51
Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: Free throws
« on: November 19, 2010, 03:45:53 PM »
Decent analysis
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Your post implied you didn't know they brought it to within 4. That is all, go back to predicting the future and stuff.They were within 4 with 2 1/2 minutes leftAre we going to cover the spread on Monday?I think we would have still won the game if Presbyterian pulled to within 4.
I know. What is your point?
They were within 4 with 2 1/2 minutes leftAre we going to cover the spread on Monday?I think we would have still won the game if Presbyterian pulled to within 4.
Yeah, but on the offensive end I was impressed with some stuff. Wally, some nice passes etc... But yeah, defense was horrible.Anybody else think we looked just fine to pretty good in the first half? That's why I'm not worried.
We looked terrible in both halves. We shot better in the first half, but we still gave up a ton of wide open threes and layups.
vic looks pretty amazing in pictures. not sure that was what Frank meant to say.I think what he meant by that is that Jake and Curt and Jamar are famous and good for marketing and stuff. Nobody really knows who Ojeleye is, so nobody cares to take pictures of him.
I didn't see the issue in the supermarket magazine aisle after work. Anyone have better luck?Hyvee had em
This is not how you beat a zone. Which is why we're impressed with him. Ball movement is the key to beating a zone and that's what he did. It is very hard to assist to the post at the very beginning of a set. Most post entries come from a wing.He isn't strong enough to dribble penetrate and dish when the defense collapses. This much is obvious. But, I think he did a fine job of handling the ball, distributing, and moving the ball to open flashers/cutters. If Judge, Asprilla, JHR, and Samuels can't hit the broad side of the barn, that's their fault. Had they even made 3-4 of their missed shots in the first half, we shoot +50% instead of 36% and we aren't discussing Sprads' inability to "create shots."
I think he has to dribble penetrate for us to be effective. He didn't really try to.
i don't see how one is any more difficult to read than the other.I read it as 5:1 first and was like
I agree, but this is not what changed my mind. It's NOTI'm ok with front row now. They were regular during sandstorm and less fruity
PI gets to people and has the power to change lives.
That's why it is awesome. Adds a totally new dimensionhttp://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/recap?gameId=303202306
what about JHR gettin down?
JHR dances like a rah-tarded zombie
I'm not saying Jake is/was "fast". I'm saying he looked a little clumsy and slower than normal. I agree about his fantastic ability to be nonchalant, yet effective.I didn't notice, except a couple times he was double teamed he lost control. I think this is due to not being used to all the double teams he's going to have to take this year yet. Especially since this was the first game against players that are able to double effectively this year.
EHBBIQ and scouting types have got to notice that Jake has lost a step. You can't ignore the obvious for too long.