad to hear the news.   

Quote
Employers are required to assess the workplace to determine if the walking/working surfaces on which employees are to work have the strength and structural integrity to safely support workers. Employees are not permitted to work on those surfaces until it has been determined that the surfaces have the requisite strength and structural integrity to support the workers. Once employers have determined that the surface is safe for employees to work on, the employer must select one of the options listed for the work operation if a fall hazard is present.

For example, if an employee is exposed to falling 6 feet (l .8 meters) or more from an unprotected side or edge, the employer must select either a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system to protect the worker. Similar requirements are prescribed for other fall hazards as follows.

http://www.osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/subpartm.html

I don't think a board that can slip out of place is adequate structural integrity.

the apparent plank failure is a seperate issue.

A worker on a properly erected scaffold with guardrails is not required to wear fall protection.

First off, you sir are a dick. Yes, the guy should have responsibility for his own actions and should not have put himself at risk on a suspect scaffold without taking into account the possibility of falling. He paid for that sin. On to the company, I don't think OSHA will be looking at this way, the company was allowing him to work on scaffolding that lacked structural integrity...the board being able to break or fall out of place. It doesn't matter if you have guard rails, fall protection, catch nets,whatever. If the floor is able to fall out from under you, the equipment in use lacks structural integrity, as stated in the OSHA guidelines. Which is the first step in this whole process as stated in the paragraph I quoted, if you read it.

I'll qualify my opinion with 20% of my young life being spent working construction in residential, commercial, and military base settings. I also ran a couple jobs myself :)

aside from your ramblings, back to your original post:  it is not an OSHA violation to not wear personal fall protection when working on scaffold with a full guardrail.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1479 on: August 02, 2011, 09:55:41 PM »
We need an old priest and a young priest from Notre Dame to exorcise the demon restrooms now.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1480 on: August 02, 2011, 10:12:03 PM »
Seems like a waste of time.  The old priest would probably just molest the crap out of the young one and waste everyone's time.

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1481 on: August 03, 2011, 12:35:40 AM »
We need an old priest and a young priest from Notre Dame to exorcise the demon restrooms now.

eff that, I'm all for seeing some haunted crap.

[spoiler]
*see what I did there?*[/spoiler]

Offline j-dub

  • fattyfest dance champion '14
  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • "I wanna get hurt!"
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1482 on: August 03, 2011, 12:52:07 AM »
ok_cat just doing his thing. taking life day by day. hoping people die.
"I started calling him John during the game, cause he was rocking it like No. 7 -- like Elway," Harper said."

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1483 on: August 03, 2011, 09:46:12 AM »
ok_cat just doing his thing. taking life day by day. hoping people die.


i don't hope for people to die, but they do.  guess what?  you're going to die some day.   :comeatme:

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1484 on: August 03, 2011, 12:45:29 PM »
Unfortunate wording from Ubben:

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/31196/lunch-links-man-dies-at-k-state-stadium

Quote
•A construction worker at LHC Bill Snyder Family Stadium fell to his death this week.

And further down the page....

Quote
•Kansas State has a lot more bodies to work with this year, and that's exciting for coach LHC Bill Snyder, writes Kellis Robinett of the Wichita Eagle.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1485 on: August 03, 2011, 12:46:52 PM »
 :lol:

Offline I_have_purplewood

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3019
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1486 on: August 03, 2011, 12:55:45 PM »
Will the football team wear a 'Freemasons' patch this year?  Would add intrigue and conspiracy to an already exciting season I think.  :lynchmob:  <---- But a Freemason logo.
Fifteen minutes later, when the Kansas locker room opened its doors to the media, the Jayhawks were still crying. Literally, bawling. All of them. I've never seen anything like it, and I've seen devastated college locker rooms -- after losses in the Final Four, the national championship game -- ever

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1487 on: August 03, 2011, 02:01:17 PM »
Will the football team wear a 'Freemasons' patch this year?  Would add intrigue and conspiracy to an already exciting season I think.  :lynchmob:  <---- But a Freemason logo.
:excited:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1488 on: August 03, 2011, 06:25:23 PM »
Unfortunate wording from Ubben:

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/31196/lunch-links-man-dies-at-k-state-stadium

Quote
•A construction worker at LHC Bill Snyder Family Stadium fell to his death this week.

And further down the page....

