Author Topic: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV  (Read 8429 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #50 on: January 22, 2017, 08:02:41 PM »
Cats did an amazing job of not letting one turnover turn into 2,3,4. That was huge.

Except for the LOLable stretch of five second counts

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #51 on: January 22, 2017, 08:22:52 PM »
WVU is trash

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #52 on: January 22, 2017, 08:31:49 PM »
Sneed should play better on offense and he'll play more. Stokes kind of has to be on the floor a lot.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20997
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #53 on: January 22, 2017, 10:02:10 PM »
Sneed should play better on offense and he'll play more. Stokes kind of has to be on the floor a lot.

Even when he is on the floor, he will go stretches without even touching the ball because Wes and Kam get dribble happy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #54 on: January 22, 2017, 10:08:31 PM »
Sneed should play better on offense and he'll play more. Stokes kind of has to be on the floor a lot.

Sneed plays very good offense when he's on the floor. Maybe you meant defense? He's pretty at creating steals but seems to struggle at times staying in front of his man.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #55 on: January 22, 2017, 10:10:31 PM »
He was bad offensively last night (no pts, several turnovers), hence fewer minutes.

It's not that hard, guys.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #56 on: January 22, 2017, 10:13:31 PM »
Based on conf play, it's maurice who should be getting more minutes.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #57 on: January 22, 2017, 10:14:00 PM »
Ftr, i love sneed
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #58 on: January 22, 2017, 10:15:14 PM »
Sneed played 11 minutes, took two shots, and had 2 turnovers. Tough to deduce much from that other than he barely played. On the season he turns it over at a lower rate than Stokes and Westicles. oscar recruited a potentially really good player and he should play him more.

Based on conf play, it's maurice who should be getting more minutes.

I'd also be fine with this, although his defense is probably worse than Sneed's.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #59 on: January 22, 2017, 10:19:30 PM »
"On the season"? Comparing turnover stats of primary ball handlers to guys not expected to dribble? Come on michigancat

He was bad last night and played minutes accordingly. I'm guessing most freshman struggle like that against wvu.

Maurice is boarding and defending like a grown man in conf play. Sneed's production has dropped off
« Last Edit: January 22, 2017, 10:23:02 PM by Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) »
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #60 on: January 22, 2017, 10:24:12 PM »
"On the season"? come on michigancat

He was bad last night and played accordingly. I'm guessing most freshman struggle like that against wvu.

Maurice is boarding and defending like a grown man in conf play.

you don't know what the eff you're talking about

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #61 on: January 22, 2017, 10:36:47 PM »
Okay, Michigancat
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #62 on: January 22, 2017, 11:09:04 PM »
I think M-Cat is right. Sneed has 10 steals in 7 Conference games, playing less than half the game.  That's very solid.  But he does struggle at times on defense.

His shot selection is really good. His 10-15 on 2pt in conference play shows that. 
It does seem like when he has a few TOs, that Weber plays him less. He had 2 TOs in the 1st half Saturday and the other game he didn't play much was Texas (3 TOs 11 min)
I'd like to see him get 22-24 minutes consistently each game.

I really have enjoyed the way Maurice has hit the boards last few games.


Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #63 on: January 22, 2017, 11:31:37 PM »
punishing a player for committing two turnovers in 7 minutes of play is pretty stupid (especially when they aren't 7 concurrent minutes). It isn't like Sneed was in over his head out there.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #64 on: January 22, 2017, 11:45:56 PM »
I could have sworn we won that game yesterday.

Sneed's +/- was -16  :horrorsurprise:
He also clanked two FTs.

He's a great player and will be fine, just had a bad game. It's okay.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #65 on: January 23, 2017, 06:55:39 AM »
In general, I would like to see Sneed play more, but I saw nothing that warranted more minutes on Saturday. Other guys were playing well and especially in the first half he wasn't that great.

I'm happy that oscar has pretty much gone with a limited rotation in conference play, especially with DJamer playing over 70% of the time. Sneed, Ervin, and Maurice will get their spots to rotate in, but for the most part I think this rotation works.

Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #66 on: January 23, 2017, 10:09:28 AM »
In general, I would like to see Sneed play more, but I saw nothing that warranted more minutes on Saturday. Other guys were playing well and especially in the first half he wasn't that great.

