MSNBC

[wetwillie]

i don't think it was labeled a debate, it was a forum or something like that

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

This is what it was:

It was a series of one on one interviews. Rachel would ask some long boring leading question, usually about some hypocritical thing the candidate was campaigning on, then the candidate would meander through about 5 platitudes and not answer the question. Rinse repeat. It was exactly what you'd expect from these psychopaths, lots of unfounded claims about nebulous issues.

[K-S-U-Wildcats!]

This is what it was:

It was a series of one on one interviews. Rachel would ask some long boring leading question, usually about some hypocritical thing the candidate was campaigning on, then the candidate would meander through about 5 platitudes and not answer the question. Rinse repeat. It was exactly what you'd expect from these psychopaths, lots of unfounded claims about nebulous issues.

Oh. So exactly what the GOP should do with an intelligent conservative host. But nah, they'd prefer to field loaded questions from liberal moderators too.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

It seemed too stages, even for msnbc