Who is the second most partisan pit'r?

[sonofdaxjones]

So Weird. 

[michigancat]

Michcat= Jamar (triple pump missed lay ups)
Mir= Luis colon (no skills, just wants to hack at people)
Lib7= Fred Brown ( takes too many ill advised shots)

I wanted to be Freddy Brown.

[Ptolemy]

You think intellectually consistent and partisan are the same thing?

No. I'm intellectually consistent on political matters. Partisan depends on the branch of the party one is adherent to.

[catastrophe]

Typically when someone jumps through hoops to support the ideologies of one party's candidates and/or decry the ideologies of another party's candidates, I consider that person to be pretty partisan.

[sonofdaxjones]

Typically when someone jumps through hoops to support the ideologies of one party's candidates and/or decry the ideologies of another party's candidates, I consider that person to be pretty partisan.

So, basically you just described lib.

[MakeItRain]

Do a starting five with a sixth man for each team complete with role players 

KK, MIR, Michigancat, Lib are the liberals for me. Not sure about a 5th.

LOL, you; fool.

[MakeItRain]

Mir= Luis colon (no skills, just wants to hack at people)

ironic

[chuckjames]

Do a starting five with a sixth man for each team complete with role players 

KK, MIR, Michigancat, Lib are the liberals for me. Not sure about a 5th.

LOL, you; fool.

Oops I meant it has a compliment. Like I usually try to read everything you guys post. My bad.

[MakeItRain]

You think intellectually consistent and partisan are the same thing?

No. I'm intellectually consistent on political matters. Partisan depends on the branch of the party one is adherent to.

Yeah, when I hear "I'm intellectually consistent on political matters," I hear "I believe exactly what the republican party tells me to believe." First of all "intellectually consistent" is utter bullshit that doesn't mean anything. Consistent with what? Are you saying that you take the intellectual stance on everything and the stance opposite of yours lacks intellect and nuance? Secondly if you are consistent with any track of thought, that is exactly partisan.

[catastrophe]

Yea, "intellectually consistent" just sounds like "prejudicial and closed minded" to me.

[MakeItRain]

Typically when someone jumps through hoops to support the ideologies of one party's candidates and/or decry the ideologies of another party's candidates, I consider that person to be pretty partisan.

YEP

Typically when someone jumps through hoops to support the ideologies of one party's candidates and/or decry the ideologies of another party's candidates, I consider that person to be pretty partisan.

So, basically you just described lib.

Yep, and you and KSUW, and the parade of socks like FSD and ptolmey. The difference is that I don't think lib7 denies that he is a partisan. I'll wear the partisan label but I regularly take a hatchet to Obama, Obamacare, Hillary, Biden, and drug legalization. Occasionally calling Donald Trump a name does not absolve you from being partisan.

[MakeItRain]

Do a starting five with a sixth man for each team complete with role players 

KK, MIR, Michigancat, Lib are the liberals for me. Not sure about a 5th.

LOL, you; fool.

Oops I meant it has a compliment. Like I usually try to read everything you guys post. My bad.

Oh I took it as a compliment, it's just you're definitely the fifth in that liberal pentagon. One of the neocons need to start a grotesquely liberal sock. I mean we have plenty of liberals here but none that I would consider an over-the-top liberal stereotype like FSD is for the neocons. We need someone that's like all of the liberals that kind of make us sick. Subaru driving, exclusively nalagene using, cloth diapering, Dr. Broners using, vegan, phony intellectual, constantly correcting, but one who has never spent ten seconds of their lives around people different from themselves. Ugh, I hate that person.

[star seed 7]

cRusty is the closest 

[sonofdaxjones]

Typically when someone jumps through hoops to support the ideologies of one party's candidates and/or decry the ideologies of another party's candidates, I consider that person to be pretty partisan.

YEP

Typically when someone jumps through hoops to support the ideologies of one party's candidates and/or decry the ideologies of another party's candidates, I consider that person to be pretty partisan.

So, basically you just described lib.

Yep, and you and KSUW, and the parade of socks like FSD and ptolmey. The difference is that I don't think lib7 denies that he is a partisan. I'll wear the partisan label but I regularly take a hatchet to Obama, Obamacare, Hillary, Biden, and drug legalization. Occasionally calling Donald Trump a name does not absolve you from being partisan.

Strange I didn't say I wasn't partisan #confused

Yes, and that's all I do, occasionally call Trump a bad name 

[gatoveintisiete]

Do a starting five with a sixth man for each team complete with role players 

KK, MIR, Michigancat, Lib are the liberals for me. Not sure about a 5th.

LOL, you; fool.

Oops I meant it has a compliment. Like I usually try to read everything you guys post. My bad.

Oh I took it as a compliment, it's just you're definitely the fifth in that liberal pentagon. One of the neocons need to start a grotesquely liberal sock. I mean we have plenty of liberals here but none that I would consider an over-the-top liberal stereotype like FSD is for the neocons. We need someone that's like all of the liberals that kind of make us sick. Subaru driving, exclusively nalagene using, cloth diapering, Dr. Broners using, vegan, phony intellectual, constantly correcting, but one who has never spent ten seconds of their lives around people different from themselves. Ugh, I hate that person.

Whether FSD is a sock is irrelevant to me, what's more important is whether you think he is posting what he thinks or parody posting, I don't believe the Michael Beasley of the pit is parody posting  at that notion!