Author Topic: 2004-2010  (Read 4739 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
2004-2010
« on: September 26, 2011, 10:13:51 PM »
our road wins

04: @ mizzou (5-6 3-5)
05: @marshall  (4-7)
06: @cu (2-10 2-6)
07: none
08: @tamu (4-8 2-6)
09: none
10: @kansas (3-9 1-7)

so, the miami win was prolly our best during this decade of despair. very encouraging, and goes to show how rare a road "w" has become since the true DoD left us.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2011, 10:16:58 PM »
07 @Texas is better, but this is a very satisfying W

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2011, 10:19:03 PM »
07 @Texas is better, but this is a very satisfying W

oh boy. sheesh. back to the drawing board fff.

 :cry:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2011, 10:21:50 PM »
07 @Texas is better, but this is a very satisfying W

oh boy. sheesh. back to the drawing board fff.

 :cry:

still love ya bro.  respect.

Offline kst8cat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 375
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2011, 10:24:26 PM »
07 @Texas is better, but this is a very satisfying W

oh boy. sheesh. back to the drawing board fff.

 :cry:

Can I ever trust your stats again, fatty?  Seems you have been totally discredited now.   :embarrassed:

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2011, 10:26:33 PM »
07 @Texas is better, but this is a very satisfying W

oh boy. sheesh. back to the drawing board fff.

 :cry:

Can I ever trust your stats again, fatty?  Seems you have been totally discredited now.   :embarrassed:


seems as though Fatty is a legend and you, well...
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2011, 10:26:54 PM »
07 @Texas is better, but this is a very satisfying W

oh boy. sheesh. back to the drawing board fff.

 :cry:

Can I ever trust your stats again, fatty?  Seems you have been totally discredited now.   :embarrassed:

I don't think you can. I debated posting this, and had to google the majority of the data. Very embarrassing and humbling .

this isn't 2007 anymore, that's for sure.

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2011, 10:28:16 PM »
07 @Texas is better, but this is a very satisfying W

oh boy. sheesh. back to the drawing board fff.

 :cry:

still love ya bro.  respect.

Come on, bro. He deserves better than this.  :nono:
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22791
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2011, 10:32:21 PM »
Aside from the Texas W's and maybe KU '09, the Miami game was probably the biggest win for our program since Dec. 6 2003.

Winning the Baylor game would fit into this category as well, imo.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline kst8cat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 375
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2011, 10:39:18 PM »
He also forgot @ North Texas last year!!!!!!  WTF?!?!  The kid has totally lost his mind.   :shakesfist:

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2011, 10:39:31 PM »
He also forgot @ North Texas last year!!!!!!  WTF?!?!  The kid has totally lost his mind.   :shakesfist:

make it stop.  :cry:

Offline kst8cat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 375
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2011, 10:45:14 PM »
He also forgot @ North Texas last year!!!!!!  WTF?!?!  The kid has totally lost his mind.   :shakesfist:

make it stop.  :cry:

And despite being neutral site games, the two Farmageddons at least deserve a mention.   :peek:

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2011, 10:47:47 PM »
our road wins

04: @ mizzou (5-6 3-5)
05: @marshall  (4-7)
06: @cu (2-10 2-6)
07: none
08: @tamu (4-8 2-6)
09: none
10: @kansas (3-9 1-7)

so, the miami win was prolly our best during this decade of despair. very encouraging, and goes to show how rare a road "w" has become since the true DoD left us.

I am a fan, of this term.

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #13 on: September 27, 2011, 10:09:51 AM »
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline Bookcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #14 on: September 27, 2011, 10:12:49 AM »
road games in which we are a big underdog and their fans are extrememly mean, pompous, and high on drugs...


Miami takes the cake.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #15 on: September 27, 2011, 10:43:49 AM »
07 @Texas is better, but this is a very satisfying W

oh boy. sheesh. back to the drawing board fff.

 :cry:

?

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #16 on: September 27, 2011, 10:46:56 AM »
road games in which we are a big underdog and their fans are extrememly mean, pompous, and high on drugs...


Miami takes the cake.

They gave us the middle finger a lot!

But it was also funny, they'd be all pissed and then the stadium DJamer would turn on some rap and it was like a pacafier to them:  they'd instantly turn nice and start dancing until the music was off, and then they were mean again.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #17 on: September 27, 2011, 10:49:36 AM »
keep your head up fff
emaw

Offline The Manhatter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1100
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2011, 11:42:37 AM »
better win than '07 Texas IMO due to how we won it.  We beat Tejas in '07 because we scored 3 non-offensive TDs and forced 5 or 6 turnovers.  We did neither vs. Miami...beat 'em straight up.

