Author Topic: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011  (Read 10521 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51804
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #50 on: July 14, 2011, 10:07:41 PM »
When all else fails, cling to semantics. 


 :thumbsup:

Poor people tend to use words wrong...like you just did.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #51 on: July 14, 2011, 10:16:01 PM »
When all else fails, cling to semantics.  


 :thumbsup:

Poor people tend to use words wrong...like you just did.



No, I used "semantics" correctly.  They must not teach English/writing at K-State.  No wonder you guys are so poor.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51804
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #52 on: July 14, 2011, 10:20:16 PM »
13-1 has made you dumber.  So desparately poor

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #53 on: July 14, 2011, 10:20:36 PM »
Man, Beems is getting worked like a cheap whore in this thread.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51804
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #54 on: July 14, 2011, 10:24:34 PM »
Idiot



semantics [Gr.,=significant] in general, the study of the relationship between words and meanings. The empirical study of word meanings and sentence meanings in existing languages is a branch of linguistics; the abstract study of meaning in relation to language or symbolic logic systems is a branch of philosophy. Both are called semantics. The field of semantics has three basic concerns: the relations of words to the objects denoted by them, the relations of words to the interpreters of them, and, in symbolic logic, the formal relations of signs to one another (syntax).
In linguistics, semantics has its beginnings in France and Germany in the 1820s when the meanings of words as significant features in the growth of language was recognized. Among the foremost linguistic semanticists of the 20th cent. are Gustaf Stern, Jost Trier, B. L. Whorf, Uriel Weinreich, Stephen Ullmann, Thomas Sebeok, Noam Chomsky, Jerrold Katz, and Charles Osgood. In the linguistics of recent years an offshoot of transformational grammar theory has reemphasized the role of meaning in linguistic analysis. This new theory, developed largely by George Lakoff and James McCawley, is termed generative semantics. In anthropology a new theoretical orientation related to linguistic semantics has been developed. Its leading proponents include W. H. Goodenough, F. G. Lounsbury, and Claude Lévi-Strauss.

In philosophy, semantics has generally followed the lead of symbolic logic, and many philosophers do not make a distinction between logic and semantics. In this context, semantics is concerned with such issues as meaning and truth, meaning and thought, and the relation between signs and what they mean. The leading practitioners have been Gottlob Frege, Lady Welby, Bertrand Russell, Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap, Alonzo Church, Alfred Tarski, C. I. Lewis, Ludwig Wittgenstein, J. L. Austin, W. V. Quine, P. F. Strawson, Steven Schiffer, John Searle, H. P. Grice, Saul Kripke, Donald Davidson, and Gilbert Harman.

Since the publication of the influential The Meaning of Meaning (1925) by C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards, semantics has also become important to literary criticism and stylistics, in which the way that metaphors evoke feelings is investigated and differences between ordinary and literary language are studied. A related discipline, general semantics (so called to distinguish it from semantics in linguistics or philosophy), studies the ways in which meanings of words influence human behavior. General semantics was developed by Alfred Korzybski. The key term in Korzybski's system is evaluation, the mental act that is performed by the hearer when a word is spoken. Among the most prominent followers of Korzybski are Stuart Chase, S. I. Hayakawa, and H. L. Weinberg.

Bibliography

A useful introduction to general semantics is H. L. Weinberg, Levels of Knowing and Existence (1959) and F. R. Palmer, Semantics (1981). For semantics in linguistics, see S. Ullman, Semantics (1962) and The Principles of Semantics (1957, repr. 1967); N. Chomsky, Studies on Semantics in Generative Grammar (1972); G. Leach, Semantics (1974); and J. Lyons, Language, Meaning, and Context (1981). For semantics in philosophy, see R. Carnap, Meaning and Necessity (2d ed. 1956); K. and A. Lehrer, The Theory of Meaning (1970); J. F. Rosenberg and C. Travis, ed., Readings in the Philosophy of Language (1971); and D. Davidson and G. Harman, ed., Semantics of Natural Language (2d ed. 1973). For semantics in literary criticism, see K. Burke, A Rhetoric of Motives (1950) and A Grammar of Motives (1955) and the works of W. Empson and P. Wheelwright.


Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #55 on: July 14, 2011, 10:27:13 PM »
Semantics = the relationship between words and meanings. 


Clinging to semantics = getting caught up on the fact that I wrote "K-State hasn't come close to winning a bowl game or Big 12 North title in almost a decade."


 - "close" being the interpretive term.


There's your lesson for the day, dumbass.


 :flush:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51804
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #56 on: July 14, 2011, 10:30:33 PM »
You have to be joking.  No one is so dumb.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #57 on: July 14, 2011, 10:31:35 PM »
You have to be joking.  No one is so dumb.



It's official.  They don't teach English at K-State.


 :facepalm:

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #58 on: July 14, 2011, 10:33:13 PM »
Quote
Semantics (from Greek s?mantiká, neuter plural of s?mantikós)[1][2]  is the study of meaning. It focuses on the relation between signifiers, such as words, phrases, signs and symbols, and what they stand for, their denotata.

Linguistic semantics is the study of meaning that is used by humans to express themselves through language. Other forms of semantics include the semantics of programming languages, formal logics, and semiotics.

The word "semantics" itself denotes a range of ideas, from the popular to the highly technical. It is often used in ordinary language to denote a problem of understanding that comes down to word selection or connotation. This problem of understanding has been the subject of many formal inquiries, over a long period of time, most notably in the field of formal semantics. In linguistics, it is the study of interpretation of signs or symbols as used by agents or communities within particular circumstances and contexts.[3] Within this view, sounds, facial expressions, body language, proxemics have semantic (meaningful) content, and each has several branches of study. In written language, such things as paragraph structure and punctuation have semantic content; in other forms of language, there is other semantic content.[3]



Go back to school, son. 

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51804
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #59 on: July 14, 2011, 10:35:41 PM »
You have to be joking.  No one is so dumb.



It's official.  They don't teach English at K-State.


 :facepalm:

So you just admit you used the wrong word?  You aren't helping yourself.   No wonder you are poor.

More semantics?

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #60 on: July 14, 2011, 10:37:58 PM »
You have to be joking.  No one is so dumb.



It's official.  They don't teach English at K-State.


 :facepalm:

So you just admit you used the wrong word?  You aren't helping yourself.   No wonder you are poor.

More semantics?



Hey, at least you learned a new word today.  


 :kstategrad:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51804
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #61 on: July 14, 2011, 10:42:00 PM »
Tapout

Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #62 on: July 15, 2011, 08:55:56 AM »
Semantics = the relationship between words and meanings. 


Clinging to semantics = getting caught up on the fact that I wrote "K-State hasn't come close to winning a bowl game or Big 12 North title in almost a decade."


 - "close" being the interpretive term.


There's your lesson for the day, dumbass.


 :flush:

So one game away from winning the North title two years ago does not equal being close in almost a decade?

Which word do you not understand? Close or Decade?

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #63 on: July 15, 2011, 09:48:59 AM »
it's a new area of study in the philosophy of the english language.  hypersemanticbole.   :kstategrad:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36831
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #64 on: July 15, 2011, 10:00:03 AM »
I am not a fan of the U Mad? usage around here, but JFC, this one is marvelous. 


Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16782
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Top 10 dunkers in class of 2011
« Reply #65 on: July 16, 2011, 04:07:14 PM »
using that logic, ku wasn't close to winning the north in '07.