Author Topic: Why settle for second...  (Read 2653 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kstatefan11

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 191
    • View Profile
Why settle for second...
« on: February 12, 2014, 10:37:05 AM »
@ Baylor
TCU
@OU
@Tech
ISU
@OSU
Baylor

Obviously, every road game left will be a challenge against good (OU), hungry (Tech), and desperate, underachieving teams (Baylor and OSU). TCU is the only home gimme. But arguably the four toughest games on the schedule are behind us. The Texas loss still hurts, but a better situation at this point couldn’t really be expected. The same could be said for finishing with a 9-game win streak. But 14-4 can still win the confy. Winning the next three would be huge.

Team #2str8. Imagine the kstate0 t-shirts.



(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2014, 10:41:16 AM »
@ Baylor- L
TCU- W
@OU- L
@Tech- W
ISU- W
@OSU- W (nothing left to play for)
Baylor- W
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2014, 10:46:15 AM »
At Tech is going to be harder then at Baylor. Tubby > Drew, Tech's crowd > Baylor's crowd 

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2014, 10:53:35 AM »
I mean, if we win out there is a chance. I don't think we will win out tho.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2014, 10:55:29 AM »
We're going to win out, then lose to KU in the Dr Pepper.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37170
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2014, 10:59:12 AM »
At Tech is going to be harder then at Baylor. Tubby > Drew, Tech's crowd > Baylor's crowd

Baylor has a whole lot more talent than Tech, so that game will be harder.

Offline kstatefan11

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 191
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2014, 11:01:17 AM »
@ Baylor- L
TCU- W
@OU- L
@Tech- W
ISU- W
@OSU- W (nothing left to play for)
Baylor- W

This is probably what will happen. Would still take. 0-4 on the roadies wouldn't be a complete shock, either. 2-2 would be very respectable.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39255
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2014, 11:06:36 AM »
i mean you guys, the only away game KSU has won all season was @ TCU. it's a pretty glaring cold sore / barnacle on the resume

Offline #LIFE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2014, 11:07:53 AM »
i mean you guys, the only away game KSU has won all season was @ TCU. it's a pretty glaring cold sore / barnacle on the resume

Yeah, I like the optimism and all, but I think we will struggle to get a W Saturday

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37170
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2014, 11:10:34 AM »
i mean you guys, the only away game KSU has won all season was @ TCU. it's a pretty glaring cold sore / barnacle on the resume

I think we're due.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2014, 11:14:53 AM »
i mean you guys, the only away game KSU has won all season was @ TCU. it's a pretty glaring cold sore / barnacle on the resume

 :sdeek:

To be fair, losses at KU, UT, ISU, and WV are not exactly bad losses. 2 more wins on the road would likely get us to at least 11-7 in the conference. I'd really like to be the 3 seed in KC.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2014, 11:19:22 AM »
ok, sure, weve lost some road games... but all the teams weve played on the road so far have been our first game against that team aside from WVU. im going to rule WVU out because they were a completely different team when we went to Morgantown.

no doubt were a much better home team because were young, but don't rule out the experience of having beaten a team at home before going on the road to play them. we know we can beat tech, OU, and OSU. plus like, tech and OSU aren't that good. the baylor game is our toughest left because we haven't seen them before. young teams need confidence and this team has all the confidence in the world after beating KU and they'll know they've beaten these teams at home. not losing 4 road games. 3-1, 2-2 at worst.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2014, 11:29:02 AM »
ok, sure, weve lost some road games... but all the teams weve played on the road so far have been our first game against that team aside from WVU. im going to rule WVU out because they were a completely different team when we went to Morgantown.

no doubt were a much better home team because were young, but don't rule out the experience of having beaten a team at home before going on the road to play them. we know we can beat tech, OU, and OSU. plus like, tech and OSU aren't that good. the baylor game is our toughest left because we haven't seen them before. young teams need confidence and this team has all the confidence in the world after beating KU and they'll know they've beaten these teams at home. not losing 4 road games. 3-1, 2-2 at worst.

Great point about seeing a team for the first time. It's also encouraging that we were in 3 of the 4 games.

ISU - Tied with 4:40 left; had the ball down 3 twice in final 1:23
UT - 3 at the buzzer
WV - Down only 1 with 2:10 left

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2014, 11:31:24 AM »
ok, sure, weve lost some road games... but all the teams weve played on the road so far have been our first game against that team aside from WVU. im going to rule WVU out because they were a completely different team when we went to Morgantown.

no doubt were a much better home team because were young, but don't rule out the experience of having beaten a team at home before going on the road to play them. we know we can beat tech, OU, and OSU. plus like, tech and OSU aren't that good. the baylor game is our toughest left because we haven't seen them before. young teams need confidence and this team has all the confidence in the world after beating KU and they'll know they've beaten these teams at home. not losing 4 road games. 3-1, 2-2 at worst.

Great point about seeing a team for the first time. It's also encouraging that we were in 3 of the 4 games.

ISU - Tied with 4:40 left; had the ball down 3 twice in final 1:23
UT - 3 at the buzzer
WV - Down only 1 with 2:10 left :surprised:

man, just imagine if we would of won all 3 of those

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2014, 11:35:18 AM »
yeah, we likely lose @OU and either @BU or @OSU.  Predict 5-2, for 12-6 Conf overall, tied for 3rd in conference, behind KU and OU.   Other relevant teams:

KU:  7-0 (16-2)
OU:  6-1 (13-5)
UT:  4-3 (12-6)
ISU:  6-1 (12-6) 
WVU:  2-4 (9-11)

5 NCAA teams.  WVU and OSU miss the cut. 
 

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53914
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2014, 11:36:27 AM »
i mean you guys, the only away game KSU has won all season was @ TCU. it's a pretty glaring cold sore / barnacle on the resume

We've only played 5 roadies so we're talking about a super tiny sample size and we could have very easily won a couple of them.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27139
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2014, 11:39:05 AM »
Let's beat Baylor, then we can have this discussion

Offline wiley

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2186
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2014, 11:45:10 AM »
Let's beat Baylor, then we can have this discussion

Are we assuming that Southwell is good to go and was just something minor and painful at the time?
it's easy to be emaw when EMAW is at your doorstep - FFF

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #18 on: February 12, 2014, 11:47:19 AM »
Let's beat Baylor, then we can have this discussion

Are we assuming that Southwell is good to go and was just something minor and painful at the time?

Hopefully Omari is drinking a few gallons of water every day this week. His health is vital to our team's success at this point.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #19 on: February 12, 2014, 12:16:48 PM »
I will be at the Baylor game, so we're probably going to lose
emaw

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16078
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #20 on: February 12, 2014, 12:22:21 PM »
2nd?  :bracketmouse:
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #21 on: February 12, 2014, 12:25:35 PM »
Yeah, we're really banged up. We could definitely lose Saturday

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #22 on: February 12, 2014, 12:27:24 PM »
We need some insider info on how banged up we really are.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #23 on: February 12, 2014, 01:06:17 PM »
Yeah, we're really banged up. We could definitely lose Saturday

plus on road, talented opponent, we just had a big win. lot of bad omens going into this game.
emaw

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Why settle for second...
« Reply #24 on: February 12, 2014, 01:31:43 PM »
I will be at the Baylor game, so we're probably going to lose

 :peek:
bears are fast...