1901
Wacky's World / Re: BONER ALERT! All time greatest crushes!
« on: February 12, 2023, 11:46:36 AM »Natasha Lyonne in Poker Face is doing it for me.
What did you think of Charlize Theron in Monster?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
What did you think of Charlize Theron in Monster?
1902
Wacky's World / Re: Wacky Ban
« on: February 12, 2023, 11:43:38 AM »
Not to be all #marinategate but can I get a definitive ruling on whether it was steak or chicken? Fwiw if it was chicken I take back what I said about the marinade
1903
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: politics of crypto (ban that crap)
« on: February 12, 2023, 09:51:08 AM »
I think he’s trying to give himself permission
1904
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: MEGA MAGA
« on: February 12, 2023, 09:21:07 AM »amaze
https://twitter.com/sueonthetown/status/1624154363613569027?s=46&t=WlmKyId1rz9wEBb68qvXXw
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd get all in her guts and pound the antisemitism right out of her, gladly take the assignment.
I’d find out what that mouth do, (even though it is a kinda weird looking mouth)
1905
Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: TT 2
« on: February 12, 2023, 09:01:03 AM »
The reactions by KSU fans to last nights game has been, honestly, troubling. To those who have flocked to a ksu sports message board and expressed frustration…stop being so incredibly weird. Do the normal thing and infiltrate the athletic staff so that you can either run practice yourself or get the coaches responsible fired. Ideally, just take over the role of AD so you can clean house wherever necessary.
But this whole flocking to a message board and expressing frustration instead of immediately getting over it and moving on…it had to stop.
But this whole flocking to a message board and expressing frustration instead of immediately getting over it and moving on…it had to stop.
1907
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Say something controversial
« on: February 11, 2023, 10:56:40 PM »I often wonder what nirvana would have become in the 2000's.
Probably still better than anything from stp
Listened to some podcast the other day (can’t remember title, might look it up) and it was this guy who wrote a book about the 90s but tried to look at it from the viewpoint at the time instead of with hindsight and he was like “the thing about the 90s is there was this huge import on being true to their art and “selling out” was like the worst thing you could do and nirvana was really struggling to reconcile that fact bc they were getting so popular “
And I’m not sure what I can extrapolate from that but I would tend to agree in the 90s selling out definitely seemed to be frowned upon
1908
Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: TT 2
« on: February 11, 2023, 09:29:23 PM »Didn't deserve to win, probably would have been bad for the team had they pulled it out. Until this team starts valuing the ball, it is a bad team that likely will finish sixth or seventh in the conference. Nowell has become a liability on half our offense possessions.Lol relax
It’s fine to be upset. We just lost to the worst team in the conference, and looked like white hot dogshit in the process. And on top of that we really haven’t been playing so great the last couple weeks. If this isn’ta completely reasonable time to be frustrated then I don’t know what is
1909
Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: TT 2
« on: February 11, 2023, 08:19:14 PM »
Tang can’t tell me (a fan) to expect to win from now on if they lose to the worst team in the conference
1910
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: TRUMP v. DESANTIS! LAST MAGA STANDING 2024 BLOODBATH SHOWDOWN!
« on: February 11, 2023, 10:52:44 AM »
You know Ted Cruz would be pulling that mullet back into a ponytail if he thought it would get him the VP nod (he would actually do it anyway even without any favors promised in return)
1911
Wacky's World / Re: Wacky Ban
« on: February 11, 2023, 10:44:21 AM »
Ok but fr who marinades steaks? Like bruh you're making doctor recruiter money... Just buy a decent cut of meat
1912
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: TexAgs politics board gems thread
« on: February 10, 2023, 06:32:05 PM »I actually just assumed he rented out his house on Air BnB.
Well, it's not his, but he is really good friends with the guy who owns it. Practically family.
1913
Kansas State Football / Re: Smoke your cigars and enjoy the band while you can....
« on: February 10, 2023, 02:00:12 PM »No is reading all that fam.
fine. is it reasonable to think that CFB is changing so much that pretty soon lots of the fans aren't going to like what it has become? and all this conference realignment will have been for nothing b/c the networks guessed wrong that viewship would remain high?