I'm happy that oscar has pretty much gone with a limited rotation in conference play, especially with DJamer playing over 70% of the time. Sneed, Ervin, and Maurice will get their spots to rotate in, but for the most part I think this rotation works.

one thing i like about our lack of depth this year is that it doesn't give oscar a chance to screw things up. i mean, when our only rotation critiques are whether maurice or sneed should play 3 mins more a game, i'm fairly content. 

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #67 on: January 23, 2017, 04:05:29 PM »
In general, I would like to see Sneed play more, but I saw nothing that warranted more minutes on Saturday. Other guys were playing well and especially in the first half he wasn't that great.

I'm happy that oscar has pretty much gone with a limited rotation in conference play, especially with DJamer playing over 70% of the time. Sneed, Ervin, and Maurice will get their spots to rotate in, but for the most part I think this rotation works.

one thing i like about our lack of depth this year is that it doesn't give oscar a chance to screw things up. i mean, when our only rotation critiques are whether maurice or sneed should play 3 mins more a game, i'm fairly content.

We only have a lack of depth at the forward/center position, and the more Isaiah plays decently the less of an issue this is.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #68 on: January 23, 2017, 04:52:08 PM »
In general, I would like to see Sneed play more, but I saw nothing that warranted more minutes on Saturday. Other guys were playing well and especially in the first half he wasn't that great.

I'm happy that oscar has pretty much gone with a limited rotation in conference play, especially with DJamer playing over 70% of the time. Sneed, Ervin, and Maurice will get their spots to rotate in, but for the most part I think this rotation works.

one thing i like about our lack of depth this year is that it doesn't give oscar a chance to screw things up. i mean, when our only rotation critiques are whether maurice or sneed should play 3 mins more a game, i'm fairly content.

We only have a lack of depth at the forward/center position, and the more Isaiah plays decently the less of an issue this is.

Stokes and Brown both play more minutes than Jacob Pullen did at any point in his career. Not saying you're wrong about our backcourt depth, but it certainly implies we don't take full advantage of our depth.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #69 on: January 23, 2017, 06:43:32 PM »
In general, I would like to see Sneed play more, but I saw nothing that warranted more minutes on Saturday. Other guys were playing well and especially in the first half he wasn't that great.

I'm happy that oscar has pretty much gone with a limited rotation in conference play, especially with DJamer playing over 70% of the time. Sneed, Ervin, and Maurice will get their spots to rotate in, but for the most part I think this rotation works.

one thing i like about our lack of depth this year is that it doesn't give oscar a chance to screw things up. i mean, when our only rotation critiques are whether maurice or sneed should play 3 mins more a game, i'm fairly content.

We only have a lack of depth at the forward/center position, and the more Isaiah plays decently the less of an issue this is.

Stokes and Brown both play more minutes than Jacob Pullen did at any point in his career. Not saying you're wrong about our backcourt depth, but it certainly implies we don't take full advantage of our depth.

I don't think we take full advantage of our depth but I understand, the man is trying to keep his job. Developing depth is for secure coaches.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #70 on: January 23, 2017, 07:02:50 PM »
In general, I would like to see Sneed play more, but I saw nothing that warranted more minutes on Saturday. Other guys were playing well and especially in the first half he wasn't that great.

I'm happy that oscar has pretty much gone with a limited rotation in conference play, especially with DJamer playing over 70% of the time. Sneed, Ervin, and Maurice will get their spots to rotate in, but for the most part I think this rotation works.

one thing i like about our lack of depth this year is that it doesn't give oscar a chance to screw things up. i mean, when our only rotation critiques are whether maurice or sneed should play 3 mins more a game, i'm fairly content.

We only have a lack of depth at the forward/center position, and the more Isaiah plays decently the less of an issue this is.

Stokes and Brown both play more minutes than Jacob Pullen did at any point in his career. Not saying you're wrong about our backcourt depth, but it certainly implies we don't take full advantage of our depth.

I don't think we take full advantage of our depth but I understand, the man is trying to keep his job. Developing depth is for secure coaches.

Yeah. Although I do think there is a slightly increased risk of injury to those players. I really don't know if fatigue over the course of the season is much of an issue in college for guys like Stokes and Brown, but it seems like it could have an impact.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Stokes-d to Barry Huggs; WVU ADV
« Reply #71 on: January 23, 2017, 07:37:31 PM »
Guys, we don't have a legit option at pg after stokes. It's pretty rough ridin' obvious.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd