Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
tech is one of the premiere teams in college basketball, we're not. you can't blame that on oscar.
i'll be at least a little surprised if they don't go at least 4-2 over their last six.
Which of the 4 are we most likely to win in your opinion?
In order, likely to least likely.
ISU
UT
BU
@OSU
@TCU
@OU
We shot and scored well against all of them the first time. Most don't particularly care to play defense. 4-2 is very doable.
when the debate turns to whether or not a "play-in" is considered a tournament win, you've already lostIf he would have lost that game, people would have busted his ass and railed on the he doesn't win tournament games train even more. It's a valid point to analyze for non-agendites.
this just isn't true. to me this has nothing to do with oscar. I felt this way before this dork was even our coach. I feel the same about the stupid "second round" thing. "Southern Utah States first ever second round win!" ummmmmm, no.
I hate to agree with meowmeow here but the fact that people that support oscar are arguing this point speaks to the level we have descended to as a program.
It's been said elsewhere, but it sure seems to me like you are actually the one trying to manipulate the facts just so you can say oscar never won a tournament game because you want the guy you dislike to look as bad as possible. I don't GAF about what the NCAA calls it, but a first four game is a postseason/playoff/tournament game. If you win you keep playing and if you don't you're out. What else would you call it?
I'll go a step further and say literally the only people not tallying first four games as tournament wins are people who don't like the school/coach. You can prove me wrong if you ever complained about schools like Southern Utah State getting credited with a tournament win and it WASN'T in the context of criticizing oscar.
TBT, when did you start following cats basketball? And be honest. I think that answer is a huge dividing line for expectations between different cats.
And no M^2, it wasn't just wooly, it was Asbury, and Altman's 1 tourney appearance too. All I've ever known growing up is crap bball teams during my cognitive years of living.
when the debate turns to whether or not a "play-in" is considered a tournament win, you've already lostIf he would have lost that game, people would have busted his ass and railed on the he doesn't win tournament games train even more. It's a valid point to analyze for non-agendites.
I still say he's the worst player in my lifetime that's played as many minutes as he has.
MM fact of the day is a double fact:
Last night was only the 11th time this season, 24 games, MM had more rebounds than fouls. Last night he managed to have rebounds than fouls despite getting no defensive rebounds in 26 minutes. 10th time he's had either 0 or 1 defensive rebounds.
Well, the game is tomorrow not tonight.
Here is the Daniel Green breakdown:
He was supposed to be on the team this entire past year and possibly start. He didn't qualify, no idea what he has been doing in the meantime.
He is now qualified and will join up with the cats sometime soon, however because of playbook stuff and other things, he is going to redshirt this upcoming year also.
Therefore it has been two entire years since he graduated high school and last played football.
I'm happy for Andre. I've always found him to be a well spoken individual, and he has natural feel for the ryhthm of the game.
Surprisingly articulate
Clevey No Mo, cleanup on isle 4.
I think he's saying getting here a year late and then redshirting.https://twitter.com/BrandonHuffman/status/958879634493353986
We'll have to wait quite a bit too see him (redshirting Fall 2018), but this is good news.
It's just like he went to a juco, but not really lol. I don't even know what to say at this point, kid sits out two complete years when supposively he has the best skills at lb on the team.
Two?
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
Probably shouldn’t have passed a law requiring insurance to cover preexisting conditions, huh? Also, insurance premiums were exploding regardless of the individual mandate because not nearly enough young, healthy people were buying insurance, mandate be damned.
And not to quibble, but the primary aim of Obamacare was always expanding Medicaid. It has been marvelously “successful” (at running up massive costs) in that regard.
Democrats rammed this crap bill through, and it’s gonna get worse until they join with Pubs to fix the mess they made. By contrast, Pubs rammed through tax reform, which I suspect is going to be hugely popular.