11201
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
11202
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Comey Comedy Show
« on: June 09, 2017, 09:52:59 AM »
Trump thinking it's meaningful for authorities to state that he is not PERSONALLY under investigation and going to a lot of trouble to try to get them to do so is such an oddball, self-serving Trump thing to do.
It's really weird, actually.
It's really weird, actually.
11203
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Comey Comedy Show
« on: June 09, 2017, 08:19:17 AM »
Comey obviously stuck his own neck out to totally and completely vindicate Trump.
11204
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: david frum thread
« on: June 08, 2017, 10:15:15 PM »Chum, serious question. How often do you look up the daily political news?
Some days zero. Some days five times. Usually two or three. Here's the thing. With Trump, there's just ALWAYS some sensational news (fake if you prefer) to post here. Every time I look, there's something to post.
11205
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: david frum thread
« on: June 08, 2017, 10:08:28 PM »Quote
Michael Isikioff of Yahoo News reported that four top D.C. lawyers had refused to handle Trump’s defense.
...
Isikoff’s reporting suggests that a lifelong habit of skipping out on bills has saddled Trump with an attorney ill-prepared for the task ahead.
He's such a goddamn dipshit.
11206
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 08, 2017, 07:46:49 PM »11207
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Comey Comedy Show
« on: June 08, 2017, 06:30:15 PM »
Most definitely, the 100% correct takaway here is that Trump's troubles are behind and everyone will be leaving him alone now.
11210
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump owns Russia
« on: June 07, 2017, 08:53:08 AM »There's nothing new under the sun.
We've seen the Flynn transcripts, he did nothing wrong.
11211
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump owns Russia
« on: June 06, 2017, 09:20:36 PM »Quote
The nation’s top intelligence official told associates in March that President Trump asked him if he could intervene with then-FBI Director James B. Comey to get the bureau to back off its focus on former national security adviser Michael Flynn in its Russia probe, according to officials.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/top-intelligence-official-told-associates-trump-asked-him-if-he-could-intervene-with-comey-to-get-fbi-to-back-off-flynn/2017/06/06/cc879f14-4ace-11e7-9669-250d0b15f83b_story.html
11212
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 06, 2017, 07:28:14 PM »11213
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 06, 2017, 07:26:57 PM »11214
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Official Better Call Saul thread
« on: June 05, 2017, 11:00:20 PM »
Nacho swapping Hector's pills. 
11215
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 05, 2017, 06:19:09 PM »11216
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Trump and Russia
« on: June 05, 2017, 04:04:57 PM »Man if only Trump would just pull an Obama and cite Executive Privilege.
Are you trying to argue that Trump is dumber than Obama?
11218
Other Sports (Tiger's Back) / Re: Official NBA Thread
« on: June 04, 2017, 09:12:55 PM »
When I see the people in courtside seats at these Golden State games, I always think of how absurdly wealthy they must be.
11219
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 04, 2017, 08:59:17 PM »11220
Kansas State Football / Re: Corey Sutton
« on: June 04, 2017, 02:31:58 PM »
crap! That was the only one I could think of.
11222
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Trump Presidency
« on: June 04, 2017, 08:29:57 AM »11223
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« on: June 03, 2017, 08:59:48 PM »Does anyone think that staying committed to the agreement was bad? Why? What's the rationale for leaving?
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
What's so special about today's climate? What if tomorrow's is better?
So, we should reverse course on previous decisions on the basis that we might like the alternative better? Wouldn't it follow that we should continually be reversing ourselves? Because there are continually alternatives we might like better? I don't think this is a very practical suggestion.
Or..... we could stop pretending we can really control the thermostat if only we spend enough money and raise the price of energy enough. I know this is difficult to grasp - but one alternative is to just live our lives.
So, it makes you feel good not to pursue what you believe to be a fruitless endeavor. It makes other people feel good to pursue what they believe is not a fruitless endeavor. What is the reason to exit the agreement?
So now we're down to acknowledging this is nothing more than liberal butthurt feelings. Progress!!!
I'd put it this way. You say that all there is on the other side is liberal butthurt. Show me that you've got more than conservative butthurt on your side.
11224
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« on: June 03, 2017, 08:37:35 PM »Does anyone think that staying committed to the agreement was bad? Why? What's the rationale for leaving?
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
What's so special about today's climate? What if tomorrow's is better?
So, we should reverse course on previous decisions on the basis that we might like the alternative better? Wouldn't it follow that we should continually be reversing ourselves? Because there are continually alternatives we might like better? I don't think this is a very practical suggestion.
Or..... we could stop pretending we can really control the thermostat if only we spend enough money and raise the price of energy enough. I know this is difficult to grasp - but one alternative is to just live our lives.
So, it makes you feel good not to pursue what you believe to be a fruitless endeavor. It makes other people feel good to pursue what they believe is not a fruitless endeavor. What is the reason to exit the agreement?
The juice isn't worth the squeeze.
You think staying in vs. exiting can be quantified? I don't.
Then how can we make any judgements for or against?
Is there value in being a part of the team rather than pissing off everyone else on the team? What sorts of values are there in exiting the agreement?
11225
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« on: June 03, 2017, 07:19:51 PM »Does anyone think that staying committed to the agreement was bad? Why? What's the rationale for leaving?
If people want to buy certain kinds of products over others, for whatever reason, why should amyone care? That's their business.
What's so special about today's climate? What if tomorrow's is better?
So, we should reverse course on previous decisions on the basis that we might like the alternative better? Wouldn't it follow that we should continually be reversing ourselves? Because there are continually alternatives we might like better? I don't think this is a very practical suggestion.
Or..... we could stop pretending we can really control the thermostat if only we spend enough money and raise the price of energy enough. I know this is difficult to grasp - but one alternative is to just live our lives.
So, it makes you feel good not to pursue what you believe to be a fruitless endeavor. It makes other people feel good to pursue what they believe is not a fruitless endeavor. What is the reason to exit the agreement?
The juice isn't worth the squeeze.
You think staying in vs. exiting can be quantified? I don't.