I think more fan bases will be engaged now that 12 teams make the playoff. All four major conferences will send a rep every year. TCU getting to the natty means basically anyone can make it.
Even if 8-10 of those teams are from either the SEC or big 10?
1914
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Signs of getting old
« on: February 10, 2023, 01:54:02 PM »
Guys I just grifted some Boomer on FB marketplace for $200. Sold him the "AntiMicrowave" the appliance that gets your food "as cold as if you put it in the fridge overnight" in less than 3 minutes! It was literally just my old busted microwave and I just threw some old batteries inside lmfao 
1915
Kansas State Football / Re: Smoke your cigars and enjoy the band while you can....
« on: February 10, 2023, 11:52:28 AM »No is reading all that fam.
fine. is it reasonable to think that CFB is changing so much that pretty soon lots of the fans aren't going to like what it has become? and all this conference realignment will have been for nothing b/c the networks guessed wrong that viewship would remain high?
1916
Kansas State Football / Re: Next OC?
« on: February 10, 2023, 11:00:01 AM »Gave myself bloody elbows this morning to celebrate the excellent news
may your lacerations get re-opened every saturday in perpetuity. (complimentary)
1917
Kansas State Football / Re: Smoke your cigars and enjoy the band while you can....
« on: February 10, 2023, 10:57:47 AM »
Okay, someone explain this to me like i'm five if i'm not understanding this correctly.
So, the thing driving conference re-alignment is...network deals. The networks think "the television audiences are going to want to see this, so we are going to pay conferences big $$"
so, naturally, schools are going to want to be in the conferences that are going to lead to them getting the most $$
Okay, that makes sense and is all well and good...but is it possible that the networks have made their calculations based on a faulty premise? Right now, people love college football for XYZ reasons. But all this conference realignment is enevitably bastardizing at least a few, if not most of those reasons.
Is it inaccurate to think that eventually, the viewers at home - which is ultimately the source of the money the networks are paying to fuel the conference realignment - might just be like "okay whatever this is...is not the thing i loved so much and i've lost interest and won't prioritize watching this anymore"?
I mean i get that the SEC and BIG have set themselves up to where their schools are going to have the most incentive to care, b/c those are the conferences that are going to be getting the most teams into the playoff and thus have the best chance at winning nattys.
But like, even with the BIG for example...if michigan and ohio state don't play each other every year...then what's the point? but with all those schools they are going to have to give that up or essentially tailor the rules around michigan and ohio state...so to accomodate them that means other schools are probably going to get a fairly undesireable schedule as a result.
Maybe i'm wrong...maybe if you ask Penn St or Michigan St or Iowa fans what's important to them...maybe they all unanimously agree that what matters most is that michigan and ohio state play every year and they will take whatever goofy schedule has to happen as long as that remains true. But I dunno man...i guess i could see just equally as likely that the wisconsin and illinois fans are like huh okay...so, this season we are playing 75% of our games against teams with which we have no historical affiliaton or rivalry, on the other side of the country, that we don't really know or care about...and uh...yeah i guess i just don't really care all that much because why would i?
i dunno. maybe i'm underestimating the average football fan. maybe the average football fan will gladly accept whatever watered down bastardization of the game they used to know and they will do so with enthusiasm. But like, just look at facebook as a cautionary tale. My point is that even something so universally "beloved" or at least utilized can very quickly lose a whole crapton of its users when you let the focus become exclusively about monetization instead of the product, and people will move on to something else.
^if i'm just completely wrong about any of that please someone explain to me. like i'm 5.
So, the thing driving conference re-alignment is...network deals. The networks think "the television audiences are going to want to see this, so we are going to pay conferences big $$"
so, naturally, schools are going to want to be in the conferences that are going to lead to them getting the most $$
Okay, that makes sense and is all well and good...but is it possible that the networks have made their calculations based on a faulty premise? Right now, people love college football for XYZ reasons. But all this conference realignment is enevitably bastardizing at least a few, if not most of those reasons.
