« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Author Topic: CU later  (Read 24744 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #100 on: March 10, 2011, 04:53:19 PM »
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 04:45:47 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on March 10, 2011, 04:42:34 PM
not below. just average.

significantly better than average, actually.  probably somewhere around 20-35th best out of 345 or so.

average as far as our elite program bro. :cheers:
Logged

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #101 on: March 10, 2011, 04:53:42 PM »
Match up is not great. Doesn't matter if you don't defend, rebound, or hit shots.
Logged

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #102 on: March 10, 2011, 04:55:41 PM »
Quote from: catzacker on March 10, 2011, 04:53:11 PM
against the "field", 35 is under average.

which is why making the tourney is so satisfying.  it is elite.
Logged
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: CU later
« Reply #103 on: March 10, 2011, 05:04:16 PM »
Quote from: ksu_FAN on March 10, 2011, 04:53:42 PM
Match up is not great. Doesn't matter if you don't defend, rebound, or hit shots.

Kind of glad I didn't get to see this game.

looking at the box score, Burks and Higgins had great games.  Pullen didn't.

Colorado is hard to stop when both Burks and Higgins are on fire.  There's a reason they've done well against top50 teams.  We just seem to be vulnerable to their particular style.

Again, I didn't watch any of this, but making an observation based on watching CU earlier this year.

Maybe this will wake up the team again.  We won six in a row after losing to Colorado last time.  They seem to be our 'come back to Earth' team.
Logged

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #104 on: March 10, 2011, 05:22:35 PM »
the bad match up idea shouldn't be dismissed.  in fact, the numbers for cu/ksu vs. the numbers for the rest of the season indicate that it applies here.  i don't know why that wouldn't be taken into consideration.
Logged

Offline theKSU

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1403
  • Team KSU
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #105 on: March 10, 2011, 05:26:41 PM »
That was the team I least wanted to face.  Thanks _fan. 
Logged

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #106 on: March 10, 2011, 05:35:24 PM »
Quote from: chum1 on March 10, 2011, 05:22:35 PM
the bad match up idea shouldn't be dismissed.  in fact, the numbers for cu/ksu vs. the numbers for the rest of the season indicate that it applies here.  i don't know why that wouldn't be taken into consideration.

Probably denial on my part.

The thing is most teams don't hasn't 2 players who can drive you and score consistently, at least not against our defense. So Burks kills us on penetration in the first half. We counter and put our best defender on him and Jake shuts him down. But then we have no answer for Higgins.

For what its worth, neither did that in the first two games, not like today anyway. Some of that is probably changing up how we defended Knutson, who we handled well.

 
Logged

Offline jr4cy

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #107 on: March 10, 2011, 05:42:50 PM »
Quote from: Haverhill on March 10, 2011, 04:22:02 PM

We choked a lead to CU... you guys flat out LOST.

 :cheers: 
Logged

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #108 on: March 10, 2011, 05:43:25 PM »
Quote from: jr4cy on March 10, 2011, 05:42:50 PM
Quote from: Haverhill on March 10, 2011, 04:22:02 PM

We choked a lead to CU... you guys flat out LOST.

 :cheers: 

oh jfc they're spawning
Logged

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32513
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #109 on: March 10, 2011, 06:08:50 PM »
Frank got bitch slapped by Tad, glad it won't happen again
Logged
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #110 on: March 10, 2011, 06:12:35 PM »
Quote from: wetwillie on March 10, 2011, 06:08:50 PM
Frank got bitch slapped by Tad, glad it won't happen again

30% of kstate's annual losses were due to playing cu, and we're done playing them forever.  which means we just got either 30% or 70% better.
Logged
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #111 on: March 10, 2011, 08:39:48 PM »
Quote from: ksu_FAN on March 10, 2011, 05:35:24 PM
Quote from: chum1 on March 10, 2011, 05:22:35 PM
the bad match up idea shouldn't be dismissed.  in fact, the numbers for cu/ksu vs. the numbers for the rest of the season indicate that it applies here.  i don't know why that wouldn't be taken into consideration.

Probably denial on my part.



Same, I feel really stupid because I said after loss #2 that it appears that Colorado is simply better than us, yet I still fell into the trap.

BTW Trim wouldn't take the nut, he said it would make him unbalanced and would interrupt his chi.
Logged

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #112 on: March 10, 2011, 08:48:03 PM »
Quote from: MakeItRain on March 10, 2011, 08:39:48 PM
BTW Trim wouldn't take the nut, he said it would make him unbalanced and would interrupt his chi.

offer the nut plus a bracelet.
Logged
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #113 on: March 10, 2011, 09:09:18 PM »
team with two guys that can jump up and make shots = bad match up
Logged

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #114 on: March 10, 2011, 09:23:31 PM »
Quote from: sys on March 10, 2011, 08:48:03 PM
Quote from: MakeItRain on March 10, 2011, 08:39:48 PM
BTW Trim wouldn't take the nut, he said it would make him unbalanced and would interrupt his chi.

offer the nut plus a bracelet.

Haven't you bros seen the nut jar?  I could never be as unbalanced as I was dragging that thing around.

But yeah, left-arm bracelet should make everything right.
Logged

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #115 on: March 10, 2011, 09:40:17 PM »
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on March 09, 2011, 06:57:45 PM
Absolutely hate playing teams with three guys that can shoot it, two of which can drive it like all-americans.

 :peek:
Logged
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #116 on: March 13, 2011, 05:41:59 PM »
Haha, cu later, NIT losers.
Logged

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #117 on: March 13, 2011, 05:44:23 PM »
Do the Big 12 proud and win that NIT.
Logged

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: CU later
« Reply #118 on: March 13, 2011, 05:51:40 PM »
:lol:
Logged
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Up
« previous next »