Author Topic: Running game  (Read 2105 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Running game
« on: November 08, 2014, 09:38:38 PM »
Lots of problems tonight, but the total lack of a running game was a killer.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline smith1051

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 270
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2014, 10:10:42 PM »
Or maybe the lack of defense that could stop a run game

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2014, 10:16:56 PM »
Both.

Offline smith1051

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 270
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #3 on: November 08, 2014, 10:17:51 PM »
334

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2014, 10:19:12 PM »
Time of rough ridin' possession.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10181
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2014, 10:19:23 PM »
I guess bad Bill was right about Demarcus. Demarcus sucks. I mean, I thought that before but, he really sucks.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2014, 10:20:19 PM »
Both.

Yes.

Our inability to run the ball destroyed our offense. Put us in 2nd and 3rd and long all night. Made us one dimensional.

Our inability to stop the run progressed as the game went along. Early it was mainly Boykin breaking contain and running for first downs. Then their back got going and they absolutely destroyed us, but that was mainly in the 2nd half.

But it was bad on both sides of the ball which is a major reason why we got thumped tonight.

Offline smith1051

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 270
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #7 on: November 08, 2014, 10:20:50 PM »
Most yards TCU has rushed for this season which includes games against Samford and SMU for fucks sake

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2014, 10:23:09 PM »
Both.

Yes.

Our inability to run the ball destroyed our offense. Put us in 2nd and 3rd and long all night. Made us one dimensional.

Our inability to stop the run progressed as the game went along. Early it was mainly Boykin breaking contain and running for first downs. Then their back got going and they absolutely destroyed us, but that was mainly in the 2nd half.

But it was bad on both sides of the ball which is a major reason why we got thumped tonight.
They played our typical style of offense.  They ruled the T.O.P.  No hurry up tonight.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Running game
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2014, 10:27:31 PM »
I suspect its more an issue of not being to run block effectively than having superbad rbs (not that our rbs are particularly good). Our o-line is not good enough.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #10 on: November 08, 2014, 10:29:19 PM »
I suspect its more an issue of not being to run block effectively than having superbad rbs (not that our rbs are particularly good). Our o-line is not good enough.
They did give Waters the typical 4 to 6 seconds for effective passing time.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Running game
« Reply #11 on: November 08, 2014, 10:30:22 PM »
i think we can pass block OK enough, but not run block.

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2014, 10:30:51 PM »
I suspect its more an issue of not being to run block effectively than having superbad rbs (not that our rbs are particularly good). Our o-line is not good enough.
They did give Waters the typical 4 to 6 seconds for effective passing time.
And he typically wanted 8

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13335
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #13 on: November 08, 2014, 10:38:55 PM »
I suspect its more an issue of not being to run block effectively than having superbad rbs (not that our rbs are particularly good). Our o-line is not good enough.
They did give Waters the typical 4 to 6 seconds for effective passing time.
And he typically wanted 8
Yes, that's the problem.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: Running game
« Reply #14 on: November 08, 2014, 10:39:31 PM »
I agree with everything posted in this thread
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!