Is it inaccurate to think that eventually, the viewers at home - which is ultimately the source of the money the networks are paying to fuel the conference realignment - might just be like "okay whatever this is...is not the thing i loved so much and i've lost interest and won't prioritize watching this anymore"?
I mean i get that the SEC and BIG have set themselves up to where their schools are going to have the most incentive to care, b/c those are the conferences that are going to be getting the most teams into the playoff and thus have the best chance at winning nattys.
But like, even with the BIG for example...if michigan and ohio state don't play each other every year...then what's the point? but with all those schools they are going to have to give that up or essentially tailor the rules around michigan and ohio state...so to accomodate them that means other schools are probably going to get a fairly undesireable schedule as a result.
Maybe i'm wrong...maybe if you ask Penn St or Michigan St or Iowa fans what's important to them...maybe they all unanimously agree that what matters most is that michigan and ohio state play every year and they will take whatever goofy schedule has to happen as long as that remains true. But I dunno man...i guess i could see just equally as likely that the wisconsin and illinois fans are like huh okay...so, this season we are playing 75% of our games against teams with which we have no historical affiliaton or rivalry, on the other side of the country, that we don't really know or care about...and uh...yeah i guess i just don't really care all that much because why would i?
i dunno. maybe i'm underestimating the average football fan. maybe the average football fan will gladly accept whatever watered down bastardization of the game they used to know and they will do so with enthusiasm. But like, just look at facebook as a cautionary tale. My point is that even something so universally "beloved" or at least utilized can very quickly lose a whole crapton of its users when you let the focus become exclusively about monetization instead of the product, and people will move on to something else.
^if i'm just completely wrong about any of that please someone explain to me. like i'm 5.
1918
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Master Political Social Media Thread
« on: February 10, 2023, 10:14:08 AM »
Dax and I have a 1A right to see some Hunter pole and hole, and DAX AND I BOTH DEMAND TO EXERCISE THAT RIGHT
1919
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Political Facebook Posts/Tweets From People
« on: February 10, 2023, 09:32:54 AM »
i'm just pappin' your kat, my dude!
1920
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: TexAgs politics board gems thread
« on: February 10, 2023, 09:31:31 AM »They sure love making up stories.
there's probably at least a nugget of truth there. i think the reality of this situation is that this guy is like, the assistant manager at a gift shop at a resort in colorado. Good chance that one of his co-workers (that he does not have the authority to fire) made a comment about pronouns on business cards. He had no ability to allow or deny any such request (that likely wasn't even made) and when he got home he cranked one out in the shower imagining the scenario he described play out.
1921
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Master Political Social Media Thread
« on: February 10, 2023, 09:21:31 AM »imagine sorrow screaming about "those are just mean tweets, sorry about hurting your feelings someone who makes me uncomfortable" and then in reality you had the softest feelings and cried to twitter to censor Chrissy Teigen.
If that were me I would accuse people of deflecting and some other weak-dick stuff. It has be debilitating to your psyche to see trump doing that
look slowdug, i don't know why you cant wrap your slow brain around any of this. its a matter of censorship. As a proud MAGA, a MAGA who doesn't want the government to have such far reaching powers, all I want - nay - DEMAND - is that a private company take down a mean tweet written by a private citizen about donald trump. Also, I DEMAND you let me see pics of Hunter's dong and sack and maybe hole (even if he didn't give permission for me to see photos of his dong and sack and maybe hole). Figure it out, derp
1922
Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball / Re: Race for the 2022-23 Reg Season Phillips 66 Crown Thread
« on: February 09, 2023, 03:52:40 PM »
Eers and pokes are kinda peaking and that could be a buzzsaw. Tech we could crap our pants if we aren't careful but otherwise a game we should win if we stay focused
1923
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: Signs of getting old
« on: February 09, 2023, 01:42:24 PM »Maybe you're the maniac.i don't feel safe rn
you're sleeping with one so better keep one eye open
my worldview was a lot cozier when i thought she was the only one...now that i'm understanding that like seriously half of this board is the same way i just don't even
Yes it seems like the call is coming from inside the house
1925
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Political Facebook Posts/Tweets From People
« on: February 09, 2023, 01:33:14 PM »
Katpappy doesn't see continental ancestry