Author Topic: New House Majority Whip  (Read 5666 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45949
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #25 on: January 03, 2015, 10:02:11 AM »
Who the eff cares about Robert Byrd? Literally every single time a republican is involved in a race issue they bring up Robert Byrd, as if the world doesn't know that bigoted democrats don't exist. The fact that the sole example used are things done over 50 years ago by guy who, if still alive today, would be 97 years old; is pathetic. The media wasn't hard on him because they weren't alive when he was overtly racist.

Instead of posting a decade old link about things that happened over a half a century ago, wouldn't it be easier top just say Scalise made a mistake and just move on? We've moved on to a really old really dead guy and weirdly enough Rachel Maddow. Besides if this dude has to resign his position it won't be the fault of the lib media or Democrats in congress, it will be Boehner.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20668
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #26 on: January 03, 2015, 10:46:50 AM »
Man what a boss this scalise.  Republican/minority issues?  DGAF

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #27 on: January 03, 2015, 12:11:30 PM »
Who the eff cares about Robert Byrd? Literally every single time a republican is involved in a race issue they bring up Robert Byrd, as if the world doesn't know that bigoted democrats don't exist. The fact that the sole example used are things done over 50 years ago by guy who, if still alive today, would be 97 years old; is pathetic. The media wasn't hard on him because they weren't alive when he was overtly racist.

Instead of posting a decade old link about things that happened over a half a century ago, wouldn't it be easier top just say Scalise made a mistake and just move on? We've moved on to a really old really dead guy and weirdly enough Rachel Maddow. Besides if this dude has to resign his position it won't be the fault of the lib media or Democrats in congress, it will be Boehner.

Except that it appears the only mistake Scalise made was to admit attending an event over a decade ago that it turns out he probably didn't attend.

And I don't bring up Byrd to justify bad behavior but to demonstrate media bias. If you're really going to deny that, I'll be happy to provide other examples. Hint: don't deny it.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #28 on: January 03, 2015, 12:18:59 PM »
LOL @ MIR
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67581
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #29 on: January 03, 2015, 10:03:18 PM »
Quote from: david duke
“Scalise would communicate a lot with my campaign manager, Kenny Knight,” Duke told the Post. “That is why he was invited and why he would come. Kenny knew Scalise, Scalise knew Kenny. They were friendly.”

Scalise was invited because he a sharp and up-and-coming legislator who had a reputation of giving good talks about state politics, Duke said, adding that he didn’t know Scalise personally. But Duke did say that Scalise—via their mutual friend Kenny Knight—knew about Duke’s activities.

“All I know is that Kenny liked him. He thought Scalise, who remember was just a state representative, was sharp. They’d talk about the Hollywood system, about the war, whatever I was concerned about,” Duke said. “I think Scalise would talk to Kenny because he recognized how popular I was in his own district. He knew that knowing what I was doing and saying wouldn’t be the worst thing politically. Kenny would keep Scalise up to date on my issues.”

racists absolutely love this scalise guy
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59845
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #30 on: January 04, 2015, 02:38:54 PM »
Sole example?  LOL.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38032
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #31 on: January 04, 2015, 08:57:27 PM »
Who the eff cares about Robert Byrd? Literally every single time a republican is involved in a race issue they bring up Robert Byrd, as if the world doesn't know that bigoted democrats don't exist. The fact that the sole example used are things done over 50 years ago by guy who, if still alive today, would be 97 years old; is pathetic. The media wasn't hard on him because they weren't alive when he was overtly racist.

Instead of posting a decade old link about things that happened over a half a century ago, wouldn't it be easier top just say Scalise made a mistake and just move on? We've moved on to a really old really dead guy and weirdly enough Rachel Maddow. Besides if this dude has to resign his position it won't be the fault of the lib media or Democrats in congress, it will be Boehner.

Except that it appears the only mistake Scalise made was to admit attending an event over a decade ago that it turns out he probably didn't attend.

And I don't bring up Byrd to justify bad behavior but to demonstrate media bias. If you're really going to deny that, I'll be happy to provide other examples. Hint: don't deny it.

If he didn't speak at the event, then why was he regretful?

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #32 on: January 04, 2015, 09:23:26 PM »
Who the eff cares about Robert Byrd? Literally every single time a republican is involved in a race issue they bring up Robert Byrd, as if the world doesn't know that bigoted democrats don't exist. The fact that the sole example used are things done over 50 years ago by guy who, if still alive today, would be 97 years old; is pathetic. The media wasn't hard on him because they weren't alive when he was overtly racist.

