0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting
I thought the aTm player that was tossed got a raw deal. I know they went to a review, but I didn't catch the conclusion, anyone fill me in?
Quote from: ednksu on August 31, 2013, 08:40:17 PMI thought the aTm player that was tossed got a raw deal. I know they went to a review, but I didn't catch the conclusion, anyone fill me in?Seriously?I mean there is absolutely nothing wrong with this being called targeting.
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on August 31, 2013, 09:37:32 PMQuote from: ednksu on August 31, 2013, 08:40:17 PMI thought the aTm player that was tossed got a raw deal. I know they went to a review, but I didn't catch the conclusion, anyone fill me in?Seriously?I mean there is absolutely nothing wrong with this being called targeting.Well that replay makes the hit look better than other views. I guess the kid did get tossed and has to sit the first half of the next game. Other views make it look a lot worse. I think the refs were thinking there was more of a launching component to the rule, but I think the ejection only occurs if the crown is used. could be wrong though.