Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Cody Cook not being able to catch passes that hit him between the numbers but being able to make spectacular one-handed catches downfield.
Two amazing drops, two amazing catches. Really an odd game for old C-squared.
So...what's the sinister end-game for scientists and liberals with their "studies" that correlate human activity with global warming? Answers from real climate change deniers only, please.
For scientists it's grant money. For politicians it's control. For "green" businesses it's profit and subsidies.
I'm failing to see how acquisition of grant money and businesses being profitable is sinister. You're going to have to explain the "political control" statement. Are you saying that politicians use the spectre of global warming to fear-monger, and thus extract some additional benefit?
I didn't use the word sinister. But I hope you would agree that skewing data and observations to fit a hypothesis is not good science.
As to your other point, I agree that both sides are susceptible to bias for money - I would posit to you that there is more money flowing from government (generally pro-AGW) than oil companies (generally anti). The point is that we shouldn't deny a legitimate debate exists. That's not science, and it doesn't comport with observed temperature data. (At least, data that's not constantly being "adjusted" by NOAA, NASA, etc.)
"The increase in the amount of heat in the oceans amounts to 17e22 Joules over the last 30 years. That is so much energy it is equivalent to exploding a Hiroshima bomb every second in the ocean for thirty years.Source
So...what's the sinister end-game for scientists and liberals with their "studies" that correlate human activity with global warming? Answers from real climate change deniers only, please.
For scientists it's grant money. For politicians it's control. For "green" businesses it's profit and subsidies.
fan chingon and i were wondering about the following in chat:
waters threw moonshot bombs and huebner throws lazer beam bombs. which is preferable? both are aesthetically pleasing.
I think it depends if you have a Tyler Lockett. I think moon shots would be not so good with these WRs.
Lincoln's assassination
Martin Luther King's assassination
I imagine there were lots of Americans that were very pleased with both of these events.
Don't think so weirdoIseeeverythingwithracismglassesbecauseofmyweirdoguilt guy.
Lincoln's assassination
Martin Luther King's assassination
You were painting with a much broader brush earlier Trey. That's okay, typical.
While I don't agree with much of what Trump says, it really has been a study in how closed minded most ProgLibs are . . . if you're not in lockstep with ProgLib ideals, they pretty much don't want to hear it. But hey, everybody else . . . keep an open mind.
Do you really believe that Trump actually believes that? LOL
I don't think outraged is the word I'd use Dax. Maybe, like, dumbfounded. And that goes for moderates as well.
Many are outraged and meltdown at everynon PCrough ridin' insane thing Trump says.
I was thinking maybe dislocated shoulder for Barnett.That's worst case scenario. I'm holding out hope that it was just a stinger.
@Jbanks_1: The plan is just to get better everyday.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re-upped. The website seems to be completely different now, and much much more limited, though maybe I'm doing it wrong. Used to be tons and tons of back content so I could go watch random games against like Kent State from 2011. Does anyone know if it's possible to access all that content from seasons past? The only game replays I can find are from last year but that's just not enough for this die-hard qat. Anyone have any insight on this?