Author Topic: ChUMP Week 14  (Read 1869 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19441
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
ChUMP Week 14
« on: December 01, 2013, 03:16:03 PM »
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
#   Team    Adj Off Eff Off Drives Adj Def Eff  Def Drives  Δ Eff     SOS
1Florida State3.5610.531.10.712.566.52
2Alabama3.3411.351.5311.711.823.61
3Ohio State3.7711.412.1711.411.64.72
4Baylor3.3514.651.814.821.554.55
5Oklahoma State2.7414.061.3413.941.395.42
6Stanford2.8611.411.5611.651.32.22
7Michigan State2.4112.121.1112.411.36.09
8Louisville2.8710.291.611.061.278.06
9Missouri2.9112.061.6612.241.254.27
10Arizona State3.1714.592.0114.241.161.75
11Oregon3.212.062.2212.180.984.05
12BYU2.4214.291.4414.590.981.96
13Auburn2.8713.241.9312.940.942.9
14LSU3.1510.882.2311.180.922.91
15Wisconsin2.3312.821.4312.820.94.01
16South Carolina2.6312.1.7411.650.892.71
17UCF3.10.712.1611.0.845.31
18Fresno State3.2212.822.4214.240.89.36
19Virginia Tech1.9413.1.1812.710.760.97
20Georgia3.412.292.6412.410.760.56
21Northern Illinois2.7812.822.0312.940.758.56
22Duke2.5912.1.912.290.695.29
23Marshall2.8113.182.1613.530.656.82
24Kansas State3.0211.762.4412.120.593.35
25Houston2.1214.061.5513.710.573.48

 :dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year.  Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).

                                                                                                                                                                               
#   Team    Adj Off Eff Off Drives Adj Def Eff  Def Drives  Δ Eff  SOS
4Baylor3.3514.651.814.821.554.55
5Oklahoma State2.7414.061.3413.941.395.42
24Kansas State3.0211.762.4412.120.593.35
34Texas2.3213.182.0113.590.324.24
37Oklahoma2.3412.532.0912.350.255.26
47TCU1.9114.121.8414.410.072.31
71Texas Tech2.1914.762.6914.24-0.53.53
73West Virginia1.7415.652.2715.29-0.533.19
99Kansas1.1814.592.4414.47-1.262.8
106Iowa State1.4714.243.0114.47-1.542.83

Our defense is pretty bad....

If you want a score predicted let me know.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19441
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2013, 03:19:02 PM »
Oh, and SOS runs from 0 to 10, with 10 being the weakest.  LaLa is having a good season and helped us out a lot.

Offline cDubya

  • Coal Grab'r
  • Katpak'r
  • *
  • Posts: 2641
  • KCCO
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2013, 03:27:07 PM »
What's Army/Navy looking like to the ChUMP?

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30579
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2013, 03:35:12 PM »
Big 10 ACC and SEC title game predictos please
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19441
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2013, 03:41:41 PM »
What's Army/Navy looking like to the ChUMP?

Quote from: ChUMP
Army   29
Navy   35

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19441
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2013, 03:49:21 PM »
Big 10 ACC and SEC title game predictos please

Quote from: ChUMP
Michigan State   14
Ohio State   24

Quote from: ChUMP
Duke   8
Florida State   50

Quote from: ChUMP
Missouri   30
Auburn   35

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2013, 06:26:35 PM »
:dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year.  Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).

We went 1-5 in <10 point games, so I can see it.

Pretty good offense and special teams efficiency numbers, defense efficiency numbers weren't terrible.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2013, 06:35:53 PM »
:dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year.  Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).

We went 1-5 in <10 point games, so I can see it.

Pretty good offense and special teams efficiency numbers, defense efficiency numbers weren't terrible.

The Baylor and OSU games would have been 21+ point losses without Sams.  So the 1-5 record is pretty meaningless since he doesn't play QB for this team anymore.  I can't imagine how many sacks Waters would have taken in those games without Thompson and Lockett to throw to.  KU figured out that if you cover Lockett that Waters is nearly worthless, kudos to them.  We're nowhere near a top 25 team.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2013, 06:41:43 PM »
:dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year.  Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).

