Author Topic: interesting figure (i assume true)  (Read 6174 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #25 on: September 04, 2013, 12:51:41 AM »
it makes more sense to me too, because there isn't such a dramatic dichotomous, labor wins v capital wins point of separation.

i'd like to better understand the divergence, though.  because axis of % vs numbers?  or a difference in the underlying data (like compensation index is more sophisticated than real compensation and includes some adjustment for purchasing power or something).
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88783
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #26 on: December 21, 2013, 08:04:35 AM »

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20670
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #27 on: December 21, 2013, 08:22:34 AM »
China.  Women entering the work force.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #28 on: December 21, 2013, 12:25:20 PM »
You know what will be good for wages? Tons of newly legalized unskilled labor. I always thought the whole theory of supply and demand was bullshit anyway.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88783
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #29 on: December 21, 2013, 12:54:01 PM »
I thought you were going to say marijuana for a second and I was going to agree with you but then you said the stupid labor thing you said.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #30 on: December 21, 2013, 01:27:45 PM »
You know what will be good for wages? Tons of newly legalized unskilled labor. I always thought the whole theory of supply and demand was bullshit anyway.

i seriously doubt that will be good for wages

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38136
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #31 on: December 21, 2013, 02:28:08 PM »
Marijuana is correct. Saw a story last week stating how the state of Washington is blown away by how much weed its residents smoke and how much more it is than what was thought when pushing legalization through.  They originally thought the state consumed 85 metric tons.  After running a study since legalization, they found that the actual number is more like 167 metric tons.

The article said that the actual number equates to 5-7 joints per resident per week, or something like that.

Lots of tax rev in the legalization idea.

Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #32 on: December 21, 2013, 02:45:56 PM »
How does pot legalization help wages? I guess the theory is that, long term, you're removing more people (lazy potheads) from the workforce, thus reducing supply and boosting wages? While we're at it, let's legalize meth and heroin too. I mean, there can't be any harm to doping up the masses.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38136
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #33 on: December 21, 2013, 02:58:34 PM »
Pot and heroin comparos are dumb. 

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7834
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #34 on: December 21, 2013, 08:43:32 PM »
pot<<<alcohol<<<<<<<<<cigarettes<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<cocain<<<<<<<<<<meth<<<<<<heroin

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #35 on: December 22, 2013, 09:20:57 AM »
Technology is great!   Increased productivity is great!

Correlating marginal tax rates with wage growth is Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #36 on: December 22, 2013, 09:26:58 AM »
FYI, productivity is supposed to outpace wage growth, in a developed/developing economy.

Thanks to michigancat for getting the real graph, instead of the one with giant arrows laid on top of it.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: interesting figure (i assume true)
« Reply #37 on: December 22, 2013, 09:28:33 AM »
I thought you were going to say marijuana for a second and I was going to agree with you but then you said the stupid labor thing you said.

You are a rough ridin' moron.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd