0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Chris Mack? seems like X recruits well/decent. they have 5 top 150 players in the last two years ('10 and '11) - ksu has only had 2, both in '11 and both were rated below the 2 that X had.
Quote from: catzacker on January 18, 2011, 02:08:32 PMChris Mack? seems like X recruits well/decent. they have 5 top 150 players in the last two years ('10 and '11) - ksu has only had 2, both in '11 and both were rated below the 2 that X had. Pastner is more realistic.
We need someone with K-State ties. The perfect hire is either Steve Henson or Tim Jankovic. I would lean towards Tim because he has shown he can win at a smaller school and he has paid the necessary dues in the coaching world. If either of them were our coach right now we would still be ranked in the top 10, and there is absolutely no question about that.
Quote from: Tannoudji on January 18, 2011, 04:07:46 PMWe need someone with K-State ties. The perfect hire is either Steve Henson or Tim Jankovic. I would lean towards Tim because he has shown he can win at a smaller school and he has paid the necessary dues in the coaching world. If either of them were our coach right now we would still be ranked in the top 10, and there is absolutely no question about that.didn't think 'noudj was a sock until this post.
Quote from: michigancat on January 18, 2011, 04:30:01 PMQuote from: catzacker on January 18, 2011, 02:08:32 PMChris Mack? seems like X recruits well/decent. they have 5 top 150 players in the last two years ('10 and '11) - ksu has only had 2, both in '11 and both were rated below the 2 that X had. Pastner is more realistic.that's depressing. was billy clyde's recruiting terrible?
Quote from: catzacker on January 18, 2011, 07:21:25 PMQuote from: michigancat on January 18, 2011, 04:30:01 PMQuote from: catzacker on January 18, 2011, 02:08:32 PMChris Mack? seems like X recruits well/decent. they have 5 top 150 players in the last two years ('10 and '11) - ksu has only had 2, both in '11 and both were rated below the 2 that X had. Pastner is more realistic.that's depressing. was billy clyde's recruiting terrible?No. It was pretty good for aTm. Also hired Bryan Davis's dad and got DeAndre Jordan.
It was pretty good for aTm.
Quote from: michigancat on January 18, 2011, 07:39:06 PMIt was pretty good for aTm.it was really bad at kentucky.
also, i will bump this thread mercilessly in the future.
What's Lute Olsen doing?
Quote from: michigancat on January 18, 2011, 04:30:01 PMQuote from: catzacker on January 18, 2011, 02:08:32 PMChris Mack? seems like X recruits well/decent. they have 5 top 150 players in the last two years ('10 and '11) - ksu has only had 2, both in '11 and both were rated below the 2 that X had. Pastner is more realistic.Neither are realistic.
Avery Johnson? Sort of young - has a ring in the assn as a player and success as a HC as well. Oh and you know he is VERY elite-smelling - and his voice is adorable.