Help Me Prep For Tonight's Game!

[MadCat]

I thought the worst part of this would be the guilt from ending the SEC streak, but that pales in comparison from some motherfucking Alabama fan telling me how rough ridin' dumb our gameplan was and how clueless we are as a team.

Dumbass, we beat your team, miracle or not, with players that have nowhere the athletic ability yours have.  That's on the coaches, your holier than thou Saban got shown up.  Shut your rough ridin' mouth and go stuff that huge rough ridin' double chin of yours some more.

Wow you guys need to learn how to TSC better.

I read this and wonder when MU's honeymoon ends.

[Emo EMAW]

Where does Auburn usually rank for recruiting classes?

[The_Wippuh]

Consistently top 10.

2014 so far: #9
2013: #8
2012: #10
2011: #7
2010: #4

[Katpappy]

Consistently top 10.

2014 so far: #9
2013: #8
2012: #10
2011: #7
2010: #4

We're mumped, guys. 

[Emo EMAW]

Consistently top 10.

2014 so far: #9
2013: #8
2012: #10
2011: #7
2010: #4

Tough to say that Bama has much better athletes than you. 

[The_Wippuh]

Tough to say that Bama has much better athletes than you.

Just like there's a huge difference between being in the top 10 and down around 50, there's a big difference between being in the lower top 10 and being at the top of the top 10.  It's the difference between getting kids that are almost guaranteed NFL locks, who will almost always been difference makers at the college level, and getting kids that right on the verge.  It's why The Hat can be a complete idiot when it comes to coaching at LSU, because he has the athletes to cover up his mistakes.

Here's a comparison of Auburn vs Alabama in recruiting during those same years...

2014 so far: #9 (Bama: 1)
2013: #8 (Bama: 1)
2012: #10 (Bama: 1)
2011: #7 (Bama: 1)
2010: #4 (Bama: 5)

2008 and 2009 we were in the lower teens I think, not good classes at all :(

[MadCat]

Tough to say that Bama has much better athletes than you.

Just like there's a huge difference between being in the top 10 and down around 50, there's a big difference between being in the lower top 10 and being at the top of the top 10.  It's the difference between getting kids that are almost guaranteed NFL locks, who will almost always been difference makers at the college level, and getting kids that right on the verge.  It's why The Hat can be a complete idiot when it comes to coaching at LSU, because he has the athletes to cover up his mistakes.

Here's a comparison of Auburn vs Alabama in recruiting during those same years...

2014 so far: #9 (Bama: 1)
2013: #8 (Bama: 1)
2012: #10 (Bama: 1)
2011: #7 (Bama: 1)
2010: #4 (Bama: 5)

2008 and 2009 we were in the lower teens I think, not good classes at all :(

I can't count the number of drifters I would kill to have a recruiting class ranked in the lower teens.

[Katpappy]

Tough to say that Bama has much better athletes than you.

Just like there's a huge difference between being in the top 10 and down around 50, there's a big difference between being in the lower top 10 and being at the top of the top 10.  It's the difference between getting kids that are almost guaranteed NFL locks, who will almost always been difference makers at the college level, and getting kids that right on the verge.  It's why The Hat can be a complete idiot when it comes to coaching at LSU, because he has the athletes to cover up his mistakes.

Here's a comparison of Auburn vs Alabama in recruiting during those same years...

2014 so far: #9 (Bama: 1)
2013: #8 (Bama: 1)
2012: #10 (Bama: 1)
2011: #7 (Bama: 1)
2010: #4 (Bama: 5)

2008 and 2009 we were in the lower teens I think, not good classes at all :(

I can't count the number of drifters I would kill to have a recruiting class ranked in the lower teens.

Pete's sock ousted.