Author Topic: Under 700 yds!  (Read 2439 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Under 700 yds!
« on: October 23, 2010, 07:53:22 PM »
Cosh really got the boys to 'buckle up' at the end


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2010, 07:54:40 PM »
Hang a banner in your dining room Cosh, you piece of crap.

We bended today, not sure if we broke.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2010, 07:57:20 PM »
oh something bent.  Our defense at the waist with a big man behind them.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Joker

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1395
  • Resident Play-Hard Chartologist
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2010, 08:00:52 PM »
vs KU    678 yards        8.1 yards per play


vs KSU  679 yards        9.1 yards per play


Baylor owns the state of Kansas right now.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2010, 08:05:05 PM »
Terrible defense. But despite that, if the offense doesn't play terrible much of the second half, we still should've had a much better chance to win that game.

And with this bad of defense, we are still likely to be a 7-5 team, and if we can steal one of these next two at home, maybe 8-4. Still.

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2010, 08:08:37 PM »
Terrible defense. But despite that, if the offense doesn't play terrible much of the second half, we still should've had a much better chance to win that game.

And with this bad of defense, we are still likely to be a 7-5 team, and if we can steal one of these next two at home, maybe 8-4. Still.

tend to agree.  i will meltdown in a bad way if we lose to Colorado though.

Offline Joker

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1395
  • Resident Play-Hard Chartologist
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2010, 08:09:35 PM »
Terrible defense. But despite that, if the offense doesn't play terrible much of the second half, we still should've had a much better chance to win that game.

And with this bad of defense, we are still likely to be a 7-5 team, and if we can steal one of these next two at home, maybe 8-4. Still.

I refuse to buy into your optimism until you do the next _FANalysis (newly improved with screencap diagrams).

Offline catsdo

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 243
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2010, 08:10:40 PM »
Hang a banner in your dining room Cosh, you piece of crap.



Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2010, 08:12:56 PM »
Terrible defense. But despite that, if the offense doesn't play terrible much of the second half, we still should've had a much better chance to win that game.

And with this bad of defense, we are still likely to be a 7-5 team, and if we can steal one of these next two at home, maybe 8-4. Still.

Obviously Texas is a lock W and North Texas I think we can handle. 7-5 the way I see it.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #9 on: October 23, 2010, 08:16:04 PM »
Terrible defense. But despite that, if the offense doesn't play terrible much of the second half, we still should've had a much better chance to win that game.

And with this bad of defense, we are still likely to be a 7-5 team, and if we can steal one of these next two at home, maybe 8-4. Still.

I refuse to buy into your optimism until you do the next _FANalysis (newly improved with screencap diagrams).

Match-ups. We will still give up yards, but it is nice to know we are facing two teams without qb run threats.  And OSU's defense is not very good.

Offline Pittcat

  • Resident Purveyor of Above Avererage Staplers.
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1114
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2010, 08:17:09 PM »
Terrible defense. But despite that, if the offense doesn't play terrible much of the second half, we still should've had a much better chance to win that game.

And with this bad of defense, we are still likely to be a 7-5 team, and if we can steal one of these next two at home, maybe 8-4. Still.

I refuse to buy into your optimism until you do the next _FANalysis (newly improved with screencap diagrams).

Match-ups. We will still give up yards, but it is nice to know we are facing two teams without qb run threats.  And OSU's defense is not very good.

Can we win a shootout vs. OSU?  I'm not sold on that.
3021  RIP

Offline Perry

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 444
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2010, 08:19:37 PM »
How much did RGIII have to run on us? Didn't sound like it was a lot.

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2010, 08:20:29 PM »
Terrible defense. But despite that, if the offense doesn't play terrible much of the second half, we still should've had a much better chance to win that game.

And with this bad of defense, we are still likely to be a 7-5 team, and if we can steal one of these next two at home, maybe 8-4. Still.

I refuse to buy into your optimism until you do the next _FANalysis (newly improved with screencap diagrams).

Match-ups. We will still give up yards, but it is nice to know we are facing two teams without qb run threats.  And OSU's defense is not very good.

RG3 only had 6 carries for 8 yards. Yes, he's clearly a threat, but don't you think we should have had a better gameplan for the now feared Baylor passing attack?
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53966
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2010, 08:22:08 PM »
How much did RGIII have to run on us? Didn't sound like it was a lot.

This.  We didn't get beat my a running QB today.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Under 700 yds!
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2010, 08:32:20 PM »
How much did RGIII have to run on us? Didn't sound like it was a lot.

This.  We didn't get beat my a running QB today.

Won't deny that Griffin did not beat us with heis legs. But, the threat makes an enormous difference in how you scheme to stop Baylor and this was likely a huge reason Finley had the game if his life. 

OSU could likely have a ton of yards, but I like our chances to get some stops without the qb run threat.