Author Topic: So Allen Chapman...  (Read 1997 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45929
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
So Allen Chapman...
« on: November 04, 2012, 10:24:09 PM »
What's the verdict, did he have a good game or not?  On one hand he had three picks and a TD, but if Gundy just kept calling slants for Charlie Moore he would have had 400 yards receiving.  Is this the worst performance for a Big 12 POW ever?


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
« Last Edit: November 05, 2012, 08:08:05 AM by Trim »

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5624
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2012, 10:24:55 PM »
 :curse:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2012, 10:26:34 PM »
good game imo

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45929
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2012, 10:28:46 PM »
How differently would we see it if he hadn't stole Ty's INT?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45929
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2012, 10:35:51 PM »

Offline Bookcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2012, 10:43:09 PM »
Bend Don't Break

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2012, 10:49:25 PM »
What's the verdict, did he have a good game or not?  On one hand he had three picks and a TD, but if Gundy just kept calling slants for Charlie Moore he would have had 400 yards receiving.  Is this the worst performance for a Big 12 POW ever?

Snyder acknowledged your point around 3:15 in the postgame: http://www.kstatesports.com/allaccess/?media=348788

Something about pickles.

Doubt Chapman was spending a lot of time celebrating his POW when they watched the film today.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16989
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2012, 10:51:39 PM »
Turnovers are pretty important.  So are touchdowns.  A lot more important than yards. Chapman def. blows coverage and/ or gets beat more than we would like, but at least yesterday, those picks  :love:.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37959
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2012, 11:08:27 PM »
Any game with more than 1 INT is a pretty good game, imo.

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2012, 01:33:54 AM »
For the sheer impact of what the turnovers did (gave us 6 pts, end zone pick) I'd say good game. But yes he got burned a lot.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59343
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2012, 06:08:46 AM »
It looked like the fighting perpetual peeking into the backfield with a goofy eye Tibesar's out there . . . a lot.


Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40475
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2012, 07:22:59 AM »
I mean, did Rocky "win" the fight against Apollo? No, but he went the distance.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2012, 07:47:12 AM »
he has really good hands
emaw

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: So Alan Chapman...
« Reply #13 on: November 05, 2012, 08:01:41 AM »
You have to take the good with the bad. Chapman made some excellent plays, but after the first INT he seemed overly interested at times in making plays over fitting into the scheme, which leads to mistake in coverage.

To be fair, OSU's passing attack is one of the more complex ones we see and puts more of a bind on the secondary than most other offenses, especially with the threat that Randle is running the ball.

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16209
    • View Profile
Re: So Allen Chapman...
« Reply #14 on: November 05, 2012, 09:34:25 AM »
OT: Brent Musburger just loves himself some Allen Chapman
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: So Allen Chapman...
« Reply #15 on: November 05, 2012, 10:32:05 AM »
OT: Brent Musburger just loves himself some Allen Chapman
Did he ever call him Bubba?

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18047
    • View Profile
Re: So Allen Chapman...
« Reply #16 on: November 05, 2012, 10:43:39 AM »
3 Picks and a TD is far more than he gave up and you're kidding yourself if you say otherwise.  Was definitely a good game but, considering the 3 picks/TD, far from a perfect game.

I also think he might be catching some blame for Zimms worst game this year.