We went 1-5 in <10 point games, so I can see it.

Pretty good offense and special teams efficiency numbers, defense efficiency numbers weren't terrible.

The Baylor and OSU games would have been 21+ point losses without Sams.  So the 1-5 record is pretty meaningless since he doesn't play QB for this team anymore.  I can't imagine how many sacks Waters would have taken in those games without Thompson and Lockett to throw to.  KU figured out that if you cover Lockett that Waters is nearly worthless, kudos to them.  We're nowhere near a top 25 team.

Yeah, I guess.

I'm simply talking about the season stats and all advanced indicators place this year's offense in the top 20 in college football, if not the top 15.

Defensively its more like top 50, maybe top 40.

Special teams was Top 10.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2013, 07:08:15 PM »
Chings,

OU/OSU

Stanford/Arizona St.

thanks a pantload.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19441
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2013, 08:02:17 PM »
Chings,

OU/OSU

Stanford/Arizona St.

thanks a pantload.

Quote from: ChUMP
Oklahoma   16
Oklahoma State   41

Quote from: ChUMP
Arizona State   31
Stanford   37

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2013, 08:17:03 PM »
Help me understand how Chump has mizzou ranked 4 spots ahead of Auburn, yet as the barners winning 35-30 on a neutral field, plz...
bears are fast...

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39254
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #12 on: December 02, 2013, 10:29:52 AM »
i hate it when people don't understand how that works.


Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39254
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2013, 10:31:00 AM »
also chings, what is La-La's ranking in your system?

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19441
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #14 on: December 02, 2013, 10:39:21 AM »
Help me understand how Chump has mizzou ranked 4 spots ahead of Auburn, yet as the barners winning 35-30 on a neutral field, plz...
1) this is essentially a home game for auburn

2)  this scenario assumes auburn controls the pace

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19441
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #15 on: December 02, 2013, 10:40:11 AM »
also chings, what is La-La's ranking in your system?
Somewhere in the high twenties low thirties I think. I will confirm when I get back to my computer.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #16 on: December 02, 2013, 10:41:24 AM »
Help me understand how Chump has mizzou ranked 4 spots ahead of Auburn, yet as the barners winning 35-30 on a neutral field, plz...
1) this is essentially a home game for auburn

2)  this scenario assumes auburn controls the pace

Thank you, sir...  I appreciate your input.  Also, sending you a PM.
bears are fast...

Offline wiley

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2186
    • View Profile
Re: ChUMP Week 14
« Reply #17 on: December 02, 2013, 10:57:26 AM »
:dunno: ChUMP loves the 'cats, suggests we underachieved/got unlucky this year.  Also indicates that Auburn is probably the "luckiest" team (could also interpret it as Auburn takes advantage of opportunities better than anyone).

We went 1-5 in <10 point games, so I can see it.

Pretty good offense and special teams efficiency numbers, defense efficiency numbers weren't terrible.

The Baylor and OSU games would have been 21+ point losses without Sams.  So the 1-5 record is pretty meaningless since he doesn't play QB for this team anymore.  I can't imagine how many sacks Waters would have taken in those games without Thompson and Lockett to throw to.  KU figured out that if you cover Lockett that Waters is nearly worthless, kudos to them.  We're nowhere near a top 25 team.

I actually thought that the corners for KU were pretty decent, they got physical with lockett which no one has all year.  And they bailed out a safety all day long to help over the top or at least the plays i noticed they isolated lockett with a corner, the safety was sprint back in that direction as the ball was snapped.  We basically got up 21 and our OC's brains went into cruise control, it was infuriating.  Thankfully the tickets were free.

*edit* It was kind of fun to see Hubert have a solid day, was good to see him abuse all big 12 Ben Heeney on multiple occasions.
it's easy to be emaw when EMAW is at your doorstep - FFF