Author Topic: 2014 v. 2012  (Read 3323 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Steffy08

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1292
    • View Profile
2014 v. 2012
« on: October 12, 2014, 08:52:28 PM »
Trying to believe we can win in Norman again.  A couple tidbits that gave me a little hope:

In 2012, we were leading Missouri State 16-9 in the 4th.
The week before we beat OU in 2012, we were ahead of North Texas 14-13 in the third, and only won 35-21.

Between those two games, of course, was a dismantling of Miami.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2014, 11:22:02 PM »
Game is going to be a dog fight of course we are going to have a chance.

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2014, 11:38:45 PM »
Lol we're winning by double digits  :buh-bye:

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2014, 12:25:39 AM »
ou rough ridin' sucked in 2012 and they still should have beat us

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10189
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2014, 01:08:56 AM »
ou rough ridin' sucked in 2012 and they still should have beat us

Ya, the 2012 k-state team sucked....  :facepalm:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88689
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2014, 06:06:38 AM »

Trying to believe we can win in Norman again.  A couple tidbits that gave me a little hope:

In 2012, we were leading Missouri State 16-9 in the 4th.
The week before we beat OU in 2012, we were ahead of North Texas 14-13 in the third, and only won 35-21.

Between those two games, of course, was a dismantling of Miami.

Both of those teams were better than this year's ISU team though

Offline Steffy08

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1292
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2014, 08:05:21 AM »

Trying to believe we can win in Norman again.  A couple tidbits that gave me a little hope:

In 2012, we were leading Missouri State 16-9 in the 4th.
The week before we beat OU in 2012, we were ahead of North Texas 14-13 in the third, and only won 35-21.

Between those two games, of course, was a dismantling of Miami.

Both of those teams were better than this year's ISU team though

No, 2014 ISU favored by 10+ v. 2012 North Texas or 2012 Missouri State.

Offline cas4ksu

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2463
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2014, 08:09:07 AM »
I'm sure that ISU would have lost on an erroneous call anyway, so what's it really matter?

Offline meow meow

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11399
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2014, 08:52:18 AM »
Some really interesting "tidbits" here by Steffy, I just don't know how to wrap my head around all of this new data.

Offline Steffy08

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1292
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2014, 09:15:02 AM »
Some really interesting "tidbits" here by Steffy, I just don't know how to wrap my head around all of this new data.

"Tidbits" might have been too strong of a word; got ya.  I'm just hoping we haven't seen our best football yet is what I am saying.

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29372
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #10 on: October 13, 2014, 09:16:42 AM »
i hope we haven't either :sdeek:

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40576
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #11 on: October 13, 2014, 10:18:32 AM »
we were much, much better in 2012

Offline sunny_cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14367
  • eff off
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #12 on: October 13, 2014, 10:19:16 AM »
we were much, much better in 2012

yeah but you don't have to say it :frown:

Offline Bookcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #13 on: October 13, 2014, 04:05:41 PM »
ou rough ridin' sucked in 2012 and they still should have beat us

The same OU team that beat Baylor the week before we got buzz bombed....

OU was good in '12. Not National Title caliber good..but good, and they hardly ever ever lose at home..........and Snyder unleashed the hounds late in that game... Kstate marched down the field in that 4th quarter TWICE...in stunned OU fan bewilderment.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2014, 04:33:44 PM »
ou rough ridin' sucked in 2012 and they still should have beat us

The same OU team that beat Baylor the week before we got buzz bombed....

OU was good in '12. Not National Title caliber good..but good, and they hardly ever ever lose at home..........and Snyder unleashed the hounds late in that game... Kstate marched down the field in that 4th quarter TWICE...in stunned OU fan bewilderment.

Mike has always has struggled against air raid concepts. I hope we can keep it close before we spread it out on them during the 2nd half. 

Offline Bookcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #15 on: October 13, 2014, 04:45:41 PM »
Mikey is so spoiled....that their blue chippers make up for his lack of x's and o's. He'd be a liability at almost any other school..and there is direct evidence that his presence on their staff has directly resulted in their lack of any BCS success since Arizona sent him packing. The nepotism is amazing down there.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #16 on: October 13, 2014, 05:19:32 PM »
Mikey is so spoiled....that their blue chippers make up for his lack of x's and o's. He'd be a liability at almost any other school..and there is direct evidence that his presence on their staff has directly resulted in their lack of any BCS success since Arizona sent him packing. The nepotism is amazing down there.
I fell like most Defense coordinators don't understand the spread, hurry up and air raid concepts. 

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18079
    • View Profile
Re: 2014 v. 2012
« Reply #17 on: October 13, 2014, 05:41:33 PM »
Knight if full of potential but young and prone to mistakes.  If we can keep him uncomfortable, we'll be in it.  If we let him get going, we're in trouble.