Besides, in '07 Tejas had nobody close to Lamar Miller at RB and had a very young OL.  Miami had 75 starts between the 5 on the OL out there Saturday.  Not only that...they're considered a talented OL.  BTW, they are getting Seantrel Henderson back soon this season.  I'm glad we didn't have to face him.  Last year they avg 500 yards per game when he was in the line up. 

What I found interesting is that in Miami's loss to Temple (where they had 4 starters out from their line up defensively including leaders Forston, Spence, and Armstrong) they only allowed one offensive TD to Terps.  Maryland got 2 TDs defensively and a bunch of FGs.  MD's offense scored much better vs. WVa's defense which is pretty stout.  As for their loss vs. Temple...Temple's not a bad team.  They didn't allow Penn State to take a squat offensively and should have won that one and crushed everybody else with a strong running game and defense.
Academics is a stupid word.

Academic schools are synonymous for being rich, powerful and exclusive, three things Kansas State is not.

So when people throw the word "academics" around, that's really what they are referencing.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59766
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #19 on: September 27, 2011, 12:05:59 PM »
I am here for you FFF.

http://cfbdatawarehouse.com/


Your Forever Friend,

College Football Data Warehouse

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #20 on: September 27, 2011, 12:31:20 PM »
better win than '07 Texas IMO due to how we won it.  We beat Tejas in '07 because we scored 3 non-offensive TDs and forced 5 or 6 turnovers.  We did neither vs. Miami...beat 'em straight up.

Besides, in '07 Tejas had nobody close to Lamar Miller at RB and had a very young OL.  Miami had 75 starts between the 5 on the OL out there Saturday.  Not only that...they're considered a talented OL.  BTW, they are getting Seantrel Henderson back soon this season.  I'm glad we didn't have to face him.  Last year they avg 500 yards per game when he was in the line up. 

What I found interesting is that in Miami's loss to Temple (where they had 4 starters out from their line up defensively including leaders Forston, Spence, and Armstrong) they only allowed one offensive TD to Terps.  Maryland got 2 TDs defensively and a bunch of FGs.  MD's offense scored much better vs. WVa's defense which is pretty stout.  As for their loss vs. Temple...Temple's not a bad team.  They didn't allow Penn State to take a squat offensively and should have won that one and crushed everybody else with a strong running game and defense.

Say what?




Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47984
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #21 on: September 27, 2011, 12:38:27 PM »
^that dude is only a scat back.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline The Manhatter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1100
    • View Profile
Re: 2004-2010
« Reply #22 on: September 27, 2011, 01:59:28 PM »
better win than '07 Texas IMO due to how we won it.  We beat Tejas in '07 because we scored 3 non-offensive TDs and forced 5 or 6 turnovers.  We did neither vs. Miami...beat 'em straight up.

Besides, in '07 Tejas had nobody close to Lamar Miller at RB and had a very young OL.  Miami had 75 starts between the 5 on the OL out there Saturday.  Not only that...they're considered a talented OL.  BTW, they are getting Seantrel Henderson back soon this season.  I'm glad we didn't have to face him.  Last year they avg 500 yards per game when he was in the line up. 

What I found interesting is that in Miami's loss to Temple (where they had 4 starters out from their line up defensively including leaders Forston, Spence, and Armstrong) they only allowed one offensive TD to Terps.  Maryland got 2 TDs defensively and a bunch of FGs.  MD's offense scored much better vs. WVa's defense which is pretty stout.  As for their loss vs. Temple...Temple's not a bad team.  They didn't allow Penn State to take a squat offensively and should have won that one and crushed everybody else with a strong running game and defense.

Say what?





meh, good call but I don't think any NFL GM as of the date we played Texas in '07 would give anything close to a favorable comparison to Charles with that of Lamar Miller of today.  You're operating with the hindsight of Charles' '10 season as a pro and not in early October of '07.  We saw Charles in '06 win as well and nothing about him scared us other than he was a fast, small back who could pop one if he had room.  He didn't scare us going into either '06 or '07 game.....Miller, on the flip side, scares the sh_t out of everyone on the l_l's schedule. 
Academics is a stupid word.

Academic schools are synonymous for being rich, powerful and exclusive, three things Kansas State is not.

So when people throw the word "academics" around, that's really what they are referencing.