What kind of game would Jamar have had?

[EMAWzified]

His usually no-show torn-a-ment game? Or monster on the offensive glass, get to the line game?

[sys]

he would have been fabulous.  heroic.

[EMAWzified]

So the difference?

[Asteriskhead]

The look on his face at the end of the second half, it damn near brought me to tears. Granted I had been paking my face off, but god damnit I'm going to miss the intensity and emotion he brought.

[sys]

So the difference?

yes, of course.

[kcchiefdav]

'Cuse finally made their run when Gipson finally lost his legs. At the very least, JamSam playing would have put us in the exact same position at that point in the game but Gipson would have had fresher legs.

[kso_FAN]

So the difference?

A big difference. JamSam and JO on the high-low vs the zone would've been fun to watch. JamSam on the 15 footer from the FT line would've been great. And at least 2 or 3 JamSam attacks. Plus a couple JamSam 3s. I'd say we missed out on at least a 13-10 game.

[kim carnes]

So the difference?

A big difference. JamSam and JO on the high-low vs the zone would've been fun to watch. JamSam on the 15 footer from the FT line would've been great. And at least 2 or 3 JamSam attacks. Plus a couple JamSam 3s. I'd say we missed out on at least a 13-10 game.

great, now _fan is trolling.

[Skipper44]

So the difference?

A big difference. JamSam and JO on the high-low vs the zone would've been fun to watch. JamSam on the 15 footer from the FT line would've been great. And at least 2 or 3 JamSam attacks. Plus a couple JamSam 3s. I'd say we missed out on at least a 13-10 game.

Jam defends the rim better than Gip as well.  Currie really stuck it to us today