201
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: POST YOUR #1 FAVORITE CLASSIC GIF OAT ITT
« on: November 01, 2013, 04:44:59 PM »
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
202
Kansas State Football / Re: EMAW hero walks onto field during game; parties all second half
« on: October 28, 2013, 10:46:51 PM »I know of a story* of a game where we were blowing out some directional school in like 99 or 2000 and a guy who was the John of that era walked all the way onto the sideline, to the KSU bench, and up to Snyder during the 4th quarter and said "put me in coach!".
Pretty sure security then got involved.
*possible urban legend
True story, was a member of the POWL
203
Kansas State Football / Re: eff this team and coaching staff
« on: September 21, 2013, 10:25:50 PM »Could Morgan Burns, Will Davis, and Mike Moore be any worse than the guys starting over them?
Add Jordan Willis to this list.
204
Kansas State Football / Re: K-S-U....0-2
« on: August 29, 2013, 09:46:43 PM »yous are an adidas school, too.
no u r
yous are an adidas school, it just never happens.
205
Kansas State Football / Re: Post NDSU Fan Interactions Here
« on: August 29, 2013, 09:35:00 PM »This would never happen in Fargo
There are literally dozens of you... DOZENS!
206
Kansas State Football / Re: Other neat games this year, aside from Kansas State
« on: August 29, 2013, 06:29:36 PM »Anyone watching the game hear when they were talking about Clowney's ventilated equipment or something? I missed it. They talked a little about it then zoomed in on him and talked about how he is already exhausted and not in shape.
After talking nonstop in the pregame show about how he is in the best shape of his life.
207
Kansas State Football / Re: goEMAW Fantasy Football League
« on: August 28, 2013, 10:02:14 AM »
What are the scoring rules?
208
Kansas State Football / Re: Little clip on what to expect from the Bison
« on: August 23, 2013, 08:02:02 PM »
We are a rowdy bunch and the players feed off us fans. We will not be intimidated as you can see by billy stadium
I'd say we got you beat:
Arguably better vid.
209
Kansas State Football / Re: Gameday attire
« on: August 22, 2013, 09:54:39 PM »http://www.petermillar.com/collegiate/kansas-state-university/kansas-state-university-nano-luxe-tattersall-classic-button-down-shirt-in-lilac.html
Ordered.
This will be spectacular with my light grey trousers, official KState blazer from Borck Brothers and these custom suede Nike Cortez sneaks:
Those are sweet....
These just came in the other day: http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/product/shox-turbo-6-id-running-shoes/#?mid=589970726&cp=usns_em_auto_idorderfinish
210
Kansas State Football / Re: If we pull off the upset next Friday night...
« on: August 22, 2013, 07:38:04 PM »
211
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Political Facebook Posts/Tweets From People
« on: August 10, 2013, 01:04:39 PM »Quote
212
Kansas State Football / Re: 2013-2014 K-State budget
« on: August 05, 2013, 07:49:50 PM »On the expenses side, I see that debt service is projected to be $5.48 million. How much debt do we actually have on our books to make our annual payments be this high? It has to be near $80 million, doesn't it?
We have 81.3M in long term debt, 53.6M of which was issued in 2012 for the WSC and BB training facility. We received record amounts of contributions but it still wasn't even close to the full cost of the new facilities. They weren't given all up front either.
you seem 2 kno wtf you're talking about here so i'm gonna lay it on the line w/ you. do you think $81.3m is a lot of long term debt? seems pretty pud. my move would be to borrow more, while the borrowing is cheap. a lot more, not just a little. fort knox type crap, and i kno you kno wtf i'm talking about. can i get some input from you on my data?
We probably could have issued more since we are currently sitting on a giant pile of cash (49M
, up 19M from last year), but I can see why they didn't since interest rates are rising again. We are already going to be paying around 3M in interest next year and 48.8M over the life of the bonds we issued.
213
Kansas State Football / Re: By how much are you overlooking North Dakota State?
« on: August 05, 2013, 07:31:50 PM »I dare Ksu to overlook NDSU !!
Double dog dare?
214
Kansas State Football / Re: 2013-2014 K-State budget
« on: August 05, 2013, 07:29:20 PM »On the expenses side, I see that debt service is projected to be $5.48 million. How much debt do we actually have on our books to make our annual payments be this high? It has to be near $80 million, doesn't it?
We have 81.3M in long term debt, 53.6M of which was issued in 2012 for the WSC and BB training facility. We received record amounts of contributions but it still wasn't even close to the full cost of the new facilities. They weren't given all up front either.
215
The New Joe Montgomery Birther Pit / Re: Political Facebook Posts/Tweets From People
« on: August 04, 2013, 06:30:19 PM »
216
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: My new Health Insurance sucks you guys...
« on: July 30, 2013, 01:44:54 PM »
Sounds like you have a high deductible plan if it doesn't cover prescriptions. Odds are you are saving money in premiums over a plan that has a prescription co-pay if you only see the doctor once a year.
217
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: The goEMAW.com map project
« on: July 29, 2013, 06:53:29 PM »
1. What county and state do you consider yourself originally from? (If you're like me and you moved around a lot as a kid and have no ties to your birthplace, put the place you identify most with) Butler, KS
2. What county and state do you currently live in? Sedgwick, KS
3. Did you attend EMAW? Yes
4. If the answer to #3 is yes, did you get a degree from EMAW? Yes
5. If the answer to #3 is no, did you attend another school? If so, where?
6. Did you get a second (or third) degree? If so, where? No
218
Essentially Flyertalk / Re: GPC Wabash Station Thread Title Of The Day
« on: June 30, 2013, 08:13:19 AM »Here's a good OP from kansasstate.scout.fartQuotehttp://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=173&f=4287&t=11669149
219
Kansas State Football / Re: USA Today Athletic Department Finances
« on: May 08, 2013, 07:03:03 PM »
ladies and gentlemen, i present to you, KIM CHARLAND!!!
220
Kansas State Football / Re: USA Today Athletic Department Finances
« on: May 08, 2013, 06:48:30 PM »We spend $278,500 on parking?
Am I reading this right?
Could be that Kansas State University or another K-State entity owns the parking lot and K-State Athletics, Inc. (the AD) just leases it from that entity.
221
Kansas State Football / Re: USA Today Athletic Department Finances
« on: May 08, 2013, 06:41:37 PM »What we don't know: How we account for "profit" or how we alocate "profit" $$$.As has been discussed on here, K-State counts all donations made during the year even if some of the money is pledged and won't be received until some future year. For example, for WSC assume donors in the luxury boxes had to make a 5 year commitment... they've given cash to K-State for year 1, but won't give K-State the money for years 2 through 5 until the future. However, K-State is counting all of that cash in the current year.
We are just accruing the contributions revenue and we leave the rest as a receivable. We still have a profit (just not from a cash flow perspective). It's a perfectly acceptable accounting treatment.
I'm not familiar with athletic departments, but the vast majority of companies use the accrual method instead of the cash method.
222
Kansas State Football / Re: USA Today Athletic Department Finances
« on: May 08, 2013, 11:11:05 AM »
Contributions decreasing nearly $12m from '11 to '12. I'm guessing this has a lot to do with donations towards the westside expansion in '11, but it's still a little strange.
I believe USA Today has this incorrect on their summary. For 2011 they are using the contributions line item from the financials plus the two separately stated contributions line items further down for the WSC and BBTF. For 2012 they are only using the contributions line item and they have apparently included the separately stated contributions somewhere else. I think this is why total revenue has not changed much while contributions have.
I could be wrong though.