Author Topic: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?  (Read 2823 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« on: December 02, 2012, 10:16:09 AM »
Haven't heard any gracious rejection of a shared title yet.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2012, 11:30:40 AM »
Haven't heard any gracious rejection of a shared title yet.
I think he is going to succumb to the big 12's rules and share the championship, but only because he has to.

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4210
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2012, 09:22:54 PM »
Haven't heard any gracious rejection of a shared title yet.
I think he is going to succumb to the big 12's rules and share the championship, but only because he has to.

Norman, OK, is the home of shifting standards.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15616
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2012, 09:29:50 PM »
Yeah they are silently accepting the trophy only because of the rules....which also require you to pose on an opponent's field:

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2012, 09:30:59 PM »
Yeah they are silently accepting the trophy only because of the rules....which also require you to pose on an opponent's field:


Best conference champion that didn't qualify for the BCS.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2012, 09:32:16 PM »
Yeah they are silently accepting the trophy only because of the rules....which also require you to pose on an opponent's field:

every one of their arms is being twisted by a conference official...those aren't smiles, just grimaces of pain.

Offline Shacks

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1829
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2012, 09:34:21 PM »
Haven't heard any gracious rejection of a shared title yet.
I think he is going to succumb to the big 12's rules and share the championship, but only because he has to.

Norman, OK, is the home of shifting standards.

This wouldn't be the first time the Dirt Burglars ignored head to head results (2008)

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2012, 09:37:17 PM »
Yeah they are silently accepting the trophy only because of the rules....which also require you to pose on an opponent's field:


Best conference champion that didn't qualify for the BCS.
Champions*

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #8 on: December 02, 2012, 09:38:24 PM »
Damien(that creepy kid on the left with the football) said he would murder all their families if they didn't look happy

Offline bigwillie20

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2772
  • #FYJC #burnitdown
    • View Profile

Offline DOOM_Catz

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 262
  • EMAW said we ain't losin'
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2012, 08:36:56 AM »
Yeah they are silently accepting the trophy only because of the rules....which also require you to pose on an opponent's field:


What kind of weird jazz hands are they throwing up??
“I'm grossly overpaid for what I do." - LHC Bill Snyder, April 17th, 2013

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2012, 08:40:50 AM »
It's their 8th* conference title.

Ubben missed an opportunity to include Stoops quote from last year

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59537
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2012, 08:43:06 AM »
Reports are that it was forced march back out of the dressing room at gun point, guards trained in North Korea were brought in to ensure "happiness". 



Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2012, 08:44:39 AM »
I have no issue with claiming shared titles, its gone on in these cases for years. The issue is Stoops changing his opinion from last year to this year. But really even that isn't a huge deal because coaches say stuff like this and change it later on all the time.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38078
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2012, 08:47:11 AM »
Rumblings that when Bob was asked for an interview to discuss the start difference between his quote last year an the hypocrisy this year, he was too busy laughing and counting bonus money to hear the request for the interview.


Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9939
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2012, 08:52:13 AM »
I think if OU lost in Manhattan rather than Norman, their co-championship would have a little more validity.
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2012, 09:01:54 AM »
I think if OU lost in Manhattan rather than Norman, their co-championship would have a little more validity.

Agreed:

Win the head to head on the road:  sole champions
Win the head to head at home:  shared == Lose the head to head on the road

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: Has Bob officially declined sharing the title?
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2012, 09:03:59 AM »
Rumblings that when Bob was asked for an interview to discuss the start difference between his quote last year an the hypocrisy this year, he was too busy laughing and counting bonus money to hear the request for the interview.

This, Bob does not want the Co-Championship for his players, Bob wants it so he can use the bonus money to put in a pool and not just get a Jelly of the month subscription from OUAD
RIP Fatty