Instead of posting a decade old link about things that happened over a half a century ago, wouldn't it be easier top just say Scalise made a mistake and just move on? We've moved on to a really old really dead guy and weirdly enough Rachel Maddow. Besides if this dude has to resign his position it won't be the fault of the lib media or Democrats in congress, it will be Boehner.

Except that it appears the only mistake Scalise made was to admit attending an event over a decade ago that it turns out he probably didn't attend.

And I don't bring up Byrd to justify bad behavior but to demonstrate media bias. If you're really going to deny that, I'll be happy to provide other examples. Hint: don't deny it.

If he didn't speak at the event, then why was he regretful?
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #33 on: January 04, 2015, 11:05:38 PM »
What the eff is a whip anyways?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67581
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #34 on: January 04, 2015, 11:14:10 PM »
Watch house of cards
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45949
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #35 on: January 04, 2015, 11:57:40 PM »
Who the eff cares about Robert Byrd? Literally every single time a republican is involved in a race issue they bring up Robert Byrd, as if the world doesn't know that bigoted democrats don't exist. The fact that the sole example used are things done over 50 years ago by guy who, if still alive today, would be 97 years old; is pathetic. The media wasn't hard on him because they weren't alive when he was overtly racist.

Instead of posting a decade old link about things that happened over a half a century ago, wouldn't it be easier top just say Scalise made a mistake and just move on? We've moved on to a really old really dead guy and weirdly enough Rachel Maddow. Besides if this dude has to resign his position it won't be the fault of the lib media or Democrats in congress, it will be Boehner.

Except that it appears the only mistake Scalise made was to admit attending an event over a decade ago that it turns out he probably didn't attend.

And I don't bring up Byrd to justify bad behavior but to demonstrate media bias. If you're really going to deny that, I'll be happy to provide other examples. Hint: don't deny it.

I illustrated why your claims of media bias are ridiculous. Robert Byrd was in the Klan before people owned televisions. I guarantee you that more people know Robert Byrd was in the Klan than even know who this guy is. I watch and read lots of news everyday and the only two places I've seen this story at is here and the Crooks and Liars Twitter feed. It's pretty clear that the msm gives no fucks about this story.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38032
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #36 on: January 05, 2015, 12:27:05 AM »
Who the eff cares about Robert Byrd? Literally every single time a republican is involved in a race issue they bring up Robert Byrd, as if the world doesn't know that bigoted democrats don't exist. The fact that the sole example used are things done over 50 years ago by guy who, if still alive today, would be 97 years old; is pathetic. The media wasn't hard on him because they weren't alive when he was overtly racist.

Instead of posting a decade old link about things that happened over a half a century ago, wouldn't it be easier top just say Scalise made a mistake and just move on? We've moved on to a really old really dead guy and weirdly enough Rachel Maddow. Besides if this dude has to resign his position it won't be the fault of the lib media or Democrats in congress, it will be Boehner.

Except that it appears the only mistake Scalise made was to admit attending an event over a decade ago that it turns out he probably didn't attend.

And I don't bring up Byrd to justify bad behavior but to demonstrate media bias. If you're really going to deny that, I'll be happy to provide other examples. Hint: don't deny it.

If he didn't speak at the event, then why was he regretful?

Maybe he just remembers speaking at a different hate group's convention and got confused. Why would he regret something he didn't do?

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #37 on: January 05, 2015, 08:40:50 AM »
Who the eff cares about Robert Byrd? Literally every single time a republican is involved in a race issue they bring up Robert Byrd, as if the world doesn't know that bigoted democrats don't exist. The fact that the sole example used are things done over 50 years ago by guy who, if still alive today, would be 97 years old; is pathetic. The media wasn't hard on him because they weren't alive when he was overtly racist.

Instead of posting a decade old link about things that happened over a half a century ago, wouldn't it be easier top just say Scalise made a mistake and just move on? We've moved on to a really old really dead guy and weirdly enough Rachel Maddow. Besides if this dude has to resign his position it won't be the fault of the lib media or Democrats in congress, it will be Boehner.

Except that it appears the only mistake Scalise made was to admit attending an event over a decade ago that it turns out he probably didn't attend.

And I don't bring up Byrd to justify bad behavior but to demonstrate media bias. If you're really going to deny that, I'll be happy to provide other examples. Hint: don't deny it.

If he didn't speak at the event, then why was he regretful?

Maybe he just remembers speaking at a different hate group's convention and got confused. Why would he regret something he didn't do?

Because he issued a quick statement in the hopes of putting a lid on it, and didn't figure out from his records that he actually spoke to a different group earlier in the day in the same room? This happened over a decade ago.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38032
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #38 on: January 05, 2015, 08:48:44 AM »
Who the eff cares about Robert Byrd? Literally every single time a republican is involved in a race issue they bring up Robert Byrd, as if the world doesn't know that bigoted democrats don't exist. The fact that the sole example used are things done over 50 years ago by guy who, if still alive today, would be 97 years old; is pathetic. The media wasn't hard on him because they weren't alive when he was overtly racist.

Instead of posting a decade old link about things that happened over a half a century ago, wouldn't it be easier top just say Scalise made a mistake and just move on? We've moved on to a really old really dead guy and weirdly enough Rachel Maddow. Besides if this dude has to resign his position it won't be the fault of the lib media or Democrats in congress, it will be Boehner.

Except that it appears the only mistake Scalise made was to admit attending an event over a decade ago that it turns out he probably didn't attend.

And I don't bring up Byrd to justify bad behavior but to demonstrate media bias. If you're really going to deny that, I'll be happy to provide other examples. Hint: don't deny it.

If he didn't speak at the event, then why was he regretful?

Maybe he just remembers speaking at a different hate group's convention and got confused. Why would he regret something he didn't do?

Because he issued a quick statement in the hopes of putting a lid on it, and didn't figure out from his records that he actually spoke to a different group earlier in the day in the same room? This happened over a decade ago.

That doesn't make much sense. Does he just speak at so many hate group conventions that he can't keep them straight? If I spoke at a KKK meeting 10 years ago, I think that I would remember that today.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #39 on: January 05, 2015, 09:18:00 AM »
Who the eff cares about Robert Byrd? Literally every single time a republican is involved in a race issue they bring up Robert Byrd, as if the world doesn't know that bigoted democrats don't exist. The fact that the sole example used are things done over 50 years ago by guy who, if still alive today, would be 97 years old; is pathetic. The media wasn't hard on him because they weren't alive when he was overtly racist.

Instead of posting a decade old link about things that happened over a half a century ago, wouldn't it be easier top just say Scalise made a mistake and just move on? We've moved on to a really old really dead guy and weirdly enough Rachel Maddow. Besides if this dude has to resign his position it won't be the fault of the lib media or Democrats in congress, it will be Boehner.

Except that it appears the only mistake Scalise made was to admit attending an event over a decade ago that it turns out he probably didn't attend.

And I don't bring up Byrd to justify bad behavior but to demonstrate media bias. If you're really going to deny that, I'll be happy to provide other examples. Hint: don't deny it.

If he didn't speak at the event, then why was he regretful?

Maybe he just remembers speaking at a different hate group's convention and got confused. Why would he regret something he didn't do?

Because he issued a quick statement in the hopes of putting a lid on it, and didn't figure out from his records that he actually spoke to a different group earlier in the day in the same room? This happened over a decade ago.

That doesn't make much sense. Does he just speak at so many hate group conventions that he can't keep them straight? If I spoke at a KKK meeting 10 years ago, I think that I would remember that today.

That's kind of my point. This is an obscure group that he probably didn't even speak to, over a decade ago. Hence the fuzzy memory. This whole discussion is idiotic.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67581
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #40 on: January 05, 2015, 09:30:03 AM »
He's in constant contact with the groups organizer, but has never heard of it. Right...  :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #41 on: January 05, 2015, 10:19:15 AM »
The whip's Jeremiah wright/Bill ayers moment. Will he survive???? We'll see how it plays out on goE and report back.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd


Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19149
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
:adios:

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #44 on: January 19, 2015, 11:04:00 AM »
My company is based in Germany. I am working today.


Gonna win 'em all!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88741
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #45 on: January 19, 2015, 12:49:19 PM »
My company is based in Switzerland. I am working today.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #46 on: January 19, 2015, 02:28:14 PM »
Is the implication that everyone who didn't vote in favor of making today a Federal Holiday did so because racism. Cuz, that's tarded.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #47 on: January 19, 2015, 09:30:14 PM »
My company is not racist, I was off today.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19149
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: New House Majority Whip
« Reply #48 on: January 20, 2015, 11:42:49 AM »
My company is based in Switzerland. I am working today.
It's been an interesting couple of weeks for them I would imagine
:adios:

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29373
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile