Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - LickNeckey

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
76
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Golman Sachs (good read)
« on: May 16, 2011, 01:46:49 PM »
interesting read on the perjury of Goldman Sachs executives and their practices leading up to the mortgage crisis

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-people-vs-goldman-sachs-20110511?print=true

79
Kansas State Football / DITR
« on: January 28, 2011, 10:07:11 AM »
maybe Bill is on to something.  now all you haters say you're sorry

http://espn.go.com/blog/big12/post/_/id/24904/the-2010-all-big-12-team-as-recruits

80
Kansas State Football / Why OB can't recruit QB's (auburn related)
« on: November 18, 2010, 02:22:47 PM »
http://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/messagetopic.asp?p=22778676

fantastic read

(edit got scooped and can't delete thread  :bang:)

81
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Religous Right?
« on: October 15, 2010, 10:36:34 AM »
I understand that the republican right claims to be the true party of christianity and the moral compass of our nation.  However it seems to me that the right is also fundamentally opposed to most policies that Christ would seemingly support.  It seems to me that this Jesus fellow was all about helping the sick and the poor is soceity.  I think i read he railed against greed and even went as far as pomising the meek the earth.

So why is it that the heathen god hating lib's seemingly support the policies that reflect the teachings of christ and the party of religiosity does not?

thoughts?

82
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Obama Policies
« on: October 12, 2010, 12:03:15 PM »
When reading and discussing politics recently my conservative breatheren have consistantly voiced their displeasure and concern with his policies.  Most of this discussion seems to revolve around expansion of government and deficit spending and the impending catatstrophe each will generate.  However upon reflection and analysis is it possible that the policies of George W. actually did more to expand the physical size and scope of governmental control and intrusion in to private lives than Obama has.

Consider:

Big Government: It is said that Obama is in support of Big Government but have his actions really done anymore to alter the size or scope of government than those of W?  To me it would seem that the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and passing of No Child Left Behind and Patriot Act increased the size and scope of Government far more than any Obama policy has.  Obamacare that everyone is so afriad of has taken place yet so that expansion can not be counted, and even if it is does not require a creation of any new federal agency to oversee.  The plan simply states that americans must have insurance and companies larger than 50 people must provide insurance.  To me this would be a benefit to the insurance industry and lead to a need for more agents and competition within the insurance industry. 

Deficit Spending: George W inherited a budget surplus and in short order created a substantial deficit that was a hallmark of his presidency.   With a fair amount of money being spent to create agencies, support new legislation, and pursue 2 wars.  In contrast it would seem that much of Obama’s spending has not been on government programs/agencies but to fortify capitalism.  Government Buyouts and loans, a process and precedent started by the Bush presidency, went to corporations that were in dire need of assistance in order to stay afloat.  While much of the ARRA money was paid to civilian contractors to repair, replace, or improve infastructure across the nation.  Also a great deal of increase in spending is tied to increased spending within medicare and unemployment due to the economic recession a reality that Obama did not create.

83
http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2010/10/05/buffett-says-cut-taxes-for-the-poor/

Buffett says cut taxes for all but the rich
Posted by Colin Barr
October 5, 2010 11:02 am


Warren Buffett said it's time to raise taxes on the 'very rich' -- and perhaps cut them for the rest of the population.

Buffett, the billionaire investor who runs Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA), said Tuesday at Fortune's Most Powerful Women Summit in Washington that the nation's tax code "has gotten distorted to a huge extent," by levying higher taxes on secretaries and janitors than on CEOs and private equity whiners.


Tax rates: heading higher?
He called, as he has in the past, for policymakers to redress that iniquity by raising taxes on the rich. Buffett said taxes will have to rise in general in coming years if we want to dig our way out of a giant budget deficit.

"We are not taking in enough money at the federal government level," he said. He said tax collections (see chart, right) will have to rise back into the 18-20% range from below 15% lately.

But Buffett also added a new twist in an interview after his appearance with CNNMoney.com's Poppy Harlow: He said it's time to cut taxes on those outside the top tax brackets.

Buffett has been railing for years about the absurdity of the current tax structure – he remarked Tuesday with some disbelief that he pays the lowest rate in his Omaha office -- and has accordingly called for higher taxes on those earning large wages, including himself.

But he hasn't previously pushed for lower taxes on those making less. Asked why not, he said that no one ever asked.

A tax cut for low-income people could boost consumer spending at a time of high unemployment and fading government stimulus funds. But such a shift might not play well with the Tea Party types who have made an issue of the fact that 47% of U.S. households paid no federal income tax last year.

Regardless, Buffett says the tax numbers don't add up and will have to rise. So why not raise taxes on those who can afford to pay?

"We're going to need to get more money," said Buffett. "Why not get it from me instead of the guys who will serve us lunch?"

84
Kansas State Football / Should KSU seek the transfer of Tate Forcier
« on: September 05, 2010, 04:26:30 PM »
watchya think?

85
Kansas State Football / Tate Forcier Transferring
« on: September 05, 2010, 03:54:48 PM »
By transferring immediately would he be eligible to play next fall?

If so Ole Miss and Auburn fans should be pretty excited.

86
Kansas State Football / Lew Perkins
« on: June 14, 2010, 06:52:05 PM »
Now that i am back in reality the biggest winner in all of this is Sweet Lew.

Lew still could face disciplinary action due to the conflict of interests regarding fitness equipment.

Lew is the Athletic Director of a department that is currently in the midst of a federal investigation concerning millions of dollars of stolen revenue.

Lew was forced to miss one of the most important meetings of AD's in the history of the university because of grand jury testimony.

Lew is then protected and exhonerated by the u of k chancellor who aqccepts his resignation basically due to his overall shadyness, lack of integrity, and aptitude for backroom dealings.

After apparently doing nothing to resolve the conference realignment issue he is given a get out of jail free card and presented a golden watch in "retirement".


holy hullabaloo he is fracking Keyser Soze

87
thoughts?

in no particular order

Kevin O'Neill
Doc
McNeck (new address, same awesomeness)
Steve Alford
Oliver Purnell
Mike Brey
oscar Webber
Dana
Theus
Tubby


88
Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Reggie Miller
« on: April 19, 2010, 09:32:00 PM »
JFC is there a worse color guy in sports.

at times he sounds like the love child of bill cosby and roscoe p. coltrane. :facepalm:

90
Kansas State Football / QB Situation
« on: February 19, 2010, 07:22:43 PM »
Insidery Info:  fwiw friend says that lockers are oriented in position groups backs together, wr's together, etc.  He says that Billy Cosh, Carson Coffman, and Collin Kline have lockers next to each other, with one empty locker between them and RB's.

SLamur

Pages: 1 2 3 [4]