Quote
•Kansas State has a lot more bodies to work with this year, and that's exciting for coach LHC Bill Snyder, writes Kellis Robinett of the Wichita Eagle.

that's fantastic.  count on snyder to feast on the death of young men.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1489 on: August 04, 2011, 11:26:28 AM »
CTR is escalating: Mack Brown's unofficial slogan for this season is "Brick by Brick"

http://www.statesman.com/sports/longhorns/brown-says-longhorns-rebuilding-brick-by-brick-1691525.html?cxtype=rss_longhorns

Quote from: Mack Brown
Too soon?

 :shakesfist:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38078
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1490 on: August 04, 2011, 11:28:50 AM »
CTR is escalating: Mack Brown's unofficial slogan for this season is "Brick by Brick"

http://www.statesman.com/sports/longhorns/brown-says-longhorns-rebuilding-brick-by-brick-1691525.html?cxtype=rss_longhorns

Quote from: Mack Brown
Too soon?

 :shakesfist:

Shots Fired!!!  UT game will be filled with salutes in the endzone and moments of silence. 

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1491 on: August 04, 2011, 11:29:55 AM »
CTR is escalating: Mack Brown's unofficial slogan for this season is "Brick by Brick"

http://www.statesman.com/sports/longhorns/brown-says-longhorns-rebuilding-brick-by-brick-1691525.html?cxtype=rss_longhorns

Quote from: Mack Brown
Too soon?

 :shakesfist:

Shots Fired!!!  UT game will be filled with salutes in the endzone and moments of silence. 

I bet those assholes don't even give us our moment of silence.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1492 on: August 04, 2011, 11:31:54 AM »
This year's for you, Mr. Mason.  :lynchmob:

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1493 on: August 10, 2011, 11:17:53 AM »
Has there been a public meeting or whatever yet?  :shakesfist:

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1494 on: August 10, 2011, 01:19:55 PM »
CTR is escalating: Mack Brown's unofficial slogan for this season is "Brick by Brick"

http://www.statesman.com/sports/longhorns/brown-says-longhorns-rebuilding-brick-by-brick-1691525.html?cxtype=rss_longhorns

Quote from: Mack Brown
Too soon?

 :shakesfist:

Shots Fired!!!  UT game will be filled with salutes in the endzone and moments of silence. 


Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1495 on: August 12, 2011, 01:26:36 PM »
thought this tidbit was interesting...

Quote
By the time oscar Ratner's accountants decided that Gehry's fee was a tad steep (selling Ratner's third home, on Montauk, for $10 million didn't make up the shortfall) and jettisoned his blueprints in favor of an airplane hangar designed by Ellerbe-Becket, Wilpon's architects, the ubiquitous HOK (they call themselves Populous now, vainly hoping to soften their well-earned image of builders, not designers), had designed a schizophrenic mess.

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/6851333/the-architecture-disaster
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1496 on: August 12, 2011, 01:36:14 PM »
thought this tidbit was interesting...

Quote
By the time oscar Ratner's accountants decided that Gehry's fee was a tad steep (selling Ratner's third home, on Montauk, for $10 million didn't make up the shortfall) and jettisoned his blueprints in favor of an airplane hangar designed by Ellerbe-Becket, Wilpon's architects, the ubiquitous HOK (they call themselves Populous now, vainly hoping to soften their well-earned image of builders, not designers), had designed a schizophrenic mess.

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/6851333/the-architecture-disaster

like I said a while back, populous is nothing special, other than they've done more "nothing special" things than probably anyone else.

Offline Donald

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 26
  • Quack Quack Quack
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1497 on: August 14, 2011, 12:10:18 PM »
Quote
Very pumped about big anncmnt for future of #KState Athletics tomorrow - and it has nothing to do w/ conference expansion/realingment!

 :ck:

http://twitter.com/#!/BrianSmoller

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1498 on: August 14, 2011, 12:11:35 PM »
Quote
Very pumped about big anncmnt for future of #KState Athletics tomorrow - and it has nothing to do w/ conference expansion/realingment!

 :ck:

http://twitter.com/#!/BrianSmoller

Good 1st post

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7175
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1499 on: August 16, 2011, 04:23:17 PM »
Seems like I read a while back where people have seen the latest renderings (maybe not?), if so, when are they going to leak out. Seems like they would have by now.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.