Author Topic: 2004 redux.  (Read 3211 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
2004 redux.
« on: September 15, 2013, 12:27:49 PM »
The Cats are -2 in TO margin after the non-con.

Last time KSU was negative after non-con? 2008.

Last Snyder team? 2004.

:emawkid:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline fun muffin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1594
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2013, 01:57:38 PM »
it won't be if sams starts.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2013, 02:00:05 PM »
2004 team was better than this one imo

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38089
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2013, 02:00:30 PM »
Making the right qb move would resolve this.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2013, 02:26:54 PM »
2004 team was better than this one imo

QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2013, 02:28:25 PM »
2004 team was better than this one imo

QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.

But the rest of the team was better.  Quite a bit better.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2013, 08:45:48 PM »
2004 team was better than this one imo

QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.

But the rest of the team was better.  Quite a bit better.

Uh, no... (see depth charts)

This team isn't a lot better, but that was not a very good team in a terrible Big 12 North

Offline Frankenklein

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1815
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2013, 09:02:40 PM »
2004 team was better than this one imo

QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.

But the rest of the team was better.  Quite a bit better.

Uh, no... (see depth charts)

This team isn't a lot better, but that was not a very good team in a terrible Big 12 North
Jeff Schwinn listed as a key loss at QB  :lol:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2013, 09:05:27 PM »
2004 team was better than this one imo

QB situation was worse, quite a bit worse.

But the rest of the team was better.  Quite a bit better.

Uh, no... (see depth charts)

This team isn't a lot better, but that was not a very good team in a terrible Big 12 North

Fan, it's 2004.  Deal with it.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #9 on: September 21, 2013, 11:30:39 PM »
Bump.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #10 on: September 21, 2013, 11:31:51 PM »
Yeah, I might have to deal with it.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #11 on: September 21, 2013, 11:34:37 PM »
Guys....this is the 2004 A&M game :horrorsurprise:

Think about it, Big 12 opener on the road....we had dumb TO's that resulted in a ten point loss (or around iirc). Lots of yards put up in the air but still the L
« Last Edit: September 21, 2013, 11:43:10 PM by Pett »

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #12 on: September 21, 2013, 11:36:00 PM »
Guys....this is the 2004 A&M game :horrorsurprise:

Think about it, w had dumb TO's that resulted in a ten point loss (or around iirc). Lots of yards put up in the air but still the L

I was thinking the same thing.

Offline ELL3

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 775
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #13 on: September 21, 2013, 11:39:14 PM »
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2013, 11:42:04 PM »
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way

We aren't losing to WVU at home.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32523
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2013, 11:45:27 PM »
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way

We aren't losing to WVU at home.

It would be good for the long term future of the program if we did though.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #16 on: September 21, 2013, 11:48:58 PM »
Until we hike the ball out of the back of th endzone because our punter is standing on the sideline, it is not EXACTLY like 2004.

Offline ELL3

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 775
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #17 on: September 21, 2013, 11:51:45 PM »
Until we hike the ball out of the back of th endzone because our punter is standing on the sideline, it is not EXACTLY like 2004.

That was 2005 at OU, we have that to look forward to next year

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #18 on: September 22, 2013, 12:00:19 AM »
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way
no isu scored like 4 tds in the 4th quarter to ruin Sproles senior day.

We beat mu because  Pinkle hadn't copied Southlak Carroll's offense yet

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #19 on: September 22, 2013, 12:00:44 AM »
as good as Bill was in 2003 he was that bad in 2004, exactly the same, I think we will beat only ISU the rest of the way

We aren't losing to WVU at home.

And I don't think we'll lose to ISU or KU, FWIW. And those wins may not be worth anything in the final bowl analysis...they, alone, won't get us to a bowl.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #20 on: September 22, 2013, 12:03:07 AM »
Until we hike the ball out of the back of th endzone because our punter is standing on the sideline, it is not EXACTLY like 2004.

That was 2005 at OU, we have that to look forward to next year

Goddamnit.  That's right.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: 2004 redux.
« Reply #21 on: September 22, 2013, 05:29:25 AM »
Until we hike the ball out of the back of th endzone because our punter is standing on the sideline, it is not EXACTLY like 2004.
That was 2005 at OU, we have that to look forward to next year

It's 5:29 am, I'm still drunk and this made me lol