Author Topic: No meltdown necessary  (Read 5034 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: No meltdown necessary
« Reply #25 on: November 05, 2011, 11:43:14 PM »
On the 5 yard line with 15 seconds and a timeout.  And we threw three times.  :flush:
I do wish we had a TO to allow CK to give it a zone read or spread draw.

We did.

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16748
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: No meltdown necessary
« Reply #26 on: November 05, 2011, 11:43:49 PM »
I'm actually cool with the playcalling.  Passing was working pretty much all day.  Klein threw for over 200 tonight, right?
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: No meltdown necessary
« Reply #27 on: November 05, 2011, 11:45:10 PM »
On the 5 yard line with 15 seconds and a timeout.  And we threw three times.  :flush:
I do wish we had a TO to allow CK to give it a zone read or spread draw.

We did.

Any type of zone or stretch read I wouldn't agree with, too much time. A draw is even sketchy, but not bad on 2nd down after we spiked it. Speed option to the boundry may have been the best call and probably what I would've done.

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: No meltdown necessary
« Reply #28 on: November 05, 2011, 11:46:59 PM »
I'll say this: I am very happy with this year and really pumped up for next year.

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2011
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: No meltdown necessary
« Reply #29 on: November 05, 2011, 11:48:29 PM »
On the 5 yard line with 15 seconds and a timeout.  And we threw three times.  :flush:
I do wish we had a TO to allow CK to give it a zone read or spread draw.

We did.

Any type of zone or stretch read I wouldn't agree with, too much time. A draw is even sketchy, but not bad on 2nd down after we spiked it. Speed option to the boundry may have been the best call and probably what I would've done.

We would have burned 9 seconds at the mesh point with a zone read.

Offline Ira Hayes

  • Created #RayRayForAD
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1985
  • The Marine that went to war.
    • View Profile
Re: No meltdown necessary
« Reply #30 on: November 05, 2011, 11:52:28 PM »
On the 5 yard line with 15 seconds and a timeout.  And we threw three times.  :flush:
I do wish we had a TO to allow CK to give it a zone read or spread draw.

We did.

Any type of zone or stretch read I wouldn't agree with, too much time. A draw is even sketchy, but not bad on 2nd down after we spiked it. Speed option to the boundry may have been the best call and probably what I would've done.

We would have burned 9 seconds at the mesh point with a zone read.

Sure.  We have two running plays or three passes from 5 yards away.  Hell, I think I might call two quarterback sneaks.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: No meltdown necessary
« Reply #31 on: November 05, 2011, 11:58:20 PM »
On the 5 yard line with 15 seconds and a timeout.  And we threw three times.  :flush:
I do wish we had a TO to allow CK to give it a zone read or spread draw.

We did.

Any type of zone or stretch read I wouldn't agree with, too much time. A draw is even sketchy, but not bad on 2nd down after we spiked it. Speed option to the boundry may have been the best call and probably what I would've done.

Straight QB run with Hubert and Farm Boy leading the way (for the 20th time).  You have two shots, pretty good chance of scoring.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: No meltdown necessary
« Reply #32 on: November 06, 2011, 12:02:46 AM »
I would have loved to see  B. Wilson behind the RG/TE or McD/Tana with Hubs or CK.  We were blasting them pretty good.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: No meltdown necessary
« Reply #33 on: November 06, 2011, 12:07:44 AM »
On the 5 yard line with 15 seconds and a timeout.  And we threw three times.  :flush:
I do wish we had a TO to allow CK to give it a zone read or spread draw.

We did.

Any type of zone or stretch read I wouldn't agree with, too much time. A draw is even sketchy, but not bad on 2nd down after we spiked it. Speed option to the boundry may have been the best call and probably what I would've done.

Straight QB run with Hubert and Farm Boy leading the way (for the 20th time).  You have two shots, pretty good chance of scoring.

Yeah, I would agree with that. Especially when we had them spread out.