« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*  (Read 1730 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« on: February 28, 2011, 10:32:40 PM »
*I will not call it a rivalry unless UT can consistently beat us...

1st half:
   Pace   PPP   eFG%   TO%   OR%   FTR
KSU   35   0.90   46.4%   20.3%   26.7%   25.0%
Opp   35   0.95   35.5%   14.5%   43.5%   21.1%

2nd half:
   Pace   PPP   eFG%   TO%   OR%   FTR
KSU   33   1.35   63.5%   6.1%   30.8%   53.8%
Opp   33   1.13   40.0%   9.2%   35.3%   60.0%

Game:
   Pace   PPP   eFG%   TO%   OR%   FTR
KSU   68   1.11   54.6%   13.3%   28.6%   38.9%
Opp   68   1.03   37.5%   11.8%   40.0%   38.2%

64.5% eFG% in the 2nd half. 1.35 PPP in the 2nd half. Ridiculous numbers against that defense.

UT whipped us on the boards and we played even on TO% (2nd half only 6.1% though) and FT rate. But outshot them in eFG% by 17%. I would've never guessed we would've done that in Texas.

Cats are good.



(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
Logged

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2011, 10:36:00 PM »
Rodney finally found the range on the road.
Logged

Offline PoetWarrior

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2011, 10:36:46 PM »
We will not let you bring us down.
Logged

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2011, 10:37:07 PM »
Quote from: EMAWzified on February 28, 2011, 10:36:00 PM
Rodney finally found the range on the road.

71.4% eFG% for McGruds tonight. Crazy good.
Logged

Offline CrushNasty

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1000
  • Future Shooter Jones W.C.
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2011, 10:37:52 PM »
Change your sig.

Nice prediction.

Love your number stuff.
Logged

Offline catsdo

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 243
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2011, 10:43:24 PM »
It's so much more fun being good.
Logged

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2011, 10:51:29 PM »
great numbers work yet again.

LOVE the FG%
Logged
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Three Fingers

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 167
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2011, 11:19:43 PM »
I didn't think there was any way we could let them get offensive rebounds like that and still come away with a W.  LBBIQ I guess. 
Logged

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2011, 11:21:02 PM »
Quote from: PoetWarrior on February 28, 2011, 10:36:46 PM
We will not let you bring us down.

gonna need a video for this, if you would kind sir
Logged

Offline Andy

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 872
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2011, 11:38:12 PM »
offensive efficiency still the best indicator for whose best
Logged

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2015
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: Chisholm Trail Game Numbers*
« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2011, 11:50:07 PM »
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 28, 2011, 10:37:07 PM
Quote from: EMAWzified on February 28, 2011, 10:36:00 PM
Rodney finally found the range on the road.

71.4% eFG% for McGruds tonight. Crazy good.

Jesus.  Never would have guessed after the early airballs.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »