0 Members and 14 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on March 29, 2012, 10:38:35 AMQuote from: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 10:30:12 AMQuote from: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 10:26:27 AMrandy bennett. would take over most of these clowns. People say he hasn't gotten a better job because he's kind of a butthole. He would probably be at the very top of the burn the mother down with everyone in it list. I found that article before I hit "post"http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/03/05/030512-sports-wolken-column-1-3/so bennett has pretty much dominated everyone but gonzaga. tied for first last year and won the conference outright this year.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_BennettIts probably highly illogical, but Asbury actually makes me a bit apprehensive about a guy like Bennett. Can he translate success at a tiny private west coast school to Kansas State?That said, he's definitely worth looking at.all his good players are from australia
Quote from: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 10:30:12 AMQuote from: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 10:26:27 AMrandy bennett. would take over most of these clowns. People say he hasn't gotten a better job because he's kind of a butthole. He would probably be at the very top of the burn the mother down with everyone in it list. I found that article before I hit "post"http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/03/05/030512-sports-wolken-column-1-3/so bennett has pretty much dominated everyone but gonzaga. tied for first last year and won the conference outright this year.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_BennettIts probably highly illogical, but Asbury actually makes me a bit apprehensive about a guy like Bennett. Can he translate success at a tiny private west coast school to Kansas State?That said, he's definitely worth looking at.
Quote from: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 10:26:27 AMrandy bennett. would take over most of these clowns. People say he hasn't gotten a better job because he's kind of a butthole. He would probably be at the very top of the burn the mother down with everyone in it list. I found that article before I hit "post"http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/03/05/030512-sports-wolken-column-1-3/so bennett has pretty much dominated everyone but gonzaga. tied for first last year and won the conference outright this year.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Bennett
randy bennett. would take over most of these clowns. People say he hasn't gotten a better job because he's kind of a butthole. He would probably be at the very top of the burn the mother down with everyone in it list. I found that article before I hit "post"http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/03/05/030512-sports-wolken-column-1-3/
in the end, EMAW will always win.
I can see why Buzz isn't leavingMarquette Big East Buzz Williams $2,834,685 N/A $2,834,685 N/A
Quote from: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 10:42:21 AMI only care about recruitingwhy?
I only care about recruiting
Quote from: ChiCat on March 29, 2012, 10:12:44 AMFor the sake of continuity, I would vote we set up the OOD to have the benches like Vandy. I think that provides a really underrated advantageTrim had a very good stance on these benches as we watched one of their games.
For the sake of continuity, I would vote we set up the OOD to have the benches like Vandy. I think that provides a really underrated advantage
Quote from: Doberman_CATS!!! on March 29, 2012, 10:43:11 AMI can see why Buzz isn't leavingMarquette Big East Buzz Williams $2,834,685 N/A $2,834,685 N/A1.987 mil of that was a one time extraordinary bonus for retention fwiw
I 100% agree that "long term-ness" should be at the bottom of any list of criteria for a coaching hire, and probably not even on the list.
Quote from: rick daris on March 29, 2012, 10:27:52 AMgod damnit _fan. what does this mean? you either want him or you don't. i swear to god you people need to stop talking about what someone is worth. you guys did this crap with frank when he was still a coach here and it was wrong then too. "well he's already making 1.55, i mean maybe bump him up to 1.8 but not 2.0. i mean i don't think he's worth that much." it was stupid then and it's just as stupid now. stop.I think we should offer Izzo or Calipari or somebody like that $6 million per year or so. I mean seriously what is the difference between $2 million and $6 million? Not that much.
god damnit _fan. what does this mean? you either want him or you don't. i swear to god you people need to stop talking about what someone is worth. you guys did this crap with frank when he was still a coach here and it was wrong then too. "well he's already making 1.55, i mean maybe bump him up to 1.8 but not 2.0. i mean i don't think he's worth that much." it was stupid then and it's just as stupid now. stop.
Also _fan's signature is the best I've ever seen, no hyperbole.
Xavier A-10 Chris Mack $484,399 N/A $484,399 N/We throw $2mill at him, guarantee he will listen.Also, thoughts on Mike Brey at ND? He's only making $570k. And you know he's clean being all catholic and stuff
Antigua has great hair and style
Quote from: rick daris on March 29, 2012, 10:43:55 AMQuote from: michigancat on March 29, 2012, 10:42:21 AMI only care about recruitingwhy?recruit well and good things will happen no matter what. I also think it's the easiest way to evaluate "unproven" coaches. If I'm an AD, I'm asking a candidate to name their top 5 relationships with AAU programs, examples of under-the-radar recruits that exceeded conventional expectations, examples of recruiting victories over "better" programs, and examples of recruiting losses and why the losses occurred. IMO everyone that is a D1 Head Coach or assistant is competent at "x's and o's" because basketball is a brutally simple game and 9 times out of 10 talent wins out. What truly separates coaches are their recruiting relationships and approach.
I want Mack. X has been a fantastically entertaining team to watch over the last several years.
judges forgot to list tinkle as a possibility. dude would be a strong hire.