austin squawk tricks martin

[sys]

forces him to admit how much ncaa restrictions on forcing players the eff out piss him the eff off.


http://cjonline.com/sports/2011-07-18/sports-classroom-stats-tough-track#.TiVFdWGvak0

[steve dave]

this is a very high quality piece for a towny paper.  squawkstin beak is a very good journalist....FOR A SQUAWK!

[sonofdaxjones]

Why would the A.Q. Miller alumni publication write a feature article on someone that is so clearly a squawk? 

[steve dave]

Why would the A.Q. Miller alumni publication write a feature article on someone that is so clearly a squawk? 

to be fair, it was just a "where are they now" alumni blurb.  he didn't get the 14 page pictoral like D.Scott.

[pissclams]

In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.



Squawkstin Beak does get very philosophical in the article.  i bet he was wearing his mortar board and glasses when he wrote the piece.

[wetwillie]

“I was a transfer student, and I worked out pretty good,” K-State basketball coach Frank Martin said. “Why do we punish (coaches) because people transfer? I don’t understand.

“The reason it got put in was to prevent coaches from running players off. To a certain extent, now the players hold the coaches hostage. So if they don’t do what they’re supposed to do, you can’t run them off or else you pay a price.”

have to wade through some pretty hardcore DNR type material to get to this nugget.

[steve dave]

In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.

I think consideration is one of the three requirements for a valid contract (at least in the US).   May need studyingforthebarcat's or currentlyonthebeachcat's or ownsaponycat's input here though.  

[pissclams]

In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.

I think consideration is one of the three requirements for a valid contract (at least in the US).   May need studyingforthebarcat's or currentlyonthebeachcat's or ownsaponycat's input here though. 

hmm, after a little research on yours truly's part it turns out you're right.  sounds like i'm a complete dumbass.   

[austin_meek]

In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.

I think consideration is one of the three requirements for a valid contract (at least in the US).   May need studyingforthebarcat's or currentlyonthebeachcat's or ownsaponycat's input here though.  

One of many life lessons imparted to me by Bob Krause.

[steve dave]

In a valid contract, both sides receive something of value.

hmm.  this isn't always the case.   there are a lot of contracts that don't deal with any exchange of goods or services.  looks like squawkstin should have paid better attention in his business law class.

I think consideration is one of the three requirements for a valid contract (at least in the US).   May need studyingforthebarcat's or currentlyonthebeachcat's or ownsaponycat's input here though.  

One of many life lessons imparted to me by Bob Krause.

You couldn't have picked a better mentor when it comes to contract law

[sonofdaxjones]

From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.

[steve dave]

From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.

that is actually a pretty great idea for bar napkins

[slucat]

From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.

that is actually a pretty great idea for bar napkins

[Kat Kid]

From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.

that is actually a pretty great idea for bar napkins

When you open your elite MHK brew pub "Assemblée" I will keep bar, run trivia, karaoke, and pictionary while serving every drink on those napkins.  Now go to culinary school.

[pissclams]

aaron mccargo junior didn't go to culinary school, he's the next food network star.  thoughts?

[Kat Kid]

aaron mccargo junior didn't go to culinary school, he's the next food network star.  thoughts?

Sometimes everything isn't about you clams.  Sometimes others need to follow their dreams.  Sometimes it takes some PI'ing to get it done.  You can work Monday's and Morning shifts.

[Dugout DickStone]

From what I understand Bob Krause literally has pre-printed contract napkins with 2 large "X" at the bottom.

that is actually a pretty great idea for bar napkins

When you open your elite MHK brew pub "Assemblée" I will keep bar, run trivia, karaoke, and pictionary while serving every drink on those napkins.  Now go to culinary school.

Trim and I know a great trivia guy, not available mondays.

[jtksu]

Schollies are only for one year anyway, right?

[Clevey 2 Times]

Schollies are only for one year anyway, right?

Yes, they are 1 year renewable, but I'm thinking the NCAA frowns on the consistent running off of your players. As in, there may be sanctions for doing that. Anyone?

[steve dave]

Schollies are only for one year anyway, right?

Yes, they are 1 year renewable, but I'm thinking the NCAA frowns on the consistent running off of your players. As in, there may be sanctions for doing that. Anyone?

no (unless they have bad grades as the squawkstin beak piece points out)

[pissclams]

Schollies are only for one year anyway, right?

Yes, they are 1 year renewable, but I'm thinking the NCAA frowns on the consistent running off of your players. As in, there may be sanctions for doing that. Anyone?

a school's academic progress rate can be effected